SpaceX and other space news updates

1,810,730 Views | 18547 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by nortex97
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Isaacman confirmed to head NASA.

OKCAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great for him!

Tangential to his nomination, but I've always wondered how stiff the SpaceX suits are under pressure. His arms don't look natural at all in that video of his spacewalk.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
normaleagle05 said:

Isaacman confirmed to head NASA.



normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OKCAg2002 said:

Great for him!

Tangential to his nomination, but I've always wondered how stiff the SpaceX suits are under pressure. His arms don't look natural at all in that video of his spacewalk.

I don't know if the suit is affecting his arm position, but I also don't know how it would hang in zero G. Might be full attention, just shorter.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


LOL Nice
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
normaleagle05 said:

OKCAg2002 said:

Great for him!

Tangential to his nomination, but I've always wondered how stiff the SpaceX suits are under pressure. His arms don't look natural at all in that video of his spacewalk.

I don't know if the suit is affecting his arm position, but I also don't know how it would hang in zero G. Might be full attention, just shorter.

That was the first test of an EVA suit built by SpaceX. Mobility was absolutely something they were concerned about and testing.

Outwardly the suit looks like the other SpaceX suits, but my understanding is that it is/was a completely redesigned suit.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lofty goals.

normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oops. Won't buff out, but it will come down quickly.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Moonbase Alpha gets a priority from WH. Also, somehow apple spellcheck thinks "Moonbase" means Normandy which I am not sure how to interpret.


Whatever, I'll take it, even if it is only 'intermittently' manned.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is the weight of one of Elon's boring machines? Maybe the first moonbase is underground?
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
100%. People should realise just how autistically focused Elon is on Mars. SpaceX? Getting to Mars. Tesla? Getting around on Mars with no need for gas. Boring Company? Drilling into Mars soil where there's water. Optimus robots? Non-human habitat builders on Mars. Starlink? Internet and data connectivity to Mars.

The moonshot is just a NASA-funded dress rehearsal.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there ultra-pure ketamine on Mars? That may be a missing link here.

He is singularly focused on getting there. I don't think it's the key to humanity like he does and try to reconcile that with his obsession over birth rates.

But to date the only thing that has stopped Elon from achieving is the federal bureaucracy.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bthotugigem05 said:

100%. People should realise just how autistically focused Elon is on Mars. SpaceX? Getting to Mars. Tesla? Getting around on Mars with no need for gas. Boring Company? Drilling into Mars soil where there's water. Optimus robots? Non-human habitat builders on Mars. Starlink? Internet and data connectivity to Mars.

The moonshot is just a NASA-funded dress rehearsal.

I was just having that conversation today with a couple of coworkers. One of them was saying he thought Elon was trying to consolidate power over everybody. I told them he doesn't care about having power over anybody. He just wants to go to Mars. Everything he does and all his technologies are aimed at making life on Mars possible.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only key to humanity Elon claimed for a self sustaining Mars colony is for the longevity of humanity. I don't think he's ever claimed any big benefits to humanity other than that.

It's a backup plan in case we nuke ourselves, or an asteroid ends life on Earth or globalists/marxists take over Earth, whatever...
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Living on Mars is a pipe dream. We're not evolved for it. We can't even populate the poles. We're not going to populate Mars. A handful of humans on a suicide mission, sure. But even so much as a small village or tribe? Never, at least not for another few centuries.

All resources will have to shipped from Earth. That's going to take a looong time to build up infrastructure to have a permanent human presence.

There is also no incentive for any government or private entity to fund building Mars infrastructure or terraforming of Mars. Without incentive it will never have enough support to occur. Maybe if you can play Bitcoin miners or data centers on Mars, then you'd get some incentive, but wouldn't Earth's orbit be lower cost for those?
rynning
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

There is also no incentive for any government or private entity to fund building Mars infrastructure or terraforming of Mars. Without incentive it will never have enough support to occur.
I believe Elon is a private entity, and he's already stated his incentive.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
humans have a knack of making the inhospitable or outright deadly be "livable" in one way or another. It would be a rough, no quarter given existence. But, if we are set on making it work then we will do it
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rynning said:

bmks270 said:

There is also no incentive for any government or private entity to fund building Mars infrastructure or terraforming of Mars. Without incentive it will never have enough support to occur.
I believe Elon is a private entity, and he's already stated his incentive.


His vision requires multiple lifetimes and he only has one. So his only hope of seeing his vision through may be some trust that outlives him dedicated to funding Mars exploration and research.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bthotugigem05 said:

100%. People should realise just how autistically focused Elon is on Mars. SpaceX? Getting to Mars. Tesla? Getting around on Mars with no need for gas. Boring Company? Drilling into Mars soil where there's water. Optimus robots? Non-human habitat builders on Mars. Starlink? Internet and data connectivity to Mars.

