Anybody else who track their calories using sites like Myfitnesspal feel like they vastly overestimate the calories from a steak as consumed?
I trim every ounce of fat off of any steak I eat (huge part of the discrepancy, I get that), but even when I use "fully trimmed" listing, my body never "feels" the calories from steak that I tracked at the end of the day. I'm usually eating choice sirloins cooked over a fire pit with no added calories when I eat "steak" fwiw.
It's normally not a problem when I'm just "eating healthy", where it's pretty easy to lose a lb/week just on "clean"ish foods and not track. The problem lies when I try to take a calorie deficit to an aggressive number, which for me is like 1800-2000 calories. I'm hungry AF when I eat steak for too much of protein and go by my tracked #'s.
I know "real world" I can just eat more and throw a pair of middle fingers to the calorie counts, just wondering if anyone else notices this about steak or other foods when they track.
I trim every ounce of fat off of any steak I eat (huge part of the discrepancy, I get that), but even when I use "fully trimmed" listing, my body never "feels" the calories from steak that I tracked at the end of the day. I'm usually eating choice sirloins cooked over a fire pit with no added calories when I eat "steak" fwiw.
It's normally not a problem when I'm just "eating healthy", where it's pretty easy to lose a lb/week just on "clean"ish foods and not track. The problem lies when I try to take a calorie deficit to an aggressive number, which for me is like 1800-2000 calories. I'm hungry AF when I eat steak for too much of protein and go by my tracked #'s.
I know "real world" I can just eat more and throw a pair of middle fingers to the calorie counts, just wondering if anyone else notices this about steak or other foods when they track.