Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Big 12 Refs

2,230 Views | 25 Replies | Last: 3 mo ago by CynicalAg98
VatoLocoAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big 12 refs are not good. Blew the ball incomplete dead. Then gifts it to Miami. Not surprised. Expect more of this.
Gig Em and God Bless America!
National Champions in Football 1939.

SEC Proud!
RyanPearson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would have been overturned anyway. They saved like 3 minutes of review.
3rd Coast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was a fumble...hth
texag101
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dude, don't blame the refs. It's been clean so far.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VatoLocoAggie said:

Big 12 refs are not good. Blew the ball incomplete dead. Then gifts it to Miami. Not surprised. Expect more of this.
Big 12 refs got better when Texas left their conference…hth???
swc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was a fumble but if refs blew whistle and killed the play, which they seem to only do when it hurts us, then tough titty, play is over no Miami recovery.
bigjag19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nope. Still would have been Miami on review.
AceAggie05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Immediate recovery by the defense. By rule it goes to them.
merch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Refs have been great
neAGle96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My only issue was the punt return by conception. He was nailed right as he caught it. That is a personal foul. Punt returner needs 3 yard zone to catch ball
agwrestler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Free TO for Miami with the sideline catch review.
DWren
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's been a very well called game.

I know the refs is a card so many of our fans love to play as well as the conspiracy card….. but you're gonna have play a new card today.
Ginormus Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
neAGle96 said:

My only issue was the punt return by conception. He was nailed right as he caught it. That is a personal foul. Punt returner needs 3 yard zone to catch ball


That is no longer the rule. No halo.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas 8&4 said:

It was a fumble...hth


No it wasn't. His arm was moving forward with control of the ball. The hit didn't cause the ball to go 5 yards forward.

Should have been reviewed and any whistle, IF blown, would have been irrelevant.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ginormus Ag said:

neAGle96 said:

My only issue was the punt return by conception. He was nailed right as he caught it. That is a personal foul. Punt returner needs 3 yard zone to catch ball


That is no longer the rule. No halo.


There's no "Halo" but he must be giving a 1-yard unimpeded opportunity to catch it. Further, when in question, it IS a foul. This is Kick Catch Interference, and not a Personal Foul.
merch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Outside of maybe catch kick interference we have not noticed refs. That is fantastic.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91AggieLawyer said:

Texas 8&4 said:

It was a fumble...hth


No it wasn't. His arm was moving forward with control of the ball. The hit didn't cause the ball to go 5 yards forward.

Should have been reviewed and any whistle, IF blown, would have been irrelevant.



Yeah. It wasn't though.
DGrimesAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VatoLocoAggie said:

Big 12 refs are not good. Blew the ball incomplete dead. Then gifts it to Miami. Not surprised. Expect more of this.


They're confused and haven't realized there's an "A&M" behind those TEXAS letters.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Ginormus Ag said:

neAGle96 said:

My only issue was the punt return by conception. He was nailed right as he caught it. That is a personal foul. Punt returner needs 3 yard zone to catch ball


That is no longer the rule. No halo.


There's no "Halo" but he must be giving a 1-yard unimpeded opportunity to catch it. Further, when in question, it IS a foul. This is Kick Catch Interference, and not a Personal Foul.

Good luck finding that in the rule book. He had an unimpressed chance to catch it and didn't call for a fair catch. He was a defenseless player so you could have targeting but there was no contact that was close to that.
DWren
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Texas 8&4 said:

It was a fumble...hth


No it wasn't. His arm was moving forward with control of the ball. The hit didn't cause the ball to go 5 yards forward.

Should have been reviewed and any whistle, IF blown, would have been irrelevant.


Every play is reviewed.
It was a fumble.
He lost possession before his arm started moving forward
Angry Jonathan Zaludek
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has Eugene Semko ever once reviewed a call that went A&M's way? A diehard t-sip manning college football's premier conference's review booth is never a good thing.
Angry Jonathan Zaludek
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No late hit call cost us this series.
swc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who can defend that crap?

Punches to the back of Moss's head and then late hit the next play
gambochaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cfp needs miami to win to justify leaving nd out

We getting effed without lube
agspirit_09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
****in bull *****
CynicalAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What they did to Moss was dirty. Followed by the slam out of bounds next play. Time for A&M to man up if the refs gonna let this stuff go.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.