Comparing this case to the OJ Simpson case is laughable. Unless you are comparing them from the stand point that all DNA evidence pointed without a shadow of doubt that OJ was guilty, while in this case there is absolutely no DNA evidence to back her story.
In addition, one of the people indicted has a solid alibi for the attacks.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/LegalCenter/story?id=1858806&page=1"So, Seligmann's alibi suggests, he and the alleged victim were in the house together for less than 20 minutes [time frame confirmed by a taxi driver and bank records]. According to defense sources, based on the alleged victim's affidavit, all of the following would have transpired within that time period: She and her dance partner performed for several minutes, left after feeling threatened by the boys' growing "excited and aggressive," returned after being persuaded by team members to dance some more, and then she was forced into a bathroom, beaten and raped.
Within those same minutes, phone bill records reviewed by ABC show that the defendant's cell phone made at least two outgoing calls."
Couple other points:
*She claims she was sober before the party and perhaps she was drugged to make her drunk as reported by the police officer who first responded to her 911 call, yet she can positively id the attackers and no evidence of date rape drugs were found?
*Her description of the attacker(s) were extremely vague.
*The DA appears to have assumed that the attackers had to be a member of the lacrosse team, yet there were non-lacrosse players there.
*The store employee and responding officer said that she did not appear to have been raped in their opinion (obviously not dispositive, but another small piece of evidence against her claim)..
*The accuser is a felon (or at least possibly attempted to run over a police officer while driving twice over the legal limit).
*The accused are not felons.
Despite the significant public pressure induced by the DA, to this date no one at the party (with a lot of people that could get in trouble) have said it happened.
*The other stripper did not claim any harm done
*Time stamped photos may show that she already had bruises on her body when she arrived at the the party (viewing those bruises is probably why the DA jumped to the conclusion that it happened).
...This case is slowly crumbling against the weight of all evidence. The DA has truly acted in an irresponsible and unethical manner in this case.
Interesting article on the race baiting going on..
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/04/fact_and_myth_duke_it_out.html[This message has been edited by Aston04 (edited 4/19/2006 9:44a).]