Defensive Back
6′1″
/
205 lbs
Richmond, TX
Fort Bend Bush
Junior
Defense in Review: Texas A&M 20, Auburn 3
Billy Liucci deep dives another absolutely suffocating performance by the Wrecking Crew, which held a hot Bo Nix and Auburn to three points and produced the game's only touchdown in Texas A&M's 20-3 victory.
Ask Liucci, Part 2: Offensive development, outlook for remaining schedule & more
Following an unexpected loss to Arkansas last Saturday, many questions surround the Aggie football program and how they can move forward from here. In this edition of Ask Liucci, Billy answers some of those questions, shares his outlook for the rest of the season and more.
37:15
Correcting offensive line issues crucial for A&M's running game
Although the Aggies are 3-0 and ranked seventh in the nation, their rushing attack has sputtered at times and against weaker opponents. On Monday, head coach Jimbo Fisher said the issues are easily identifiable and should be easy to correct.
Cover Story: Season opener a launching point for 2021 A&M team
Despite some expected and unexpected bumps along the way, the season opener for the 2021 Aggies offered a glimpse of what Jimbo Fisher's team can do as mistakes are corrected and young players grow more comfortable.
No. 6 Aggies not looking past Kent State, focused on improving each day
Texas A&M hosts Kent State at Kyle Field on Saturday night as the sixth-ranked Aggies officially open the 2021 season. Leading up to the game, the Maroon & White say they're not even focused on the Golden Flashes, rather just getting better each day leading up to kickoff.
All Updates
6/3/2021
McGee, McCoy & Swope: Drafting the 2021 Aggies categorically
3/29/2021
Spring Camp Five in Five: Pivotal Spring
8/19/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: WR and S competitions, growth of Aggie sports & more
8/6/2020
Jamie McCoy excited for Anthony Hines to take the next step in 2020
8/2/2020
The Afterparty, Part 2: Aggies in pro sports, most improved position in Jimbo era
7/13/2020
30 Players in 30 Days: #30 — Erick Young
6/19/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Previewing A&M's pass rush, Coley's recruiting impact & more
4/30/2020
Liucci: Aggies continue to stack talent on defensive side of the ball
3/27/2020
Aggie Football #1-99: Breaking down jerseys numbers 13 & 14
5/20/2019
Either/Or: Which A&M freshmen make the biggest impact in 2019
4/8/2019
By Position: Analyzing A&M's Secondary
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.