Here's what I posted in the other thread:
From what I understand, the SMU coaches disputed the result, so the officials consulted the buttons, which said the kid from SMU won.
The ruling on whether there's supremacy in the touchpad is basically when there's greater than .3 difference between some combination of the buttons, touchpads, and stopwatches, then the results must be investigated and adjusted, if the officials find a reasonable issue.
It's really complicated once you get into how they adjust the times, so if you really want to read it, go to page 60 of the NCAA rule book. The gist is that if it's a 1 lane error, they figure which of the backups is valid (buttons or watch), and adjust that time by the average error between that same backup (buttons or watch) and the touchpad in all other lanes.
If the issue is deemed to be in the electronic timing of the whole heat, then whatever backup (buttons or watch) is deemed reliable for every lane is adjusted by the average of the errors of all lanes between the backup (buttons or watch) and what the touchpads actually registered.
Clear as mud?
The rule book is online here: scroll down to page 61 of the PDF. they have examples and all.
http://www.ncaapublications.com/Uploads/PDF/Swimming_Diving_ReadyforWeb7b42da3b-b35a-43bd-bba0-0b7323b5561b.pdfWe can only assume that the officials used correct procedure, and the discrepancy probably came from one of the Kines 199 all-stars doing the manual timing. It happens. At least it wasn't a qualifying cut, because then it likely wouldnt've counted because there were only 2 timers for each lane.
If anyone wants clarification of "what if this had happened or this or this" just post a response and I'll do my best to answer.
[This message has been edited by gobluwolverine (edited 1/31/2009 11:05a).]