Guard
6′6″
/
215 lbs
Washington DC, DC
Jackson-Reed
Freshman (RS)
5 Thoughts: UCF 64, No. 13 Texas A&M 61
No. 13 Texas A&M failed to hold off the UCF Knights late, dropping its first season-opener in 23 years. Following the disappointing loss, Luke Evangelist shares his biggest takeaways from the Maroon & White's showing.
32:05
15 days ago by
Luke Evangelist
On Sunday afternoon in Houston, the Texas A&M Aggies and Houston Cougars met for a charity exhibition benefitting the Greater Houston Disaster Alliance Hurricane Beryl Recovery Fund. The Coogs defeated the Aggies at the Fertitta Center, 79-64.
18 days ago by
Luke Evangelist
With names like Andersson Garcia, Solomon Washington and Henry Coleman III back for more, Texas A&M's front returns 89 percent of its rebounding and 93 percent of its scoring from last season. Ahead of 2024-25, Luke Evangelist analyzes what he sees from the Aggie bigs.
Texas A&M looks to maintain status as nation's top rebounding team
Though relatively undersized, Texas A&M's frontcourt is more than skilled and experienced enough to help the Aggies lead the country in total rebounding once again. David Sandhop evaluates the team's big men in this installment of the summer preview series.
Looking ahead and trying to project Texas A&M's 2024-25 hoops roster
Tyrece Radford is among a trio of Aggies that have exhausted their eligibility, but Texas A&M could return upwards of 70 percent of their offensive production next season in the remainder of the core returns following back-to-back NCAA Tournament berths.
All Updates
3/28/2024
Reed Report: Taking stock of Texas A&M's 2023-2024 campaign
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.
