We need a 500 bps rate hike NOW

7,344 Views | 68 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 500,000ags
Red Pear Realty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Not 75 bps, not 100. We need 500. The Fed will admit to 9.1%, but we all know it's much higher. They have no control over inflation. There will be no soft landing.

Our options are to get ahead of this thing now and have a terrible correction, or continue raising rates a few basis points and chase inflation for a few years and have a potentially country-ending type of event happen at some point down the road.

I personally stand to make a lot more money with low interest rates, but this is the right thing to do for our country and our future, and it needs to be done sooner rather than later. The longer we wait, the worse it will be. To use Dr. Mark Dotzour's analogy, our country has had its face in the pile of cocaine for way too long. Time to go to rehab.
Sponsor Message: We Split Commissions. Full Service Agents in Austin, Bryan-College Station, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio. Red Pear Realty
gig em 02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That would ensure the rise of socialism and the complete destruction of the United States. A more reasonable solution would be to stop voting for democrats whose sole desire is to make the population dependent on government for survival.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Red Pear Realty said:

Not 75 bps, not 100. We need 500. The Fed will admit to 9.1%, but we all know it's much higher. They have no control over inflation. There will be no soft landing.

Our options are to get ahead of this thing now and have a terrible correction, or continue raising rates a few basis points and chase inflation for a few years and have a potentially country-ending type of event happen at some point down the road.

I personally stand to make a lot more money with low interest rates, but this is the right thing to do for our country and our future, and it needs to be done sooner rather than later. The longer we wait, the worse it will be. To use Dr. Mark Dotzour's analogy, our country has had its face in the pile of cocaine for way too long. Time to go to rehab.

"has had its face in the pile of cocaine for way too long. Time to go to rehab"

is that you Hunter Biden?

Red Pear Luke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Red Pear Realty said:

Not 75 bps, not 100. We need 500. The Fed will admit to 9.1%, but we all know it's much higher. They have no control over inflation. There will be no soft landing.

Our options are to get ahead of this thing now and have a terrible correction, or continue raising rates a few basis points and chase inflation for a few years and have a potentially country-ending type of event happen at some point down the road.

I personally stand to make a lot more money with low interest rates, but this is the right thing to do for our country and our future, and it needs to be done sooner rather than later. The longer we wait, the worse it will be. To use Dr. Mark Dotzour's analogy, our country has had its face in the pile of cocaine for way too long. Time to go to rehab.






YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not sure we have enough people around in a position to do anything that understand inflation (or economics for that matter) and how to combat it.

As of July 12, Goldman Sachs is saying inflation will moderate and ease by YE on its own. Also the same people that admitted they were surprised by inflation in the first place because they don't know what causes it.

Also the same people that have now redefined the definition of recession and that two quarters of negative GDP growth doesn't mean recession.

When a group like GS no longer understands inflation, then I'm not sure if anyone in government will.
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

I'm not sure we have enough people around in a position to do anything that understand inflation (or economics for that matter) and how to combat it.

As of July 12, Goldman Sachs is saying inflation will moderate and ease by YE on its own. Also the same people that admitted they were surprised by inflation in the first place because they don't know what causes it.

Also the same people that have now redefined the definition of recession and that two quarters of negative GDP growth doesn't mean recession.

When a group like GS no longer understands inflation, then I'm not sure if anyone in government will.
It's not that they don't understand it, they get rich off of it.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sims said:

YouBet said:

I'm not sure we have enough people around in a position to do anything that understand inflation (or economics for that matter) and how to combat it.

As of July 12, Goldman Sachs is saying inflation will moderate and ease by YE on its own. Also the same people that admitted they were surprised by inflation in the first place because they don't know what causes it.

Also the same people that have now redefined the definition of recession and that two quarters of negative GDP growth doesn't mean recession.

When a group like GS no longer understands inflation, then I'm not sure if anyone in government will.
It's not that they don't understand it, they get rich off of it.
Why not both?
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hah, that's fair. Broken clocks and blind squirrels I guess
mwp02ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree 100% but what are the secondary consequences of that with 130% debt:GDP domestically as well as so much worldwide debt that must be paid with dollars? I assume that would push the dollar to new all time highs and crush world economies leading to a new Plaza Accord?

