Defensive Lineman
6′2″
/
325 lbs
Richland, NJ
St. Augustine Prep
Junior
1/17/2024
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
1/5/2024
Ask Liucci: Coaching staff thoughts, Texas A&M's portal push & more
1/3/2024
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Wednesday, January 3)
10/5/2023
Ask Liucci: Magnitude of Ags-Tide along the SEC Western front & more
8/28/2023
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Monday, August 28)
8/27/2023
The Loochador Podcast: A position-by-position breakdown of the Ags
8/9/2023
A healthy Gabriel Brownlow-Dindy is 'hungry' for redemption in 2023
8/4/2023
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Friday, August 4)
8/4/2022
22 Players in 22 Days: #17 Isaiah Raikes
3/3/2022
Fisher eagerly anticipating competition that spring practices will bring
9/9/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Competition at wideout, young guys to watch & more
6/24/2020
Jordan Pugh analyzes the 2020 Texas A&M defensive tackles
5/5/2020
Commit Breakdown: Liucci goes in-depth on new commit Victory Vaka
4/30/2020
Liucci: Aggies continue to stack talent on defensive side of the ball
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.