SpaceX and other space news updates

1,484,075 Views | 16342 Replies | Last: 44 min ago by txags92
rednecked
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Faustus • 3:08p, 10/14/24
AG
Access to space is the sine qua non of a credible space program.

ya think?!


Reply Quote
4
aTmAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Faustus • 3:10p, 10/14/24
AG
Nearly the same could be said about NASA. Imagine if there was no SpaceX. Where would NASA be right now?
Reply Quote
14
Kenneth_2003
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OnlyForNow • 3:18p, 10/14/24
AG
OnlyForNow said:
It looked like there was a planned RUD of starship right as it touched down in the water (based on the bouy cam)
That was my take as well. Confirm a soft water landing then activate the FTS. Activating the FTS also ensures that you aren't leaving live explosives to potentially be floating around the ocean or washing up onshore somewhere since this ship soft landed in one piece.

The traditionally non-recovered first stages that slam into the ocean do so supersonically. We all watched the SH Booster needling back to the launch tower. Now think about that as every first stage booster in the history of spaceflight. It's just that no one has ever been there to see them. The Saturn S1C's that have been found are smashed.
Reply Quote
Kceovaisnt-
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:37p, 10/14/24
AG
Elon would be very pleased to hear that this thread is now on page 420.
Reply Quote
24
Decay
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:39p, 10/14/24
AG
I can't wait for something ridiculous like his 420th starship launch finds alien life
Reply Quote
10
The Kraken
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OnlyForNow • 4:06p, 10/14/24
AG
OnlyForNow said:
We should all go back and watch and study...


I fully agree that hot metal doesn't react too well when hitting water - BUT - the return capsules have never exploded when landing in the ocean.

I think it's either 100% planned, or a by product of the ship tipping over and then boom - which would undoubtably be a known thing, since it flips from bellyflop anyways.

Capsules spending several minutes in -40 degree air then several more minutes slowed by parachutes have time to cool down...plus I believe most of the heat energy is shed away with the ablation of the heat shield.
Reply Quote
1
V8Aggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:16p, 10/14/24
AG
I can't wait for him to send the Tesla bots to mars with them driving a Tesla for ****s and giggles.
Reply Quote
6
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:25p, 10/14/24
AG
New view of The Catch posted by SpaceX

Reply Quote
11
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:26p, 10/14/24
AG
Here's the full SpaceX feed from Sunday's launch/landing.

Reply Quote
5
fullback44
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:26p, 10/14/24
AG
The EU space program is a giant money grab from its citizens and seems all hubris and wasted taxpayers money. Elon is showing up all these space agencies. They are all huge giant money pits that dont produce for their countries. Crazy how one guy can show all these countries how space flight should work and at a fraction of the cost. The EU has tons of stupid and wasteful regulations, not just their space agency.
Reply Quote
6
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OnlyForNow • 4:33p, 10/14/24
AG
OnlyForNow said:
We should all go back and watch and study...


I fully agree that hot metal doesn't react too well when hitting water - BUT - the return capsules have never exploded when landing in the ocean.

I think it's either 100% planned, or a by product of the ship tipping over and then boom - which would undoubtably be a known thing, since it flips from bellyflop anyways.

Do the return capsules still have propellant in them from the landing burn? Release of that residual propellant from cracked hot metal feed lines due to water immersion would be a great way to cause it to blow up.
Reply Quote
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The Kraken • 4:36p, 10/14/24
AG
The Kraken said:
OnlyForNow said:
We should all go back and watch and study...


I fully agree that hot metal doesn't react too well when hitting water - BUT - the return capsules have never exploded when landing in the ocean.

I think it's either 100% planned, or a by product of the ship tipping over and then boom - which would undoubtably be a known thing, since it flips from bellyflop anyways.