They let the genie out the bottle and have no good moves left....
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wholesale prices shoot up near-record 11.3% in June on surge in energy costs
PUBLISHED THU, JUL 14 20228:51 AM EDTUPDATED 12 MIN AGO

  • The producer price index rose 11.3% from a year ago in June, near the record 11.6% posted in March.
  • Excluding food, energy and trade, core PPI was up 6.4%. The monthly gain of 0.3% was below expectations.
  • Jobless claims jumped to 244,000 last week, the highest level since November 2021.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sims said:

Hah, that's fair. Broken clocks and blind squirrels I guess
I go back to an insightful interview I heard on CNBC several months ago. I do not recall the guy's name but he was making the point that few people in the financial industry understand inflation anymore because most of the people in these firms doing all the backend analysis and work are too young to have ever experienced it. They've never lived through it and have no idea what it looks like IRL.

And for whatever reason, the definition of inflation has been ignored by these firms or papered over (ha). I guess they just thought it was pure theory that couldn't happen?

I listened to Goldman in real time from 2020 up until now repeatedly scoff at it and find reasons as to why it wouldn't be a big deal and not once ever mention all the printing of money causing it. And then they launch 2022 guidance with the comment that inflation in 2021 was the biggest surprise of the year.

You have to be f'ing kidding me with that statement! I've been needling my advisor this whole time laughing at the idiocy of his parent firm and he just has to take it with failed smile.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sims said:

YouBet said:

I'm not sure we have enough people around in a position to do anything that understand inflation (or economics for that matter) and how to combat it.

As of July 12, Goldman Sachs is saying inflation will moderate and ease by YE on its own. Also the same people that admitted they were surprised by inflation in the first place because they don't know what causes it.

Also the same people that have now redefined the definition of recession and that two quarters of negative GDP growth doesn't mean recession.

When a group like GS no longer understands inflation, then I'm not sure if anyone in government will.
It's not that they don't understand it, they get rich off of it.

BINGO!!

LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Sims said:

Hah, that's fair. Broken clocks and blind squirrels I guess
I go back to an insightful interview I heard on CNBC several months ago. I do not recall the guy's name but he was making the point that few people in the financial industry understand inflation anymore because most of the people in these firms doing all the backend analysis and work are too young to have ever experienced it. They've never lived through it and have no idea what it looks like IRL.

And for whatever reason, the definition of inflation has been ignored by these firms or papered over (ha). I guess they just thought it was pure theory that couldn't happen?

I listened to Goldman in real time from 2020 up until now repeatedly scoff at it and find reasons as to why it wouldn't be a big deal and not once ever mention all the printing of money causing it. And then they launch 2022 guidance with the comment that inflation in 2021 was the biggest surprise of the year.

You have to be f'ing kidding me with that statement! I've been needling my advisor this whole time laughing at the idiocy of his parent firm and he just has to take it with failed smile.

maybe because we have literal idiots in command of our government right now who believe in "the new economics of modern monetary theory"

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) is a heterodox macroeconomic framework that says monetarily sovereign countries like the U.S., U.K., Japan, and Canada, which spend, tax, and borrow in a fiat currency that they fully control, are not operationally constrained by revenues when it comes to federal government spending.

Put simply, such governments do not rely on taxes or borrowing for spending since they can print as much as they need and are the monopoly issuers of the currency. Since their budgets aren't like a regular household's, their policies should not be shaped by fears of a rising national debt.

Several other differences also exist between mainstream monetary theory and MMT, the most important being the sequence of events that emerge from loans and deposits, and from government spending and taxes.
chris1515
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This feels different because so much of the inflation is being driven by fuel prices which are being driven up by the restrictions on Russian oil and gas.

Boosting interest rates isn't going to impact oil supplies.
Eventually they can hammer down the demand, but it feels like we're using a monetary tool to address a mostly non-monetary problem.
jefe95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nope. Wrong. Rate hikes won't fix this. Those will make it worse.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chris1515 said:

This feels different because so much of the inflation is being driven by fuel prices which are being driven up by the restrictions on Russian oil and gas.

Boosting interest rates isn't going to impact oil supplies.
Eventually they can hammer down the demand, but it feels like we're using a monetary tool to address a mostly non-monetary problem.

except you seem to have bought into the propoganda of Biden. this is NOT because of a foreign war 6000 miles away which does not involve us.

inflation has been rising in parts of the economy for 27 straight months now.

gas prices were at all time highs before Putin invaded.

inflation has been rising since the month Joe Biden took office.

try again
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chris1515 said:

This feels different because so much of the inflation is being driven by fuel prices which are being driven up by the restrictions on Russian oil and gas.

