Based on 2YR average conference opponents Win %

Easiest
UGA 42.36
Vandy 43.75
Bama 45.14
S Car 47.22
tu 47.92
Tenn 47.92
LSU 47.92
Ole Miss 48.61
Mizzou 49.31
A&M 50.00
OU 52.08
Florida 52.78
Kentucky 55.56
Miss St 55.56
Ark 57.64
Auburn 59.03
Hardest

Ultimately meaningless given portal/nil

(edited to remove first colum that was simply an index, not intended as a ranking)

I'm afraid your post is ultimately meaningless. I don't understand it at all.

Sounds like a you problem.

NoAgTag said:

---

Sounds like a you problem.

---

Ew. lol

Funny, when I saw UVA's schedule for next season I thought it looked a little easier than most of the others I saw

Looks like I was right

So our schedule is right in the middle... seems about right, but the last couple of games will be tough

All these things like this are always biased to make it look like the good teams have easy schedules while the bad teams have hard ones because the good teams don't play themselves.

Also, just simple logic dictates that, the better you are, the easier your schedule will be, and the worse you are, the harder your schedule will be because you look hard vs easy by how likely you think your team will win each game.

And Georgia can't play Georgia and Bama can't play Bama to make the schedule harder. When you are a top team you take out yourself as a tough opponent option

The scheduling format seems to be a bit of an experiment. I made the spreadsheet to track how it evolves after the first 4 year cycle. (Not shown are columns that include permanent opp, home, away and neutral site opp win %)

With the turnover in rosters, even a one year assessment has a wide range of uncertainty