Capsules spending several minutes in -40 degree air then several more minutes slowed by parachutes have time to cool down...plus I believe most of the heat energy is shed away with the ablation of the heat shield.
Capsules also don't do a landing burn to heat up the area of the rocket about to be first into the water.
Reply Quote
4
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aTmAg • 6:09p, 10/14/24
AG
aTmAg said:
Nearly the same could be said about NASA. Imagine if there was no SpaceX. Where would NASA be right now?
Yes, absent SpaceX, let's face it, RFA's statement would be equally true here.

Quote:
Europe has ambitious private space players. With innovative ideas, courage and a vision. Unfortunately, they are being held by the long arm and are in danger of withering away while old structures, processes and mindsets are maintained.

What we need immediately and systematically are state anchor customers, substantial investment, and a framework that allows and promotes unbureaucratic, fast and risk-taking development.

Otherwise, Europe will quickly sink into insignificance when it comes to the exploration of space, its resources and its potential. And we leave it to the rest of the world to make history. Just like #SpaceX did yesterday.

It is up to Europe, up to us.
In fact, there are elements in the US trying to do the same to our own private players. But I don't think those elements will succeed, here. A real rivalry or competitors from Europe would be very healthy, and personally I think it's just sad that they are not facilitating that (and likewise, frankly, the Russians who have squandered their legacy of innovation and engineering capacity in this area).
Reply Quote
1
Mr President Elect
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:59p, 10/14/24
AG
New video just dropped:
Reply Quote
17
flintdragon
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mr President Elect • 7:02p, 10/14/24
AG
Mr President Elect said:
New video just dropped:
can't get enough of these videos...
Reply Quote
12
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:11p, 10/14/24
New longer tower video! Probably the best one yet!

Reply Quote
8
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mr President Elect • 7:23p, 10/14/24
AG
Mr President Elect said:
New video just dropped:
It's hard to overstate how incredible this is.

A 20 story, well over a thousand ton tube of steel and fuel falling out of the sky at 4500 kph glides smoothly for a soft landing into the arms of a mechanical tower. I still can't believe it worked perfectly the first time.
Reply Quote
18
JobSecurity
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mr President Elect • 7:35p, 10/14/24
AG
Mr President Elect said:
New video just dropped:
This is nucking futs

I had no idea how small the catch pins were. They're shooting a skyscraper into space and landing with a two liter soda bottle onto a balance beam
Reply Quote
9
bthotugigem05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:38p, 10/14/24
AG
Those catch pins are likely much bigger than they appear. The grid fins are the size of a car, for comparison.

The shimmy back and forth as the arms hugged it was really interesting to me.
Reply Quote
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to JobSecurity • 7:39p, 10/14/24
AG
JobSecurity said:
Mr President Elect said:
New video just dropped:
This is nucking futs

I had no idea how small the catch pins were. They're shooting a skyscraper into space and landing with a two liter soda bottle onto a balance beam
Small is relative. Would love a picture to show the scale but those things are I think like the size of a Cat D10
Reply Quote
1
Sea Speed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:48p, 10/14/24
AG
They are about the size of a person. I saw an image on a Twitter thread but cnt find it now.
Reply Quote
tk for tu juan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:48p, 10/14/24
12:38 for human scale of gridfins and pin

Reply Quote
3
ABATTBQ11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RED AG 98 • 7:52p, 10/14/24
AG
The grid fins are. The catch pins are impressively small.
Reply Quote
4
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ABATTBQ11 • 8:00p, 10/14/24
AG
Ah that's right. I have 3M x 7M in my head but yeah that's the grid fin.
Reply Quote
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:12p, 10/14/24
AG
I want to say I read somewhere the landing pads/pegs are only 8-10" in diameter. Amazing that only two of them can support all that wieght.
Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:42p, 10/14/24
Reply Quote
7
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:00p, 10/14/24
Reply Quote
9
fullback44
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:09p, 10/14/24
AG
will25u said:
The man is a genius… and to thank there are idiots on this site that think they guy isn't very smart … we have a few low IQ dummies on our site !
Reply Quote
9
fullback44
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to tk for tu juan • 9:25p, 10/14/24
AG
tk for tu juan said:
12:38 for human scale of gridfins and pin

Very cool video
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:01p, 10/14/24
Reply Quote
7
lb3
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 10:12p, 10/14/24
AG
txags92 said:
OnlyForNow said:
We should all go back and watch and study...