Boosting interest rates isn't going to impact oil supplies.
Eventually they can hammer down the demand, but it feels like we're using a monetary tool to address a mostly non-monetary problem.
Pretty sure it's more related to the guy that said he would destroy the US O&G industry getting elected.

It's why Biden is going around the world trying to get OTHER people to produce more oil & gas.

Raising interest rates will absolutely wreck O&G demand and that will provide relief in pricing at the cost of world economy.

But hey, more people bought in to electric cars!
BlueHeeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Not 75 bps, not 100. We need 500. The Fed will admit to 9.1%, but we all know it's much higher. They have no control over inflation. There will be no soft landing.

Our options are to get ahead of this thing now and have a terrible correction, or continue raising rates a few basis points and chase inflation for a few years and have a potentially country-ending type of event happen at some point down the road.

I personally stand to make a lot more money with low interest rates, but this is the right thing to do for our country and our future, and it needs to be done sooner rather than later. The longer we wait, the worse it will be. To use Dr. Mark Dotzour's analogy, our country has had its face in the pile of cocaine for way too long. Time to go to rehab.
I couldn't have said this any better myself. Gas prices didn't cause this inflation. Supply chain issues did not cause this inflation. Here is the said cocaine pile that caused this inflation:

M2 (M2SL) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)

Unreal how some people can't understand how the # of dollars chasing the same amount of goods and services causes inflation. Goodness.
kyledr04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And for a lot of goods/services, the supply is lower because of covid shutdowns. Double whammy.
TxAG#2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Inflation could be topping out. We need to destroy the economy because something we don't know is happening could happen?
ToddyHill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My first mortgage was a steal back in 1983...at 10.75% fixed. Had a co-worker who had the same exact house but in a different area of the Metroplex...and his mortgage was 14%. Back then, it seemed everyone was financing about $75,000 to $100,000, and property taxes were next to nothing. I imagine the next 12 months will be interesting and eye opening.

Red Pear Realty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
TxAG#2011 said:

Inflation could be topping out. We need to destroy the economy because something we don't know is happening could happen?


What evidence do you have that inflation is slowing or about to top out? On the contrary, over the last two years, it's just gotten worse each month. I don't want to destroy the economy but more of what we've been doing absolutely will destroy us.
Sponsor Message: We Split Commissions. Full Service Agents in Austin, Bryan-College Station, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio. Red Pear Realty
Red Pear Luke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
ToddyHill said:

My first mortgage was a steal back in 1983...at 10.75% fixed. Had a co-worker who had the same exact house but in a different area of the Metroplex...and his mortgage was 14%. Back then, it seemed everyone was financing about $75,000 to $100,000, and property taxes were next to nothing. I imagine the next 12 months will be interesting and eye opening.


My favorite part is that our property taxes are already hovering around $16K/year and that is based on the value we bought at. Well there's been several new homes built and bought this year around the $800K mark and they are fixing to have tax bills closer to $20K.

Then you add in the PID and the other higher bills. Who can afford that?
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red Pear Realty said:

TxAG#2011 said:

Inflation could be topping out. We need to destroy the economy because something we don't know is happening could happen?


What evidence do you have that inflation is slowing or about to top out? On the contrary, over the last two years, it's just gotten worse each month. I don't want to destroy the economy but more of what we've been doing absolutely will destroy us.

Lumber Prices


Steel



Copper



WTI

BlueHeeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zoom out all your graphs to a 10yr timespan and repost.
Red Pear Realty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
Bonfire97 said:

Zoom out all your graphs to a 10yr timespan and repost.
Sponsor Message: We Split Commissions. Full Service Agents in Austin, Bryan-College Station, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio. Red Pear Realty
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wait, so are we talking about inflation over a 10 year span or the inflation that was most likely the impetus for this post?

The graphs I posted show obvious inflection points within the last three months. He asked for proof that inflation might have topped. That seems pretty pertinent.

I don't disagree that monetary inflation is debilitating and essentially taxation without representation.

YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bonfire97 said:

Quote:

Not 75 bps, not 100. We need 500. The Fed will admit to 9.1%, but we all know it's much higher. They have no control over inflation. There will be no soft landing.

Our options are to get ahead of this thing now and have a terrible correction, or continue raising rates a few basis points and chase inflation for a few years and have a potentially country-ending type of event happen at some point down the road.

