West Texas
Sponsored by

Texas HS Football Rules in the Old Days

655 Views | 8 Replies | Last: 19 yr ago by OA5II
fossil_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You old timers are going to have to help me out on all the funny rules we had to endure in the 40s and 50s ... I remember some offhand but not all for sure. Believe me, the game was completely different in those days. Most of the rules were the outgrowth of numerous humorous activities that some coaches had worked into their game plans.

The best rules concerned formalizing substitutions and keeping close tabs of all players on the field. In the 40s UIL came out with a rule that when subs entered the game they would come onto the field with their right hand behind their back even with the belt and the left hand would would be held up like the Indian peace sign (HOW.) The sub had to report in to the ref and tell him the number of the fellow he was replacing. Substitutions were only allowed during time outs (unless a player was totally incapacitated.) And all 11 players had to be in the team huddle before each play.

There was a good reason for this. In the even older days some evil coaches were known to make substitutions in the middle of a play, i.e., as a play developed say a sweep near the home bench one player would step off the field and his sub would run onto the field 20 yards past the line of scrimmage and be ready to a pass. (That was a tough play to guard against!) And the rule for all teammembers in the huddle was aimed at the "hideout" play. In that one if a play ended in a pileup near the home sideline all would get up and return to the ball spot ... except one who would remain quietly as a helpful spectator on the sideline threw a blanket over him. Then, when the next play started the hideout would toss aside the blanket and sprint downfield for a pass.

And even then, to the best of my recollection only three players could sub in during one timeout. So you may quickly realize the substitution traffic was mighty light during a game. So players had to go both ways, offense and defense, many for the entire game. And while in the game a player had to be able to play 2 or 3 positions because officials would not call a timeout as long as all 11 were somewhat ambulatory ... so if you were a fullback and got knocked crazy you just switched places with a guard or tackle and play resumed.

It was in the 50s that colleges began squawking of substitution rule changes that would allow a strange concept known as 2-platoon football. That was an offensive team and a defensive team that could freely sub as the occasion presented itself. It did not affect smaller West Texas schools because few had enough quality players to field two specialized teams ... most only had maybe 20-25 on a squad. Platoon systems were slow to be adopted at the college level for the same reason ... when the Ags returned from Junction in 1954 Bear Bryant only had a 26-man squad so the best of those went both ways.

The most frequent penalty in those days was "Illegal use of the Hands." We had to keep our hands touching the body, whether offensive blocking or defensive rushing .... there was none of common-today pushing, shoving, slapping with arms extended. It was a good rule then because remember we did not have face guards and a fist or clawing hand or swinging elbow could do a number of bad things to a kids face. But even with the hands rule by mid-season we all looked like we had been beaten with an ugly stick.

Another reason for the rule on hands not swinging around was LIME. In those days all the lines on the field were marked with a four inch wide layer of lime ... some called it Quick Lime but I do not know for sure. All I know is when some got in your eyes it would turn you into a gymnastic performer. It was bad enough if it got inside the collar of your jersey and encountered sweat. There were always rumors that whoever the next opponent was were notorious for sneaking a handful of lime to toss into the face of an opposing lineman ... I never saw it or experienced it but I am sure it happened (everything else did.)

Another condition we had to endure was fan control. Few of the smaller schools had bleachers (unless they were fortunate to have a few constructed by the WPA during the 30s.) So during games the crowds stood along the sidelines or sat on the front fenders of cars parked as closely to the field as possible. There was always heckling and taunts along the opposing sideline so players were concerned for their welfare when a play piled up near the sideline. And with fans jammed together during a big game fights were not an uncommon distraction.

But the end of the game signaled a tradition that made it all worthwhile. In those days when the final gun sounded all of the Pep Squad members, Cheerleaders and Twirlers ran onto the field to hug and congratulate their players ... even if the final score was 72-0 in favor of the bad guys. I haven't seen anything like that in years and years. We would straggle into the Doghouse with its stinking one room and a cold water shower stall. What an experience.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I remember reading about one old-time college whose players came out for a game with emblems sown on the belly of their jerseys that just happened to be the same size, shape and color as a football. Made it a little hard to detect just who was carrying the real thing.


On a related but different subject, there were some weird rules for women's basketball, back in the day. I know the girls played 6-man half-court BB into the 70s. But mom told me that when she played back in the 40s, there was an additional rule about dribbling. They could only bounce the ball once while running, then they had to stop and pass. I guess they didn't want the girls exerting themselves.

That's really funny when you consider that the West Texas farm and ranch girls were probably about 3X tougher than today's girls.

Also amazing to me is that girls BB was commonplace in the "backwards" rural towns of West Texas and the Panhandle of the 1930s, and that little Wayland Baptist was the powerhouse of the time, through the 70s. Yet the big cities and "progressive" universities couldn't be bothered with girls BB until Title IX forced them into it in the late 70s.
fossil_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Until the mid-80s girls basketball in Texas was basically 6 on 6 playing half court ... when the game was changed to "men's rules." (At first high schools were given the option by UIL to remain 6-on-6 or to change ... but by 1994 all had changed to full court.)

The UIL did the girls involved no favor by the change ... and certainly not the spectators ... because the old 6-on-6 with its quirky rules was a fast paced, physically demanding, and high scoring contest. And a game that had a place on the team for any girl ... regardless of size, shape, speed, shooting accuracy and other attributes recruited for today.