I fully agree that hot metal doesn't react too well when hitting water - BUT - the return capsules have never exploded when landing in the ocean.

I think it's either 100% planned, or a by product of the ship tipping over and then boom - which would undoubtably be a known thing, since it flips from bellyflop anyways.

Do the return capsules still have propellant in them from the landing burn? Release of that residual propellant from cracked hot metal feed lines due to water immersion would be a great way to cause it to blow up.
Simply hovering until the tanks are empty would be catastrophic.
Reply Quote
1
hph6203
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:21p, 10/14/24
AG
"The raptor engine will never work."
"Ok, it worked but barely and they'll never get 33 of them to light simultaneously."
"Ok, it worked, but the belly flop will never work."
"Ok, it worked, but the stainless steel ship will never survive re-entry."
"Ok, it worked, but the flap melted and there's absolutely no way they'll catch a booster."
"Ok, it worked but they'll never make it to orbit."

And then payload.
And then refueling.
And then landing on the moon.
And then landing on Mars.
And then sending enough material on mars for humans to make it there and back.
And then send enough material to colonize Mars.
And then some as of yet undetermined celestial body.
Reply Quote
12
tk for tu juan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:54a, 10/15/24
Pretty good hand tracking of booster return

Reply Quote
3
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 3:52a, 10/15/24
AG
Nice. Text for the non-twitterers;

Quote:
Since your handle is "Whole Mars", perhaps this lengthy reply is apropos:

Getting the cost per ton to the surface of Mars low enough that humanity has the resources to make life multiplanetary requires a roughly 1000X improvement in rocket & spacecraft technology.

Recent US Mars missions have had a cost per ton of useful load to the surface of Mars of about $1B. Moreover, it has become more, not less, expensive over time!

To build a city on Mars that can grow by itself likely requires at least a million tons of equipment, which would therefore require >$1000 trillion, an obviously impossible number, given that US GDP is only $29T.

However, if rocket technology can be improved by 1000X, then the cost of becoming sustainably multiplanetary would drop to ~$1T, which could be spread out over 40 or more years, so <$25B/year.

At that cost, it becomes possible to make life multiplanetary, ensuring the long-term survival of life as we know it, without materially affecting people's standard of living on Earth.

Starship is designed to achieve a >1000X improvement over existing systems and, especially after yesterday's booster catch and precise ocean landing of the ship, I am now convinced that it can work.
Will see how long they decide to wait for the next one, my swag would be around 30-45 days for tower checks etc:
Reply Quote
4
Nanomachines son
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hph6203 • 7:46a, 10/15/24
hph6203 said:
"The raptor engine will never work."
"Ok, it worked but barely and they'll never get 33 of them to light simultaneously."
"Ok, it worked, but the belly flop will never work."
"Ok, it worked, but the stainless steel ship will never survive re-entry."
"Ok, it worked, but the flap melted and there's absolutely no way they'll catch a booster."
"Ok, it worked but they'll never make it to orbit."

And then payload.
And then refueling.
And then landing on the moon.
And then landing on Mars.
And then sending enough material on mars for humans to make it there and back.
And then send enough material to colonize Mars.
And then some as of yet undetermined celestial body.




SpaceX, an American company, is poised to lead the Space Age into the next arena.

I guarantee that Musk is has a number of secret projects related to exotic propulsion systems, there is no way a man like this is going to be satisfied with rocket propulsion despite changing the entire game around them.

They effectively already own space. The future is very bright.
Reply Quote
15
First Page Last Page
Page 420 of 467 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.