The moonshot is just a NASA-funded dress rehearsal.
The Boring Company swag page even offers this t-shirt for sale:


Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Elon singlehandedly drives us to the brink of Mars, I have zero doubts the next generation of potential Martians will be hellbent on finishing the job.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I tend to think the moon is a better option, contrary to what Elon thinks. We can develop the solutions needed there to populate other places without the huge cost of moving all the way to Mars plus the efficiency of closer to real time communication. It's also much more feasible for heavy industry there that can be used on earth or in earth's orbit that still helps humans here. I can't imagine anything being refined or manufactured on mars that would be sent back to Earth.

And if Elon's primary concern is human survival, there are few near term catastrophe's that could wipe out humanity where Mars is a better option than the moon. The moon has advantages there as well, namely that it is easier to get back to earth after said catastrophe.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

Living on Mars is a pipe dream. We're not evolved for it. We can't even populate the poles. We're not going to populate Mars. A handful of humans on a suicide mission, sure. But even so much as a small village or tribe? Never, at least not for another few centuries.

All resources will have to shipped from Earth. That's going to take a looong time to build up infrastructure to have a permanent human presence.

There is also no incentive for any government or private entity to fund building Mars infrastructure or terraforming of Mars. Without incentive it will never have enough support to occur. Maybe if you can play Bitcoin miners or data centers on Mars, then you'd get some incentive, but wouldn't Earth's orbit be lower cost for those?

I think you are way off on your timescale. If I had asked you in 2010 how long would it take for somebody to develop a rocket that could take off and land in the same place, be fully reusable, launch dozens of satellites at a time, and for one company to launch over 100 launches of a reusable orbital class rocket without a failure in the same year, would you have guessed that was less than 1.5 decades away?

We are not going to fly to Mars and setup a fully sustainable colony by 2030. But I fully expect it before 2050 and hope I am alive to see it. But you are accurate in that if we relied on NASA to accomplish it, your timeline would be accurate and we would never be able to afford it.

All of the tools to survive on Mars are there and what is needed can be imported. The use of underground tunnels for housing and ability to use robots and self driving vehicles for many of the tasks makes the previously unthinkable much more possible. Instead of sending out 5 guys in a capsule with some limited supplies and telling them to setup a mine for the raw materials we need; you send up a couple dozen starships with dozen of robots custom built for the tasks and have them set it up for you. All they need is power to recharge periodically, either through solar or nuclear and they can continue working without the need for food, oxygen, etc. They can build structures for gardens, plant seeds, drill for water, etc. All the things that will be necessary to make the place livable for humans can be done before we ever send the first colonists there. That future is coming much faster than you think. I don't feel like it is the "future of mankind" or any of that nonsense, but Elon has the money to make it happen, and the reusability/return capability of starship will make it feasible/economically viable.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

Living on Mars is a pipe dream. We're not evolved for it.

That's what Africans once said about Europe.

bmks270 said:

All resources will have to shipped from Earth. That's going to take a looong time to build up infrastructure to have a permanent human presence.


Not all resources. Mars has metals, air, water, solar energy.
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jkag89 said:

normaleagle05 said:


. . .




The Wright brothers are screaming faster Falkor!
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/12/russia-is-about-to-do-the-most-russia-thing-ever-with-its-next-space-station/


Lololol Russia has decided that their own space station will be made from their ISS core even tho parts are 30 years old.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



https://archive.is/2025.12.21-113457/https://www.wsj.com/business/airlines/the-spacex-explosion-that-put-flights-in-danger-016a79c0
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"More launches, more risk?
The FAA oversees planes navigating U.S. airspace and licenses commercial rocket launches, as well as missions where vehicles return to Earth from space.
Debris could become more of a safety risk as the pace of rocket launches increases."

Wrong. More launches = less risk. SpaceX isn't going to just continue to launch rockets and let them explode again and again without making changes. And that has happened. They aren't blowing up ship anymore in case it anyone hasn't noticed.

Launching reveals hazards which leads to corrections preventing hazards.
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
it is the typical beauraucratic mindset. the more petty paper pushing rule mongers the less dynamic the innovation
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:




https://archive.is/2025.12.21-113457/https://www.wsj.com/business/airlines/the-spacex-explosion-that-put-flights-in-danger-016a79c0

So whose fault is that? SpaceX and the FAA knew that there was the possibility of a vehicle failure. They created a special hazard zone and issued the NOTAM.

So did it need to be larger? Should the FAA requested/required a different launch time? Created a larger exclusion zone?

NASA and others have all blown up a lot of hardware over the years.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They needed a hotline to give them an instant heads up. But its been fixed and will continue to get better.
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tory Bruno resigned from his CEO slot at ULA
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bthotugigem05 said:

Tory Bruno resigned from his CEO slot at ULA


A capable guy. Wonder what he will do next. Not good for ULA at all.
First Page Refresh
Page 530 of 530
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.