Tksymm7 said:
Giannis is who I think they'd be after. As I said above I don't think Kyrie gets them to top four in the east and competing to make the finals. They need more.
On the other hand, I think Kyrie gets the Hawks to top four in the East and competing to make the ECF and Finals, so long as the Hawks are the same team we saw in the second half of the season and playoffs.
I think Atlanta would prefer Dyson Daniels at $25 mm/year for next 4 years over the Kyrie contract situation.
There are 2 oft-injured, entertaining PGs that appear to be on the trade market this year. They both play for WC teams that have no shot to compete for the Southwest division title, much less the WC title, and both make $39-43 MM/year. Their presence on the trade market de-values the other one.
So any team that wants them could choose:
A - Kyrie
B - Ja
and my guess is most teams would choose
C -
Neither, barring draft capital given in order to take them in.
However, if needing realistic landing spots: Chicago or, Toronto; Minnesota in a major multi-team deal.
I'd list Miami if Pat Riley actually could stomach PGs who are sporadic in availability or guards not available for the playoffs.
Utah - if they somehow got Dybantsa, and if they want to win now.
Cleveland - If they are tearing down and getting out of 2nd apron and need a radical change. Would need multiple teams and some real creativity.
Milwaukee - if and only if it is demanded by Giannis in order to stay. Or sent there as part of contract filler.