Quote:

---

The answer is at the bottom of the infographic you posted. Total includes "inactive registrations" which federal law requires to keep for 2 cycles

---

Huh? Venn Diagram that. Not of voting age but still "inactive registration"?

What am I missing?

And many keep those much, much longer than two cycles.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

The answer is at the bottom of the infographic you posted. Total includes "inactive registrations" which federal law requires to keep for 2 cycles

---

Huh? Venn Diagram that. Not of voting age but still "inactive registration"?

What am I missing?

---

People that have passed away or moved in/out of state would probably be the 2 biggest causes. They would no longer be on the census, but still listed as inactive registration.

For a less nefarious "we need save act rah rah" explanation, this could also be issues with "pre-registration" which allows those under voting age to register prior to their 18th birthday.

In short, many issues between "total registration" and "active registration". A pre-registered or inactive individual would pop on this graphic, but wouldn't be able to vote if they showed up… and I'm not even getting started on the issues of "estimated population" which could be orders of magnitude off

boulderaggie said:

---

This may not be news, but it's news to me. How in the world could 12 states have more registered voters than they have voting age adults? This stinks and shows why we need the Save Act. Notice anything curious about the red state Senators?

Senators of the 12 states with more registered voters than voting-age citizens pic.twitter.com/ij8a944fMd

— Shiloh Marx (@Shilohmarx) May 15, 2026

---

<shocked face>

No surprise these are blue libtard states & states that have barely leaned red. If anyone tries to explain any technical nuances are likely Infected with TDS. It wouldn't surprise me if Collins & Murkowski are against the Save Act.

Iced-T14 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

The answer is at the bottom of the infographic you posted. Total includes "inactive registrations" which federal law requires to keep for 2 cycles

---

Huh? Venn Diagram that. Not of voting age but still "inactive registration"?

What am I missing?

---

People that have passed away or moved in/out of state would probably be the 2 biggest causes. They would no longer be on the census, but still listed as inactive registration.

For a less nefarious "we need save act rah rah" explanation, this could also be issues with "pre-registration" which allows those under voting age to register prior to their 18th birthday.

In short, many issues between "total registration" and "active registration". A pre-registered or inactive individual would pop on this graphic, but wouldn't be able to vote if they showed up… and I'm not even getting started on the issues of "estimated population" which could be orders of magnitude off

---

LOL. Not even close.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

The answer is at the bottom of the infographic you posted. Total includes "inactive registrations" which federal law requires to keep for 2 cycles

---

Huh? Venn Diagram that. Not of voting age but still "inactive registration"?

What am I missing?

---

Those inactives may have moved out of state though doubt migration has been so abundant to account for the discrepancy. More than likely, the voter rolls haven't been purged in a decade plus.

Burn-It said:

---

No surprise these are blue libtard states & states that have barely leaned red. If anyone tries to explain any technical nuances are likely Infected with TDS. It wouldn't surprise me if Collins & Murkowski are against the Save Act.

---

I believe I read Murk is so opposed to it she's threatened to go Independent if Thune brings it to the floor for a talking filibuster.

aggiehawg said:

---

BadMoonRisin said:

---

All ERIC states. Every single one, except for Thune.

That's why they dont back the SAVE ACT.

---

Well done!

Glad someone was reading my posts AND understanding the implications.

(FTR: I donated money to Thune just to get rid of Daschle. Used to think that was a win but now? Queasy.

---

I try my best, Ms. hawg. You were right on every single account.

I am at least paying attention.

Quote:

---

I try my best, Ms. hawg. You were right on every single account.

I am at least paying attention. I try my best, Ms. hawg. You were right on every single account.

I am at least paying attention.

---

My Mom once gave me a wooden plaque that said, "I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken."

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

I try my best, Ms. hawg. You were right on every single account.

I am at least paying attention. I try my best, Ms. hawg. You were right on every single account.

I am at least paying attention.

---

My Mom once gave me a wooden plaque that said, "I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken."

---

Its kind of funny, but not super funny, that the RINOs are going to learn that they are going to be BTFO by primary opponents.

Your mom was a real one though and you have educated me innumerably, in the best way. Thank you.

For the uninformed.

Quote:

---

Member states securely submit voter registration and motor vehicle department data to ERIC. ERIC is also certified to use official death data from the Social Security Administration and subscribes to change of address data from the United States Postal Service.
Utilizing these four data sources, ERIC provides its members with reports that identify inaccurate or out-of-date voter registration records, deceased voters, individuals who appear to be eligible to vote but who are not yet registered, and possible cases of illegal voting.
In compliance with federal and state laws, members use these reports to contact voters for the purposes of updating their record or to remove ineligible and deceased voters from the rolls. Members also contact likely eligible but not yet registered individuals, providing information on how best to register. Possible cases of illegal voting are reviewed and, if found credible, referred to law enforcement.

---

Website https://ericstates.org/

Which I have been screaming about for years now.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

I try my best, Ms. hawg. You were right on every single account.

I am at least paying attention. I try my best, Ms. hawg. You were right on every single account.

I am at least paying attention.

