oh jesus

quote:

---

CSNNE.com has learned that the former Boston Celtic forward plans to sign with the Los Angeles Lakers.

Wallace hasn't played in an NBA game since Game 7 of the 2010 NBA Finals, alerting the C's shortly before the game that he planned to retire.

---

http://www.necn.com/02/24/12/Source-Rasheed-Wallace-to-sign-with-Lake/landing_sports.html?blockID=657492&feedID=3352

he already basically handed the lakers one title a couple of years ago in game 7 when he stood and watched gasol and bynum grab board after board while his old washed up ass was wheezing out by the 3pt line

Sadly he still might be better than troy murphy or josh mcroberts

I real wish they'd quit signing players I hate...

quote:

---

If the Lakers indeed are interested in signing Rasheed Wallace — a logical step-down from flirting with Gilbert Arenas—it lends credence to the Rajon Rondo/Jermaine O’Neal-Pau Gasol swap I keep hearing. Lord knows they’re desperate for a point guard and Rondo is exceedingly obtainable and Kobe Bryant loves his “any means possible” style. New York Post

---

I would take a Gasol for Rondo/Bass

Thats what i hear the lakers are interested in.

Either that, and or Beasley/Felton

Lakers are that desperate huh

I think its hilarious. Gasol gets the lakers to the finals three times out of the last four seasons. 'Meh. We got what we needed out of him. Next.'. No sense of loyalty. While the celts will increase their age average. I think the deal hurts both teams. The felton beasly trade on the other hand would be a homerun for lakers. Assuming bynum doesn't go down.

how these fing guys are broke is baffling

Pippen, Wallace, AI,- wtf

looks like Sheed's camp leaked the rumors.

In the words of Patrick Ewing "We make a lot of money, but we spend a lot of money."

NBA Players Union -We stimulate the economy

The Lakers passed on a deal that would have brought Beasley in for a first round pick. Guess they don't want him as bad as previously reported.

that's because im not sure they could use the Trade Exception in that scenario. and the lakers are already in luxury tax.

which means beasley wouldve cost 12.4MM


i think Beasley is Lakers plan C. doesn't mean it won't happen.

[This message has been edited by Simplebay (edited 2/29/2012 6:50p).]