In 6-on-6 the court was divided at mid-court ... 3 forwards on one end and 3 guards on the other. Their counterparts were the opposite specialty. The guards and forwards could not cross the line. After a score the ball was returned to midcourt for a jump ball to resume play.

The aim of the game was a fast pace by encouraging passing instead of dribbling up and down the court. The guard's game was to get the ball to their forwards as quickly as possible. Forwards were the gunners. Girls were not allowed to touch each other ... (except that tie-ups for a loose ball were commonly ferocious.) Shot blocking was not allowed ... but a BIG girl guard could camp under the basket for as long as she deemed necessary to collect rebounds.

A small, quick ball-hawk guard could star at the expense of taller or larger forwards. Girls who lacked other physical attributes could make up for that by having great shooting skill. There was a place for every girl that came out for the team.

There was no shot-clock because there was no need for one. With only six people competing for the ball in half court, shots came quickly and rebounding was the key to both offense and defense.

Conversely, with men's rules during the days before shot-clock, slow-down was a popular tactic among lesser talented teams by incessant dribbling and passing ... like keepaway. Some boring men's games in those days ended up with a score of say 6 to 4 ... That never happened in a girl's game!

Unfortunately there were few places for a girl basketball star to continue her sport after high school. Some colleges has girls teams but did not award scholarships. Little Wayland College at Plainview attracted the best girl basketball players in the state because it competed in the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) on the national (and international) stage instead of down the road apiece in a school bus. (Ahhh, the Wayland Baptist Flying Queens ... the first girls team in the US to travel to all games by air courtesy of a Plainview flying service owner.)

I like to watch the Ag women play basketball today but, honest folks, that same group playing the old 6-on-6 rules would be a much more exciting game. Imagine the pace of a game with both teams continuously playing fast break.

WestTxAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Obviously I'm a bit too young to be able to contribute any firsthand stories to this thread, but I've always enjoyed reading and hearing about how high school football in the old days was such a wide-open free-for-all sort of event with no ethical constraints whatsoever.

There have been concerns in my lifetime about high school football becoming more important than the academics, coaches seeking to win at all costs, etc., but from what I can tell, those are time-honored traditions dating back to the early days of high school football, and the old days were much worse than it is now.

I've heard many stories of the early (1920s and 30s) football powerhouses like Waco, Breckenridge, and others having teams composed of semipro players, Indians from reservations in Oklahoma, and other ringers who were far too old to be playing high school football. Then there was the classic tactic (recounted in fine fashion in James Michener's epic novel "Texas" ) of finding the best young football players around the state, and then traveling to offer them and their families the sort of "incentives" necessary to get them to move to town (i.e. a new house, a well-paying job in the oil field for dad, etc.)

Good times...

[This message has been edited by WestTxAg06 (edited 1/10/2007 3:13p).]
mellison
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My dad told me a story from his days playing in Sierra Blanca.

Sierra Blanca @ Balmoreah:
Sierra Blanca had 7 players but Balmoreah only had 5. SB loaned on player to Balmoreah so they could play 6 on 6. Ironically Balmoreah ended up beating Sierra Blanca.

Sierra Blanca wasn't in a district back then. They would play 6-man, 8-man, and 11-man games in the same season. It would just depend on how many people they could get together.
fossil_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You folks have grown up with the "illegal motion" penalties so you assume offenses have always been bedeviled with that rule. Not so.

You have heard quarterbacks call "Down, Set, Hut 2, Hut2 ..." leading up to "Hiking" the ball.(I love that old term of the center Hiking the ball.) There is an old time significance in that qb call.

From the stone age through the 40s and 50s when the quarterback said "Set" the linemen went to an elbows on knees posture and backs went to hands on knees pose ... but from the Set position backs and linemen could shift positions in any number and about any location. (Remember the old Knute Rockne Notre Dame Shift.) But when the qb said "Set," linemen went to the 3-point stance and no more shifting was allowed (I do not recall any hard, fast rules then about moving body parts ... even a jerky motion to draw the opposing lineman offside.)

Also, there was no rule that a play could not start from the Down position if the center Hiked the ball.

One devious play I heard about during that period was the team lined up, the qb said "Down" and the team went into the Down posture, then a couple of linemen stood up and asked the qb about the play, then others walked back to the qb and started the discussion, then the center nonchalantly picked up the ball and joined in the round table discussion. Meanwhile the opposing team was idly and curiously watching this goings on. Then the center stuffed the ball in the qb's hands and all assembled stampeded around end. That was a great play until someone complained and the Illegal Motion rule came out.
fossil_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dp

[This message has been edited by fossil_ag (edited 1/10/2007 8:09p).]
powerbiscuit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sorry to deviate from football, but this kind of fits in with "making do" that was mentioned earlier

we once played a basketball game where the other team only had 5 players...sometime in the 3rd or early 4th quarter, one of their players fouled out, so they only had 4 remaining players.

Our coach then made one of our players stand at half court and stay out of the action...we finished the game playing 4 on 4.
FishrCoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My dads maternal grandparents & family lived in Stephens Co, near Breckenridge. He used to tell stories about a player or two that had to be retrieved from the jail before Friday games. Also, in Rotan in the mid 40's, the basketball court was outdoors, said the wind could wreak havoc on shots!
OA5II
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I graduated HS in 1994, so I am not that old. When I was in the 5th grade, we moved to McCloud, OK and the girls played 6 on 6 basketball. Strangest thing I had ever seen.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.