BoB is my number 1. Watched it several times in the last 15 yrs. But damn if THE PACIFIC hasn't grown on me. Way more brutal and just plain depressing. Great job on both series.
Private.Ragoo said:
Snafu
This part hits me at home. I grew up hunting and around guns my entire life, but a few years ago had a situation while out on a run with my wife where we ran into a woman who attempted suicide with a shotgun as we ran by. Fast forward a year or two, I have major anxiety issues around guns now. Used to be something I truly enjoyed and basically have panic attacks around them now. Its incredibly hard to deal with since its something that was basically a lifestyle for my family and friends.Stive said:
Really well put.
The "Why We Fight" episode of BoB made me choke up once. The final episode of The Pacific chokes me up once (when the dad is standing outside the room in the middle of the night) and makes me almost full on lose it a separate time (the hunting scene). And that happens every time I've watched it.
They're both great....just different approaches.
Same here. My dad still doesn't quite understand what is going on, but he has tried to help. Definitely from the "rub some dirt on it and man up" generation. I think it really clicked to him when I returned the guns I owned to him to keep hold of. I legitimately couldn't have them in the house. Thankfully my parents are great people so when I go home, we just talk about ranching and farming and he won't go into hunting unless I bring it up.Quote:
I basically grew up with a gun in my hand (pellet gun, graduating to a .22 and a 20 gauge), and quail hunting was our primary household father-son time.
Anyone who wants to start arguing the merits of the two nukes at the end of the war need to watch and understand The Pacific campaigns and watch the series....especially as the islands got closer and close to mainland Japan, culminating in Okinawa. Multiply that campaign x100 and that's the invasion of Japan....minus any actual beaches to land on or close canal to cross to stage the landings. It would have been horrific.Max Power said:
I rewatch Band of Brothers every year, it's my favorite movie, tv, miniseries, etc about WWII. I've read the book as well and it's outstanding too. I've only watched The Pacific once, but I've read With The Old Breed, which is one of two books The Pacific was based on.
Band of Brothers vs The Pacific is an apples to oranges comparison. The Pacific is a lot closer to Vietnam in terms of warfare and troop experience than it is to the war being fought in Europe during WWII. It doesn't lend itself well to film because of the nature of the battles. It wouldn't shock me if the PTSD suffered by troops in The Pacific was higher than their European counterparts if such research existed. There's a lot more optimism in Band of Brothers, the feeling of accomplishment as they advanced through battles. There's none of that in The Pacific. Spending endless nights in foxholes, the smell of rotting corpses and coconuts, getting cut up by coral, being unable to dig in, fighting an enemy that seemed unkillable and didn't abide by traditional tactics or fight in a way that valued their own lives. It's easy to romanticize the European front, far from it on the Pacific. When you were relieved from duty you just go back to a ship, which was no picnic either, just waiting to be redeployed right back where you came from seemingly in perpetuity.
I do not wish to have experienced either front personally, but if you loaded up one vs the other, The Pacific was a more brutal experience than Europe for the soldiers. Pretty tough to make them comparative experiences on film, because they weren't. I'd venture to say plenty of the soldiers from The Pacific would have gladly traded places for a spot in Europe.
But I do think The Pacific serves as an incredibly important counterpart to Band of Brothers. It illustrates what the futility of war looks like compared with what is more commonly seen as the glory on the other side of the world. It's less rewatchable due to the source material, which isn't something you would want to take in annually.
It's messed up to talk about Texas Tech like that.Eliminatus said:
It is almost apples to oranges to me.
BoB is a feel good story of good triumphing over evil in set piece battles, literally and figuratively. It is the story of a unit on a righteous campaign.
The Pacific is a harsh lesson of fighting a dehumanized enemy in some of the worst conditions imaginable. It follows individuals and their battles with the enemy and themselves.
BoB is incredible in it's way of detailing the fight to take down the Nazis. The Pacific is incredible in detailing the horrors of war and what it does to the psyche of the warriors fighting it. Some of the scenes I will never forget. Two in particular. Basilones Jap rant in the Quonset hut and SNAFU gunning down that Japanese soldier while screaming at him to ****ing die over and over. I swear I felt that to my very bones. Incredible acting and cinematography.
I love both so much, but the Pacific will always resonate far more with me on a personal level as someone who also faced an honorless enemy that you hated like cockroaches.
If you ever do, Point-du-Hoc and the village Sainte-Mre-glise (where the paratrooper got hung up on the church steeple) are the must-sees. Out of all the sights, those are the places where you really get a feel for what the soldiers on both sides might have experienced. The shell craters on Point-du-Hoc are absolutely massive and I can't imagine what it was like being a german soldier having to endure that. And there are still bullet holes in the church in Sainte-Mre-glise.Max Power said:
I've been to the Pearl Harbor Memorial, and Arlington National Cemetery but I really want to go to France. It's on my bucket list. One of these days when my daughter is old enough to hopefully understand the gravity of those places I want to take her.