Let's face it: the guy is, across the boards, about the most pejorative troll in Texags history. Literally derails every thread he posts on.

So let's just ignore him. Let him post whatever he wants and do not answer it.

Staff would you sticky this?

In

Are you under the impression that the Texags staff could give a stiff fart about what goes on in this forum?

I like having Simplebay around. Every group needs a mascot.

Count me in.

I've already been ignoring his comments

ahh a list of spurs crybabies in one place. SWEET

this is the stupidest thing i've read on texags BB other...

quote:

---

Staff would you sticky this?

---

if you can't deal with my opinions, i suggest you leave. because im not. and spurs threads "derail" because people like guitarsoup and puddy start personally insulting me. when i never even mention the lakers. they just cry boo boo all the way home when i offer a disagreeing opinion.

I EVEN COMPLIMENTED THE SPURS IN THE SPURS:WOW thread.

I thought Rockets fans were supposed to be the whiny ones. Get the hell over it. Its a message board.

for the first time in my life, I agree with MazAg

The real issue ironically isn't Simplebay. The issue is the reactions to Simplebay. He is a Lakers fan who knows little about the Spurs but feels the need to post about them constantly. Then when he posts incorrectly people argue with him as though he will admit his mistake. It just goes on and on. I do think the problem would be solved by just not giving him attention which is clearly all he wants. He's kind of like the Tech guy that insists on sitting in the Aggie section and isn't outwardly rude but has to sing every Tech song and stand up and cheer loudly when his team wins. Just annoying but not annoying enough to get kicked out of the stadium.

People say the same thing about every antagonizer -- Larry David, colin, whoever. It always boils down to the fact that the problem is always the poster in the beginning -- always.

again. it's my opinions. i do know what im talking about. to recap on my opinions about the spurs are so INCORRECT:

-manu and tim will probably be plagued with injury. i hope not, but the last 2 years have definitely pointed to so. they looked slow and pretty aging last year.

-blair was a steal at that pick. he's not going to be the ROY. he will be millsap at best in a couple years. he's undersized and will struggle in the west guarding bigger opponents (much as millsap has on defense)

-mcdyess is the spurs best pickup, and could be the most effective by spreading the paint with his midrange jumpshot allowing parker to penetrate. however, i think the spurs are going to be too heavily dependent on parker, and they cannot rely on the 3pointer (pretty much bonner's entire role). Manu even looked to get a little 3pointer happy.

-richard jefferson is a good middle of the road player. a good pickup, and the kind of player the spurs needed at the SF position. but he's still too much of a jump shooter (or at least he was last year).

-the spurs are a good team this year, and should get about 55 wins, even with injuries. if they all stay healthy all year it could be 60 wins.


-all in all, i think the spurs are are the 2nd best team in the west. and this is the best team on paper the spurs have had in a while. and i think duncan's window is done after this year. and sadly, they will not get to the finals this year.

[This message has been edited by Simplebay (edited 10/29/2009 2:28p).]

The d-bag never quits....

His opinions = nothing but backhanded comments

Same old **** on BO.

For the record GS is almost as bad as Simpletonbay. DC at a distant third.

BO in a nutshell:
1. Normal basketball conversation.
2. Simple chimes in with maybe a sentence on the topic at hand, then plugs the Lakers and makes a weak attempt at smack, usually including one of 3 Texas teams.
3. GS returns salvo on cue, writing a small novella to carefully dissect every inch of Simple's post and defend the Spurs.
4. Simple retorts in the same manner.
5. Repeat ad naseum, splashed with DCs occasional interjections. Occasionally another poster sneaks in a comment.

Judge nails it

What up Hotard?