I personally stand to make a lot more money with low interest rates, but this is the right thing to do for our country and our future, and it needs to be done sooner rather than later. The longer we wait, the worse it will be. To use Dr. Mark Dotzour's analogy, our country has had its face in the pile of cocaine for way too long. Time to go to rehab.
I couldn't have said this any better myself. Gas prices didn't cause this inflation. Supply chain issues did not cause this inflation. Here is the said cocaine pile that caused this inflation:

M2 (M2SL) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)

Unreal how some people can't understand how the # of dollars chasing the same amount of goods and services causes inflation. Goodness.
It's completely and utterly ignored at this point. Had another call with GS today...all about inflation and recession.

The printing of all that money was not mentioned ONCE as the cause or even a cause.

They did inform us though that inflation has peaked and they are projecting a tail off starting this month. Also recession is not likely at only a 25% chance. Apparently, the NBER, who gets the official call on recession, does not use the 2-quarter GDP rule of thumb so I'm not sure when that got jettisoned. They use a variety of indicators before they officially call a recession and only a few of those indicators have been triggered.

So, I guess we are all good.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One interesting tidbit that was called out is within the Used Car segment which has been a key indicator in supply constrained goods. Apparently, whole sale used car prices at auction have fallen in the last two months but consumer pricing has not budged. They were all perplexed by that and didn't understand why prices haven't dropped to the consumer.

I don't fully understand how the used car segment works behind the scenes so I have no comment here. Just thought it was interesting to hear.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Bonfire97 said:

Quote:

Not 75 bps, not 100. We need 500. The Fed will admit to 9.1%, but we all know it's much higher. They have no control over inflation. There will be no soft landing.

Our options are to get ahead of this thing now and have a terrible correction, or continue raising rates a few basis points and chase inflation for a few years and have a potentially country-ending type of event happen at some point down the road.

I personally stand to make a lot more money with low interest rates, but this is the right thing to do for our country and our future, and it needs to be done sooner rather than later. The longer we wait, the worse it will be. To use Dr. Mark Dotzour's analogy, our country has had its face in the pile of cocaine for way too long. Time to go to rehab.
I couldn't have said this any better myself. Gas prices didn't cause this inflation. Supply chain issues did not cause this inflation. Here is the said cocaine pile that caused this inflation:

M2 (M2SL) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)

Unreal how some people can't understand how the # of dollars chasing the same amount of goods and services causes inflation. Goodness.
It's completely and utterly ignored at this point. Had another call with GS today...all about inflation and recession.

The printing of all that money was not mentioned ONCE as the cause or even a cause.

They did inform us though that inflation has peaked and they are projecting a tail off starting this month. Also recession is not likely at only a 25% chance. Apparently, the NBER, who gets the official call on recession, does not use the 2-quarter GDP rule of thumb so I'm not sure when that got jettisoned. They use a variety of indicators before they officially call a recession and only a few of those indicators have been triggered.

So, I guess we are all good.
more gaslighting from the ruling Junta
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

One interesting tidbit that was called out is within the Used Car segment which has been a key indicator in supply constrained goods. Apparently, whole sale used car prices at auction have fallen in the last two months but consumer pricing has not budged. They were all perplexed by that and didn't understand why prices haven't dropped to the consumer.

I don't fully understand how the used car segment works behind the scenes so I have no comment here. Just thought it was interesting to hear.

Same dynamic as meat prices.

Input prices down, middle men juicing margins, end consumer doesn't realize benefit of falling prices upstream.
Cyp0111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You have seen a 20-30% retracement in commodities which drive one side of the equation bubble. The key drivers of food and energy cannot be printed and forcing a depression with a 500 bps rate increase will not solve the lack of capital investment. It will actually create longer term effects as you discourage key investment which is needed.

People always talk about raising the fed fund so high in the early 80s to combat inflation. It was actually a combination of 10 years of intense capex in energy + other commodities which eased the supply side of the equation.

Now, housing stock is a problem and that also seems to be supply driven. I'm not an expert there but sure seems rent growth etc. all is now front and center core CPI.

I think we are topping for the short term on some key headline driver sand the july print will moderate.
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting OP because a rate move like that could collapse housing prices
BlueHeeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The printing of all that money was not mentioned ONCE as the cause or even a cause.
I just don't understand why we are hearing so many figure heads who should know better saying there is no link. They are not that dumb. One theory I have is that they want inflation and don't want to bring attention to the root cause. Creating persistent inflation must be somewhere in the playbook of converting the US to socialism.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.