***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

288,159 Views | 2892 Replies | Last: 32 sec ago by techno-ag
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Gee...

Who had a district judge ruling against Trump on their bingo card?

Well, I mean, except for everyone on planet Earth?
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




Fine. Let it burn. Seriously. It's time for a city to burn to the ground. The courts don't want to protect the citizens? Then own it when the city burns.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Close and relocate a federal facilities. Cut all the funding. Leave the post office and that's it. No more road money, no more discretionary funds of any kind. Project? Oh sorry those funds are held up. We will pay you... when you get a court order. Court is delayed moving to the other side of the Rockies.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crosspost from the Portland thread.

Thread. Judge's feelings trump Trump's Article II authority. Judge said NO FEDERALIZING ANY NG to Oregon.

Nothing new... Judges think they ARE the President and can base Article II powers on how they feel.


...

...


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have they agreed to hear a merits case on birthright citizenship? Missed that.

I'm Gipper
CatD11Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If not Bondi, someone needs to deal with this one.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/breaking-appeals-court-lifts-judges-order-blocking-trump/
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thread on 9th Circuit Federalizing troops to Oregon.




Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Biden appointee of course.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meh

"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Founders had great wisdom and foresight.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She said it about more than just journalists.

"...press, protestors, or religious practitioners..."

samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meaningless TRO
SPF250
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Please identify the protesters and religious practitioners who were party to said lawsuit?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dvldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kyle Cheney is a leftist hack, but he's still plugged in to things. He's a good follow for breaking news but you have to filter out his partisan commentary.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dvldog said:

Kyle Cheney is a leftist hack, but he's still plugged in to things. He's a good follow for breaking news but you have to filter out his partisan commentary.


Fair assessment


For the most part, he stays neutral and just does reporting. But when he does commentary, you can't help but push liberal talking points


A good follow though. Lots of timely info.

I'm Gipper
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



This has to be the path forward for the Federal Government.

We need to hit the pocketbooks of offenders, from protestors attacking ICE to NGO board members who were paid to pilfer money to bureaucrats that received lobby money that subsequently broke additional federal laws.

The Trump DOJ is crafty and picks its battles wisely, but civil / criminal forfeiture needs to be a credible threat against malicious rent-seekers within the government.

The civil forfeiture laws are EXTREMELY one sided to favor the government. If the GOP doesn't use them first, we will see them polished and ready to draw blood at the first Dem opportunity. A better strategy is to lean hard on them now, and let the judiciary and possibly congress take the teeth out of them before power turns over.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It literally written into the statute! This isn't anything unusual or crafty.
Quote:

(2)The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a violation of, or a conspiracy to violate
(A)
section....1014... of this title, affecting a financial institution, or

shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the person obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation.

18 USC 982

I'm Gipper
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

It literally written into the statute! This isn't anything unusual or crafty.
Quote:

(2)The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a violation of, or a conspiracy to violate
(A)
section....1014... of this title, affecting a financial institution, or

shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the person obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation.

18 USC 982

It's not unusual for sure. But it is usually used against people that don't have the money to fight, or where the amount confiscated isn't worth the legal bills to recover.

My comment about the Trump DOJ is that they rarely overplay their hand. They are much better at making the other side overtip THEIR hand and getting B-slapped by SCOTUS.

We even have a special department in Treasury whose sole expertise is civil and criminal forfeiture. We need to let these guys loose on criminal bureaucrats in a crippling way, in cases that have venue outside of DC. Get these guys to quit focusing on corporate shake-downs and drug runners, and get them focused on people stealing from the US government.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We already know the 2020 census was falsified. We are operating as if it weren't. It isn't even in question. Texas lost representation that California and New York have (illegally).
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

CatD11Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would fear being struck down if I lied this brazenly.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Coming home to roost for some of those shenanigans?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

A federal grand jury convened Wednesday afternoon to consider charges against former national security adviser John Bolton over his alleged sharing of highly sensitive classified materials on a private email server, The Post has learned.
The proceeding comes two months after FBI agents raided Bolton's suburban Maryland home and Washington, DC office in search of evidence in the Trump critic's purported theft of "highly sensitive national security" information.
Justice Department officials expect an indictment to be handed up either Wednesday or Thursday, with one telling The Post the case against the 76-year-old is "air tight."

LINK
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More in the article below.



Quote:

...

But the citation in the quote above is, for the most part, a middle-finger to the Supreme Court -- it basically means they may have overruled her and found she was likely wrong in her earlier view of the Administration's conduct, be she is intervening this time with a TRO on different grounds. Because the Supreme Court's prior order was not based on a different reason, she's free to ignore what they did before in this new case.

One thing that I have seen in other cases that is true in this case as well -- when entering the TRO and later Prelim. Injunction, the obstructionist judges are not doing so on all the claims raised in the Complaint. They deliberately leave 2 or 3 counts out as the basis upon which the TRO/Injunction was issued. The judge on the Venezuelan TPS cases did the same thing. What this allows is flexibility that -- if reversed -- the Plaintiffs can come back to the district judge and seek another TRO/Injunction on the claims that were not relied upon the first time around.

Judge Illston didn't do that here as she ended up with the same plaintiffs filing a new complaint based on the shutdown. But in her earlier TRO she had left 3 of the 7 claims raised in the complaint unaddressed when she issued the TRO -- just in case.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.