***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

288,567 Views | 2896 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Ellis Wyatt
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:37a, 10/17/25
AG
... when is enough going to be enough? Lower courts actively thumbing their nose at the Supreme Court and nobody is being held to account.
Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:26a, 10/17/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
1
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:36a, 10/17/25
AG
Somebody's paralegal using AI to fill in citations?
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:41a, 10/17/25
If you are using AI to do any filings/arguments/etc you need to be disbarred. Peoples lives or liberties could be at stake.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
4
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 11:44a, 10/17/25
txags92 said:
Somebody's paralegal using AI to fill in citations?


Very unlikely!!

The lawyer did this themselves, and we say it was just a draft not meant to be filed. We have seen this several times across the country. Stupid stupid stupid

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 11:56a, 10/17/25
AG
Im Gipper said:
txags92 said:
Somebody's paralegal using AI to fill in citations?


Very unlikely!!

The lawyer did this themselves, and we say it was just a draft not meant to be filed. We have seen this several times across the country. Stupid stupid stupid

I am just not sure how you come up with actual text from a citation when both the cited rule and the text do not exist. AI has been known to make stuff up out of thin air when it can't find actual references to cite.
Reply Quote
1
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 11:57a, 10/17/25
I am not sure I follow your question, but you just cut and paste what ChatGPT gives you.

It will state a proposition of law and then cite a made up case.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 12:01p, 10/17/25
AG
txags92 said:
Somebody's paralegal using AI to fill in citations?

It's more likely that someone re-used a draft from a different district that actually has these local rules, and didn't change the citation to the local rules for the germane district.

Very, very sloppy if true, but not as bad as using AI, I would say.
Reply Quote
1
japantiger
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 12:04p, 10/17/25
S
BusterAg said:
txags92 said:
Somebody's paralegal using AI to fill in citations?

It's more likely that someone re-used a draft from a different district that actually has these local rules, and didn't change the citation to the local rules for the germane district.

Very, very sloppy if true, but not as bad as using AI, I would say.

So just incompetent, not unethical.
Reply Quote
2
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to japantiger • 2:17p, 10/17/25
AG
japantiger said:
BusterAg said:
txags92 said:
Somebody's paralegal using AI to fill in citations?

It's more likely that someone re-used a draft from a different district that actually has these local rules, and didn't change the citation to the local rules for the germane district.

Very, very sloppy if true, but not as bad as using AI, I would say.

So just incompetent, not unethical.

Yeah.

I have actually seen that in a brief once upon a time way before AI. Council cited a local rule for CAND in TXED. Both courts have special local rules related to patent infringement cases, and many of TXED local rules are adopted from CAND, but they are not the same.

But, it was one citation, not a host of them, so the present instance may or may not have been AI abuse.
Reply Quote
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 5:58p, 10/17/25
AG
Im Gipper said:
I am not sure I follow your question, but you just cut and paste what ChatGPT gives you.

It will state a proposition of law and then cite a made up case.

It's called a hallucination....

I've had numerous ones in the past year. It's why I ALWAYS proofread what it puts out.
Reply Quote
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 7:34p, 10/17/25
AG
Im Gipper said:
I am not sure I follow your question, but you just cut and paste what ChatGPT gives you.

It will state a proposition of law and then cite a made up case.

I was objecting to how an actual human could come up with actual text from a fictional citation if they were not using AI.
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:45p, 10/17/25
I guess Judges control.internal policies of executive branch now in ref to second tweet.


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:07p, 10/17/25
AG
will25u said:
I guess Judges control.internal policies of executive branch now in ref to second tweet.



Tell the judge since the cameras are her order, she can dip into her funds and pay for them.
Reply Quote
8
Get Off My Lawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 5:49a, 10/18/25
txags92 said:
will25u said:
I guess Judges control.internal policies of executive branch now in ref to second tweet.



Tell the judge since the cameras are her order, she can dip into her funds and pay for them.
Nah. Don't give her the illusion she has any power here. Robed activists shouldn't be encouraged.
Reply Quote
7
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:21a, 10/18/25
Better yet, declare these judges as nonessential and send them and staff home without pay.
Reply Quote
9
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:55a, 10/18/25
AG
Every day I think - 'wow, the federal judiciary couldn't be more out of control' - and every morning another judge takes a sledgehammer to the legitimacy of the judicial branch.
Reply Quote
11
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Deerdude • 7:00a, 10/18/25
AG
Deerdude said:
Better yet, declare these judges as nonessential and send them and staff home without pay.


