quote:
During VietNam the fighting in Korea was as hot as any action in 'Nam, on a more limited scale.
I am truly eager to see any historical references to substantiate this claim. It would make no sense at all given that ROK was sending a significant number of troops to fight along with US forces IN Vietnam. Why on earth would they be deploying forces to Vietnam if there was action "as hot as any in 'Nam" on their own peninsula?
Consider also that there was indeed a lethal incident in the DMZ in 1976 that became known as the "Tree Trimming Incident." It resulted in the killing of two US soldiers and nearly escalated to breaking the cease fire and an international crisis. If as you state there were firefights there in the previous ten years that were comparable to what was going on in Vietnam (1000 KIA per month at some points in 1968), how does the death of two persons end up recorded in the official histories and the presumptive death and wounding of hundreds more not even have a footnote?
There are 2154 entries at www.koreanwar.org for the decade of the 1960s and scanning them does not seem to support the idea that there was active fighting going on there. The Korean DMZ has always been a dangerous place but I don't find the claim of routine intense firefights there during the 1960s to be credible. Like I said, I'd love to read the references.
http://www.koreanwar.org/html/units/dmz/dmz_60_69.htmLastly, the list of names on the Korean War Memorial in Washington D.C. of those who were killed in hostilities there includes those killed in or along the DMZ since no peace treaty was signed. The names of those killed in the Tree Trimming Incident are there but I don't seek evidence of any during the 1960s (though I'm not ruling out that there may be a few, I cannot find a chronological listed of the dates).
http://www.abmc.gov/search/koreanwar.php[This message has been edited by Ulysses90 (edited 4/10/2013 10:48p).]