---

My Mom once gave me a wooden plaque that said, "I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken."

---

in a meeting where I was pointing out the mistakes of a certain dept, a manager said, "we all make mistakes".
My reply was, " Yep, I made two. I divorced them both."

It's the old saying.

"My grandfather voted Republican till the day he died. He's voted Democrat ever since."

Iced-T14 said:

---

The answer is at the bottom of the infographic you posted. Total includes "inactive registrations" which federal law requires to keep for 2 cycles

---

Again, more rage bait to keep people stirred up.

aggiehawg said:

---

BTKAG97 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

The answer is at the bottom of the infographic you posted. Total includes "inactive registrations" which federal law requires to keep for 2 cycles

---

Huh? Venn Diagram that. Not of voting age but still "inactive registration"?

What am I missing?

---

Those inactives may have moved out of state though doubt migration has been so abundant to account for the discrepancy. More than likely, the voter rolls haven't been purged in a decade plus.

---

PAY ATTENTION!!!!!!!!!!!! Do I need to slap your hand with a ruler like a nun in Catholic School??

These voter rolls have been "serviced" by an outside NGO acronymed ERIC since 2012. At their height, over 26 states paid THEM to maintain their voter rolls. Which they did not do. Instead, they created phantom voters to use for registrations and voting in elections since then. THAT is why the voter rolls in those states are f***ed up as a can of worms. And result in fraudulent vote counts

---

Please dont take my gold star.

Yeah, ERIC isnt something that sticks in my mind even given the numerous times you have mentioned it. I'll admit to being a terrible student.

Iced-T14 said:

---

People that have passed away or moved in/out of state would probably be the 2 biggest causes.

---

The biggest cause is democrats needing fake voters to rig elections. But you know that.

There are only three kinds of people in this world:

Those who can count and those who cannot.

FWIW if you look at the county-level list there are several in Texas.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Iced-T14 said:

---

People that have passed away or moved in/out of state would probably be the 2 biggest causes.

---

The biggest cause is democrats needing fake voters to rig elections. But you know that.

---

And the moon landing was fake

BadMoonRisin said:

---

All ERIC states. Every single one, except for Thune.

That's why they dont back the SAVE ACT. They, by design, do not want valid citizens to be involved in their elections.

---

I can not think of anything that this White House could do that would make me happier than the DOJ taking some kind of legal action against ERIC, whether it be civil for going to far in the grey areas related to some type of election laws, or criminal related to their funding of some sort.

I think I would have to take off work that day in celebration.

Not surprised you believe that.

Iced-T14 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Iced-T14 said:

---

People that have passed away or moved in/out of state would probably be the 2 biggest causes.

---

The biggest cause is democrats needing fake voters to rig elections. But you know that.

---

And the moon landing was fake

---

If something is working well, look for who has an incentive for that thing not working well, and that is the cause for that thing not working well.

Who else has an incentive to have inflated voter roles?

doubledog said:

---

In some states, Democrats can vote twice and continue voting after life.

---

They can and do vote much more than twice.

BusterAg said:

---

Iced-T14 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Iced-T14 said:

---

People that have passed away or moved in/out of state would probably be the 2 biggest causes.

---

The biggest cause is democrats needing fake voters to rig elections. But you know that.

---

And the moon landing was fake

---

If something is working well, look for who has an incentive for that thing not working well, and that is the cause for that thing not working well.

Who else has an incentive to have inflated voter roles?

---

If that's the basis for a conspiracy, then anything could be construed. Trumps numbers were falling, so he staged an assassination attempt. It worked well the first time, so he tried it again. OR if we want to keep looking specifically at voting, you can look at the Massie/Gallrein election and the unusually high numbers there.

Do I believe he staged the attempt or that the Massie election was rigged? No, but the same "logic" is there.

boulderaggie said:

---

This may not be news, but it's news to me. How in the world could 12 states have more registered voters than they have voting age adults? This stinks and shows why we need the Save Act. Notice anything curious about the red state Senators?

---

Because our voting system is F'd up and this is how the dems stay in power. They literally have votes to keep the dead on their voter roles.

Iced-T14 said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Iced-T14 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Iced-T14 said:

---

People that have passed away or moved in/out of state would probably be the 2 biggest causes.

---

The biggest cause is democrats needing fake voters to rig elections. But you know that.

---

And the moon landing was fake

---

If something is working well, look for who has an incentive for that thing not working well, and that is the cause for that thing not working well.

Who else has an incentive to have inflated voter roles?

---

If that's the basis for a conspiracy, then anything could be construed. Trumps numbers were falling, so he staged an assassination attempt. It worked well the first time, so he tried it again. OR if we want to keep looking specifically at voting, you can look at the Massie/Gallrein election and the unusually high numbers there.

Do I believe he staged the attempt or that the Massie election was rigged? No, but the same "logic" is there.

---

1) Do you believe that the voter registration system is working well?

2) Do you believe that there is another organization that has more incentive than the democrats for it working poorly?

3) Why does that organization have a stronger incentive than the democrats?

4) Do you believe that people respond to incentives?