I deal with the federal judiciary. They sent a note out yesterday saying that due to the shutdown they will be closing courts as soon as next week.

Could be part of the play by team Trump.
Reply Quote
7
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 8:24a, 10/18/25
AG
Aggie Jurist said:
Every day I think - 'wow, the federal judiciary couldn't be more out of control' - and every morning another judge takes a sledgehammer to the legitimacy of the judicial branch.

Incredibly disheartening, isn't it?

To paraphrase Gorsuch, good judges do not always personally agree with all of their decisions because the law is foremost.

Today's federal judges put their personal political agendas and feelings before the law.
Reply Quote
15
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 11:06a, 10/18/25
AG
To what end? Does it reach a point where we see sanctions / removals?

Sadly, I don't see it, but what I do see are some unintended consequences. Do we start seeing cases like Little v Hecox, VRA, etc backfiring because they pushed too far and now a conservative Supreme Court is going to set precedents? Hell, that Judge in Illinois forcing the Federal government's hand is probably going to backfire and set hard guardrails ... massive overreach, and if I am being honest, I don't like anyone doing stupid **** that erodes State's rights even if, in this instance, I want him slapped into oblivion.
Reply Quote
1
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:10a, 10/18/25
As long as it gets manipulated for an easy TEXIT, I'm in.
Reply Quote
1
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:10a, 10/18/25
AG
will25u said:
I guess Judges control.internal policies of executive branch now in ref to second tweet.




The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
4
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:13a, 10/18/25
Clip camera inside ballistics vest, for safety.
Reply Quote
2
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:16a, 10/18/25
Tell her to piss off she has ZERO authority.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Reply Quote
11
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:46p, 10/18/25

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:10p, 10/19/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
5
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:56p, 10/19/25
Isn't assuming command from the rightful CO called mutiny or some such?
Reply Quote
11
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:24p, 10/20/25
I am sure en banc is coming.


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
VarkAg77
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Deerdude • 3:30p, 10/20/25
AG
Deerdude said:
Isn't assuming command from the rightful CO called mutiny or some such?


I'm sure they haven't (because they can't take over another branch of government) "taken command" of a military unit. Probably just issued another injunction.
Reply Quote
4
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:37p, 10/20/25
AG
Smartmatic's parent company indicted in South Florida for bribery, money laundering, etc.

Eleven minute recap by Gouveia.
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:58p, 10/20/25


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:42a, 10/21/25
They didn't want it to go to SCOTUS, so they dropped it. But that is not how it works. Now SCOTUS WILL hear it.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:46a, 10/21/25


Quote:
Well, the judge in the Comey case already making clear he will nit pick everything from the Trump DOJ to the point of sounding absurd.

This is from Judge Michael Nachmanoff's order yesterday denying US Attorney Lindsey Halligan's request to expedite approval of a filter team to review potentially privileged materials in the case.

Keep in mind--Patrick Fitzgerald was brought on board on Sept 29. Comey was arraigned on Oct 8 after which Nachmanoff set a motion schedule with Oct 20 deadline.

Halligan's first motion related to a filter team was Oct 13 then entered an motion to expedite on Oct 19.

Yet Nachmanoff expected the DOJ to prepare a proposal for a filter team immediately?...before the indictment?...before the arraignment...??--because the government (not under Trump mind you) has had the evidence pursuant to another investigation for years?

And Nachmanoff claims Fitzgerald's conflict was obvious years ago because of the 2019 DOJ IG report identifying him as a conduit in Comey's leak of confidential, and in some instances, classified information?

This is ABSURD. And it reminds me of the time Judge Chutkan told Trump's attorneys in the J6 cases they should have been reading discovery evidence in the case BEFORE the indictment to prepare for trial--referring to the J6 committee report and news coverage.

Hopefully a motion to recuse is forthcoming.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:32p, 10/21/25
AG
One good thing about Trump's second term is the defanging of the judiciary. These federal judges have only been able to delay his agenda slightly. They certainly haven't been able to stop him. Now everyone can see that.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
6
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 2:32p, 10/21/25
Julie is the last person to go to for legal analysis. She is consistently flat out wrong and has no clue on most legal standards

Motion to recuse? For standard orders? Makes no sense whatsoever.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.