Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Will Stein to Kentucky

4,026 Views | 17 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by Heineken-Ashi
Guy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Talk about a quick turnaround.

Wisconsin_Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is he going to coach in the playoffs or is he bailing on his team also?
1626
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Committee needs to bump Oregon down a couple of spots now!
barstoolexpert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ags should be #5 tomorrow because of the coaching changes. If they fall to #7 or below, the committee is most unfair people in sports
barstoolexpert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They really should be #4 with TTU in a spot to pass them if they win handily in CCG
a.froman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wisconsin_Ag said:

Is he going to coach in the playoffs or is he bailing on his team also?

How do you suggest these coaches and schools handle a change with the new signing day for high school
Players this week , transfer portal opening in early January and the playoffs going til mid January?
Come Out Roll
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
barstoolexpert said:

Ags should be #5 tomorrow because of the coaching changes. If they fall to #7 or below, the committee is most unfair people in sports

Unfair????
Are you f'n kidding???

All we had to do was win….:and all this nonsensical BS wouldn't exist….
barstoolexpert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Come Out Roll said:

barstoolexpert said:

Ags should be #5 tomorrow because of the coaching changes. If they fall to #7 or below, the committee is most unfair people in sports

Unfair????
Are you f'n kidding???


All we had to do was win….:and all this nonsensical BS wouldn't exist….

Yes, unfair. Recency bias and flipping the narrative to what suits them vs who has the better resume. We have the better resume BEFORE coaching changes which is a metric they specifically call out in the bylaws of the committee.

IF we had won.. we'd be 3 with a chance to be #2.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Come Out Roll said:

barstoolexpert said:

Ags should be #5 tomorrow because of the coaching changes. If they fall to #7 or below, the committee is most unfair people in sports

Unfair????
Are you f'n kidding???

All we had to do was win….:and all this nonsensical BS wouldn't exist….
Oregon played all cupcakes pre-conference and has SOS of like #50. lol
12thMan9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe we should be downgraded because nobody wants our coaches.
Ronnie '88
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Come Out Roll said:

barstoolexpert said:

Ags should be #5 tomorrow because of the coaching changes. If they fall to #7 or below, the committee is most unfair people in sports

Unfair????
Are you f'n kidding???

All we had to do was win….:and all this nonsensical BS wouldn't exist….
TxAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
barstoolexpert said:

They really should be #4 with TTU in a spot to pass them if they win handily in CCG


No F'n way they'd set it up for the B1G to get 3 of the 4 byes in 1st round
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My god the whining on this board about the "unfairness" of the rankings based on poster's personal opinions and eyetests is just laughable. Do you not think that every other fanbase has the same about their ranking and can likely provide just as much evidence to back up their argument?

The above poster is 100% correct. Just go out and win the game instead of sh***ing the bed and we wouldn't sound like a bunch of babies whining about "fairness".
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FL_Ag1998 said:

My god the whining on this board about the "unfairness" of the rankings based on poster's personal opinions and eyetests is just laughable. Every other fanbase will argue the exact same points about their ranking from their perspective.

The above poster is 100% correct. Just go out and win the game instead of sh***ing the bed and we wouldn't sound like a bunch of babies whining about "fairness".
If one eye test is unassailable, then of course so is any time there is one. Committee is playing with fire and will get burned.
Timberwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wisconsin_Ag said:

Is he going to coach in the playoffs or is he bailing on his team also?


I'd guess he will stick around for the playoffs. Kentucky can afford wait and he can get more publicity during a playoff run rather than disappearing into the Kentucky landscape
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Think that's a good hire by UK, but time will tell if he can recruit.

We lost and it's a major eff up by coaches and team...looked ill prepared, not ready for the moment and probably think we are better than we are....we will pay the consequences.

We've also looked like a crap team for 1/2 vs USCe and mediocre in some other games. The committee has been putting us at 3 all along with supposedly a better SOS and SOR due to the 'eye test' and therefore we just poked both eyes out with an absolute crap performance offensively, defensively and ST (all 3 phases were awful).
______________________________________________________ Play for the name on the front of your jersey, not the back...
TexasAggie81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great hire for Kentucky.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Come Out Roll said:

barstoolexpert said:

Ags should be #5 tomorrow because of the coaching changes. If they fall to #7 or below, the committee is most unfair people in sports

Unfair????
Are you f'n kidding???

All we had to do was win….:and all this nonsensical BS wouldn't exist….

Why were Oregon and Tech allowed to lose a game then?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.