HollywoodBQ said:
That explains it.
Ring #1 was a 10K that I paid $251 for in 1991.
Ring #2 is 14K that I paid $537 for in 2003.
Since I sacrificed 12 years of wear, I figured I'd get the 14K. 20 years into it, my ring looks like a 10K with 30+ years of wear.
Might have to get Ring #3 at some point for formal occasions where I want people to be able to read what it says.
I coulda gotten one for $251 but figured it would be better to wait until the price of gold shot up to about $1K per ounce.
I'm available to assist with financial planning iffin anyone is interested.
I bleed Maroon and I wipe burnt orange!