***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

288,896 Views | 2899 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by will25u
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CatD11Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have zero confidence in Roberts and ACB.
Agree with Aggie Jurist - states like NY, CA and IL will ignore / legislate / proceed, regardless of national law.
There is no level of corruption these states will not stoop for dem-cult to retain power.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Should result in rule 11 sanctions - but alas it won't.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does 12 pages qualify as TDS?



I'm Gipper
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Does 12 pages qualify as TDS?





The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Judge William Young of Massachusetts, whose anti-Trump rulings have already been overruled twice by the Supreme Court and accused by Justice Gorsuch of defying the Court, just ruled that non-citizen guests here on visas have an unlimited right to free speech without ever being deported.

Hmm. Kind of torn on that one. "Unlimited"? No. American citizens don't even have unlimited rights to free speech.

OTOH, absent immigration fraud or incitement, applying equal protection to visitors is valuable, too. I am saying that in comparison to the lack of free speech rights in nearly every other nation on earth.
Dallas82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The ruling specifically does not say unlimited speech.
"'No law' means 'no law'," Young continued a reference to the first amendment's stipulation that Congress "shall make no law" abridging the freedom of speech. "No one's freedom of speech is unlimited, of course, but these limits are the same for both citizens and non-citizens alike."
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can say what you want. Doesn't mean we have to keep you here on conditional immigration status. This judge is a ****tard.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

You can say what you want. Doesn't mean we have to keep you here on conditional immigration status. This judge is a ****tard.

Absent diplomats and their immediate families while posted here with diplomatic immunity, foreigner on a visa who commits a crime, still receives American due process.

And that is a distinction with a difference. Deportation is a civil matter, not criminal. The only "process" to which they are entitled is much different and much, much lower.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wouldn't that mean that once here, an illegal could say death to America and other things that show they aren't here in good faith and the government could then not deport them because of that because their speech is protected?

Don't know that I agree with this if what I just laid out is correct.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty much. And that's what libs want. They want third world trash here that normal Americans can't get rid of. They want Americans living in fear.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Wouldn't that mean that once here, an illegal could say death to America and other things that show they aren't here in good faith and the government could then not report them because of that because their speech is protected?

Don't know that I agree with this if what I just laid out is correct.

It is confusing when a judge conflates our American legal concepts in application. Missing the legal nuance entirely in that rationale.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



85-year-old Judge William Young ...

Enough said.
Dallas82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

will25u said:



85-year-old Judge William Young ...

Enough said.


So he is what, six years older than Trump?
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dallas82 said:

Ag87H2O said:

will25u said:



85-year-old Judge William Young ...

Enough said.


So he is what, six years older than Trump?

Not to derail the thread, but I wouldn't want Trump running for another term either. My dad is 85 years old and is still pretty sharp and physically active for his age, but he's not what he was even ten years ago, especially for a demanding job like a judge. There needs to be an upper limit to when these guys are forced to retire. Not sure what it is, but if they don't have sense enough to step out themselves then there needs to be an age limit - I don't care if they are conservative or liberal.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And?
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are things as a lawyer that feel good to write. But you don't file them in court. You write them, feel good about it, sleep on it, and then re-do it in a professional manner.

A 161 page screed littered with handwritten notes and random quotes is certainly something a professional advocate would never do. And it is exactly how an article III judge shreds whatever credibility he may have had.

I read that drivel and just laughed. If a first year associate turned something like that in to me, they'd be fired on the spot.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Now do silencers. They remain on the NFA despite the elimination of the registration tax.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status for up to 600,000 Venezuelan immigrants, meaning some could ultimately be deported.
The court granted an emergency request filed by the Trump administration seeking to block a judge's ruling that said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem failed to follow the correct process in revoking Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans.

Quote:

The court's three liberal justices dissented.
One of them, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote a dissenting opinion criticizing the court for once again granting an emergency request filed by the Trump administration, as it has done in 20 other cases.
"I cannot abide our repeated, gratuitous, and harmful interference with cases pending in the lower courts while lives hang in the balance, I dissent," she wrote.

LINK
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems SCOTUS has learned the art of releasing "bad" news late on a Friday.

And poor KBJ. She is going be wearing a sombrero if she keeps writing these dumbarse dissents.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status for up to 600,000 Venezuelan immigrants, meaning some could ultimately be deported.
The court granted an emergency request filed by the Trump administration seeking to block a judge's ruling that said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem failed to follow the correct process in revoking Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans.

Quote:

The court's three liberal justices dissented.
One of them, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote a dissenting opinion criticizing the court for once again granting an emergency request filed by the Trump administration, as it has done in 20 other cases.
"I cannot abide our repeated, gratuitous, and harmful interference with cases pending in the lower courts while lives hang in the balance, I dissent," she wrote.

LINK

Good. If you cannot abide it, then quit and let somebody with a lick of judicial knowledge take your position.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status for up to 600,000 Venezuelan immigrants, meaning some could ultimately be deported.
The court granted an emergency request filed by the Trump administration seeking to block a judge's ruling that said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem failed to follow the correct process in revoking Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans.

Quote:

The court's three liberal justices dissented.
One of them, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote a dissenting opinion criticizing the court for once again granting an emergency request filed by the Trump administration, as it has done in 20 other cases.
"I cannot abide our repeated, gratuitous, and harmful interference with cases pending in the lower courts while lives hang in the balance, I dissent," she wrote.

LINK


She is so dumb. Biden's biggest DEI hire.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status for up to 600,000 Venezuelan immigrants, meaning some could ultimately be deported.
The court granted an emergency request filed by the Trump administration seeking to block a judge's ruling that said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem failed to follow the correct process in revoking Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans.

Quote:

The court's three liberal justices dissented.
One of them, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote a dissenting opinion criticizing the court for once again granting an emergency request filed by the Trump administration, as it has done in 20 other cases.
"I cannot abide our repeated, gratuitous, and harmful interference with cases pending in the lower courts while lives hang in the balance, I dissent," she wrote.

LINK

Quote:

"I cannot abide our repeated, gratuitous, and harmful interference with cases pending in the lower courts while lives hang in the balance, I dissent," she wrote.


Translated....

Because of feelings, I DISSENT!!!!!
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status for up to 600,000 Venezuelan immigrants, meaning some could ultimately be deported.
The court granted an emergency request filed by the Trump administration seeking to block a judge's ruling that said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem failed to follow the correct process in revoking Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans.

Quote:

The court's three liberal justices dissented.
One of them, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote a dissenting opinion criticizing the court for once again granting an emergency request filed by the Trump administration, as it has done in 20 other cases.
"I cannot abide our repeated, gratuitous, and harmful interference with cases pending in the lower courts while lives hang in the balance, I dissent," she wrote.

LINK


She is so dumb. Biden's biggest DEI hire.

There's a reason why she's said more words during the SCOTUS cases than most of the justices who have been there for YEARS before....
CatD11Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:





Put him in a men's prison, they will make him a girl.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.