State AGs Sue Over Musk Being Principle Officer

4,993 Views | 52 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Deerdude
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't know how this will go. Changing the agency(department?)Obama started could help Trump?

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A joke. Elon is doing nothing but looking at data. He's deciding nothing.

Mere obstruction. They hate their corruption being exposed.
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

A joke. Elon is doing nothing but looking at data. He's deciding nothing.

Mere obstruction. They hate their corruption being exposed.
Yep... so weird.

How does this not prove to the rest of the mostly undecided middle that the dems are crooks and do not want their gravy train fraud system of stealing tax payers money to stop?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Tell them give it up all this retroactive trying to undo authority. "If I have to simply copy-paste-letters from them and order them into effect, that's what is going to happen. If you are that much a crook -- go to Europe already. "
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Rex Racer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I suggested to my wife that the Treasury Secretary should just hire Musk as a Chief Auditor for $1 per year. Then he wouldn't need any confirmation or anything, and he would be an employee who has authority to look at everything.

Once Treasury is looked at, he resigns and the Secretary of Education hires him for $1 per year as Chief Auditor, and so on, and so on...
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

A joke. Elon is doing nothing but looking at data. He's deciding nothing.

Mere obstruction. They hate their corruption being exposed.
It's like watching drugs being taken suddenly away from an addict. The hard part hasn't even started yet but the mere prospect of withdrawal is driving them stark raving mad.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From NM….
sharpdressedman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anti-Trump lawsuits are quewed up all the way to the horizon.

Lawfare continues to be the Dems' most effective weapon available for the preservation of their agenda, absent physically eliminating PDJT.
up-n-aTm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't understand how these states can meddle in federal business. What am I missing?
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A lawsuit! Well they certainly have him now?
SA68AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Time for Bondi to reciprocate.

TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a known strategy and I guess their only strategy?
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Don't know how this will go. Changing the agency(department?)Obama started could help Trump?


Imagine resorting to lawfare to continue to screw the American people out of their tax dollars.

Their walls are truly closing in.....

This will not work out well for them.
UAS Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sharpdressedman said:

Anti-Trump lawsuits are quewed up all the way to the horizon.

Lawfare continues to be the Dems' most effective weapon available for the preservation of their agenda, absent physically eliminating PDJT.
Use the deep pockets of the FedGov to make them piss their money in the toilet. The DOJ has more money than all those *******s combined.

And, with the spigot of free money being turned off, a lot of these people and organizations that are suing are going to start having a hard time finding the funding for litigation.

This also means they have less money to do damage in other ways because they're having to spend their limited budgets on witch hunts...
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No standing

Am I doing it right Judge Roberts?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So presidents can't have advisors now?
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I shouldn't be but am constantly amazed at the reflexive "orange man bad" responses by the Left. Trump could be curing cancer and some blue state would sue him for pretending to be a doctor.

The Dems I guess are simply out of options. They are basically telling the American people we don't care about waste and fraud and abuse, we want it to continue. You should hate Trump and Elon for taking away our illicit criminal enterprises. And judging by the idiots on my Facebook feed there are a bunch buying it hook line and sinker.
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Again, they (Democrats) are mad at the person that is exposing wasteful spending rather than the actual wasteful spending.

(Posting this from a post I made a week ago)

Imagine someone witnesses a bank robbery and reports the robbery to you (as you are a person in charge of bank security). Rather than being upset that a robbery occurred, being upset at who committed the robbery, or wondering how the robbery happened, etc.. you are upset at the person that is reporting the robbery to you.

That is what the Democrats are doing with Elon Musk right now.
Old Sarge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is the paper those DemocRATs filed those suits with too slick to wipe your ass with?

/asking for a friend
"Green" is the new RED.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Okay.

I had hoped that I had witnessed peak, ultimate peak, of pettifoggery.

I was incorrect.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Disappointed Trump team wasn't ready for this. Dems used it last time and it was in the news that Elias was working Dem state AGs in December to plan the resistance.

Trump team needs a friendly AG in a red state in a friendly circuit to be ready to file suit against each Trump order. Then fed judge rules it's good, Dems stuck if appealed, and conflicting circuit rulings expedited to Supreme Court.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Disappointed Trump team wasn't ready for this.


What are you talking about? They've been VERY prepared. Honestly, seems like you are just looking for something to be critical about.

Quote:


Trump team needs a friendly AG in a red state in a friendly circuit to be ready to file suit against each Trump order


That's not how it works. Republican AGs aren't in the business of filing fake lawsuits.

But even if they did, that wouldn't stop any of these injunctions from being entered.

I'm Gipper
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats pie to pay for lawfare lawyers being eaten by Elon.

nom nom nom
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She's baaaaaaaacccckkk


I'm Gipper
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UAS Ag said:

sharpdressedman said:

Anti-Trump lawsuits are quewed up all the way to the horizon.

Lawfare continues to be the Dems' most effective weapon available for the preservation of their agenda, absent physically eliminating PDJT.
Use the deep pockets of the FedGov to make them piss their money in the toilet. The DOJ has more money than all those *******s combined.

And, with the spigot of free money being turned off, a lot of these people and organizations that are suing are going to start having a hard time finding the funding for litigation.

This also means they have less money to do damage in other ways because they're having to spend their limited budgets on witch hunts...

Soros will continue to fund them. They may have more difficulty laundering the money, but they are evily ingenious
I hate tu. It's in my blood.
Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jpb1999 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

A joke. Elon is doing nothing but looking at data. He's deciding nothing.

Mere obstruction. They hate their corruption being exposed.
Yep... so weird.

How does this not prove to the rest of the mostly undecided middle that the dems are crooks and do not want their gravy train fraud system of stealing tax payers money to stop?
They can't afford to. Follow the money and I bet 40-60% of dem donations are actually embezzled govt funds


Not to mention 80-90% of their net worth


They will die on this hill
The world needs mean tweets

My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA

Trump 2024
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

She's baaaaaaaacccckkk


That ***** is terrible.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
None of this is an accident. After the last four years Trump is aware of liberal warfare. He's toying with them while the whole corrupt judiciary all jumps in to the same sinking boat. This is all a setup and the libs are falling in line.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Since it's Chutkan, I've just assumed she would enter a TRO. Would be very surprised otherwise.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Musk was appointed by the president.

That's the beginning and the end of the story.

They need to shut the **** up.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

Musk was appointed by the president.

That's the beginning and the end of the story.

They need to shut the **** up.

Appointment has a very specific meaning when dealing with the executive. It's probably best not to use that phrase when discussing this matter since it implies that Musk would need congressional consent.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The states being shocked about weekend work is so telling!


I'm Gipper
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SwigAg11 said:

Since it's Chutkan, I've just assumed she would enter a TRO. Would be very surprised otherwise.
Chutkan may just put Trump in jail.

She's a black robed tyrant.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have arguments of standing even been brought up over this?
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.