Is it a no-brainer place to park some cash? Seems to be doing quite a bit better than VTI that so many recommend. What are your thoughts on it?
I've owned BRK.B off and on for decades. I should have always been on as it beats the general market.lck90 said:
Is it a no-brainer place to park some cash? Seems to be doing quite a bit better than VTI that so many recommend. What are your thoughts on it?
1. Not a no-brainer to park some cash here. It pays no dividend, so depending on when you will need the cash, there are much better places at much lower risk than depending on what your capital gain will be at some point for BRK.B.lck90 said:
Is it a no-brainer place to park some cash? Seems to be doing quite a bit better than VTI that so many recommend. What are your thoughts on it?
I owned four shares of BRK.A at one time.double aught said:
Buncha lightweights. Get back to me when you get some BRK/A shares.
Without looking I think BRK.B has a higher return than VTIPetrino1 said:
If you own VTI, then you own BRK.B. Its the 9th largest holding for VTI at 1.4% of its total portfolio. Just VTI and chill
Agree with almost all of this -> as Buffett has said in the past, BRK is basically a bullish bet on the overall American economy.Kansas Kid said:
Brk/a and Brk/b will return very similar over time but B has better liquidity. While it does have a lot of exposure to AAPL, OXY, BAC, KO and a few other names, I think the real bets here are on insurance, BNSF and the energy company more than the stock holdings (other than AAPL). If you like those businesses long-term, which I do, this is a good place to park cash and defer all taxes since there are no dividends and likely never will. They have a huge advantage in insurance because of their size and ability to invest the float however they want. They also can write reinsurance policies where they have little competition due to the size of the policies.
I bleed maroon said:Agree with almost all of this -> as Buffett has said in the past, BRK is basically a bullish bet on the overall American economy.Kansas Kid said:
Brk/a and Brk/b will return very similar over time but B has better liquidity. While it does have a lot of exposure to AAPL, OXY, BAC, KO and a few other names, I think the real bets here are on insurance, BNSF and the energy company more than the stock holdings (other than AAPL). If you like those businesses long-term, which I do, this is a good place to park cash and defer all taxes since there are no dividends and likely never will. They have a huge advantage in insurance because of their size and ability to invest the float however they want. They also can write reinsurance policies where they have little competition due to the size of the policies.
The part we need more information on is more clarity on the "park your cash" component. I took the original post to mean that there was a near-term need for the cash, not that this was a buy-and-hold investment (as you are describing). I think the intended timing and use of the funds is critical to deciding whether or not this is a good fit. If liquidity is needed in 6,9, or 12 months, there are better choices, but if it's retirement money, go for it. Short-term parking and long-term parking are quite a bit different.
Then by all means, load up on BRK.B! I do think they will revert to the mean (VTI) over the years - tough to compete with Charlie and Warren's track record. Just for fun, here are current quotes (we can post updates over time to determine the "right" answer (bottom line, either is likely to be a good choice):lck90 said:
Probably should have used a better term than "park some cash." My intent was more directed towards long term investment vs short term. The 5+% yield on savings and CDs sure is nice for cash that could potentially be needed in the short term.
not accurateJSKolache said:
Comparison
https://www.google.com/finance/quote/BRK.B:NYSE?comparison=NYSEARCA%3AVTI&window=MAX