Could've changed the outcome of the game. Lots of reasons we lost this game but these no-calls hurt bad.

We should just let the league office know for next season that we will be the worst offenders of late hits and targeting in hope of injuring players now.

Bc that's what they want. If they say a player has to sit out for a game. Just say no. Play him anyways.

It's WWE anyways now. That's what they want.

What are they gonna do. Say we can't play the game. Hah.

Is there a replay?

Haha nothing will ever top that Auburn horse collar for sure.

But today's non calls probably changed the victor of the game. Still our own damn fault for not finding 11 points.

Well when the replay official is a sip grad it's not that strange…

Reed was gifted 15 yards bc of his acting skills

Bag said:

---

Is there a replay?

---

No. But there are a couple to see if we made a first down. Is that what you are looking for?

Be warned. It takes 5 minutes watch each video. And still not clear at end of day though.

Could have changed the game...unfortunately it was Miami's Dline that changed the game

If you target just lay on the ground injured, no one will flag a injured player

Loren Visser said:

---

Reed was gifted 15 yards bc of his acting skills

---

He still got hit late in the head.

Any contact is a flag iirc?

So im assuming by rule that is NOT targeting. With all the time and replay if it was clearly a penalty and should have been called the non call just cannot happen in a playoff game. Reply officals saw it several times.

If by rule it was targeting then you have major explanation needed...not that it does any good but it isnt like that should not happen, it cant happen with replay

Also, missed PI that was extremely obvious

merch said:

---

So im assuming by rule that is NOT targeting. With all the time and replay if it was clearly a penalty and should have been called the non call just cannot happen in a playoff game. Reply officals saw it several times.

If by rule it was targeting then you have major explanation needed...not that it does any good but it isnt like that should not happen, it cant happen with replay

---

It should be discussed this week. The league has just said it's open season by not even acknowledging or discussing the call.


Every coach should devote 30 minutes to practice to learn how to tackle like this. Bc apparently that's was a great form tackle.

We were really hosed by those two calls. Denied us a first down on a semi promising drive and a first down at the one with enough time for two runs. Also that KC Concepcion punt where he was lit up as he caught it was bs. Refs did us no favors at all.

merch said:

---

So im assuming by rule that is NOT targeting. With all the time and replay if it was clearly a penalty and should have been called the non call just cannot happen in a playoff game. Reply officals saw it several times.

If by rule it was targeting then you have major explanation needed...not that it does any good but it isnt like that should not happen, it cant happen with replay

---

Big 12 officials... you think they give two ****s about getting the call right?

Big 12 refs.
tu fans even when refereeing.
Tiger don't change its stripes even when wearing a shirt.

Big 12 refs tried to rip us off and they did.

Bub, we scored 3 points against a team SMU beat. Needing a personal foul to bail us out is a lame requirement that true champions don't need. We're a pretty good team that's it.

Deserved to lose today with how O played.

And that don't have **** to do with the ****ed up no call on late hit and targeting. It can be both for some of you dip ****s.