https://variety.com/2021/music/news/bruce-springsteen-sells-catalog-sony-500-million-1235134590/
Good work if you can get it.
Good work if you can get it.
Why can't things in New Jersey, stay in New Jersey.oragator said:
https://variety.com/2021/music/news/bruce-springsteen-sells-catalog-sony-500-million-1235134590/
Good work if you can get it.
Tweeter & The Monkey Man: coming in 2029!AliasMan02 said:
Now Sony can finally move on from Spider-Man and create the Springsteen Cinematic Universe we've all been craving.
Tibbers said:Why can't things in New Jersey, stay in New Jersey.oragator said:
https://variety.com/2021/music/news/bruce-springsteen-sells-catalog-sony-500-million-1235134590/
Good work if you can get it.
C@LAg said:true. Springsteen is a solid album seller at present (and fantastic concert draw), but to date he is not an evergreen artist like the Beatles or Led Zeppelin that seem to find an ongoing new audience every decade.Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.
I guess Sony can now regularly pimp out his songs for commercial, movies, etc.
Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.
C@LAg said:
Additionally, there is a movement in Washington to increase capital gains taxes above their current 20% level. So, Springsteen could be looking to make a deal before the end of the year, Billboard said.
He talks like he is lower, working class, but sure acts like the top 1%
Proposition Joe said:Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.
Because Sony believes there's at least an extra $5m a year that can be squeezed out via streaming and other modern platforms. Likely more.
rononeill said:Proposition Joe said:Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.
Because Sony believes there's at least an extra $5m a year that can be squeezed out via streaming and other modern platforms. Likely more.
So they're buying at a 5cap. you can buy this or a 1mm sf office building in a major city.
Quote:
So they're buying at a 5cap. you can buy this or a 1mm sf office building in a major city.
C@LAg said:
Additionally, there is a movement in Washington to increase capital gains taxes above their current 20% level. So, Springsteen could be looking to make a deal before the end of the year, Billboard said.
He talks like he is lower, working class, but sure acts like the top 1%
Yeah that sucked.YouBet said:
I do not recommend his recent Netflix(?) special where he does monologues while singing and in between songs.
It's terrible.
I'll take both and then throw his annoying ass off the office building.rononeill said:Proposition Joe said:Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.
Because Sony believes there's at least an extra $5m a year that can be squeezed out via streaming and other modern platforms. Likely more.
So they're buying at a 5cap. you can buy this or a 1mm sf office building in a major city.
Furlock Bones said:
He's full of ***** Who would have guessed.
Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.
Because it's not a depreciating asset like a building.Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.
Philo B 93 said:
Why would they pay $500 million for an asset that brings in $22.5 million per year? That will take 20 years to recoup if he stays as popular as he is today for 20 more years.