Aegis Ashore: Navy Needs Relief From Land

1,099 Views | 2 Replies | Last: 10 yr ago by Bodie Broadus
Azure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
http://breakingdefense.com/2015/07/aegis-ashore-navy-needs-relief-from-land/?print=1

CAPITOL HILL: Take my mission please. The armed services are notorious for overselling their capabilities and grabbing turf to justify budgets. But when it comes to ballistic missile defense, the Navy feels so overburdened that it is talking up land-based alternatives as superior to its vaunted Aegis ships.



"Anything that goes ashoreis the best way to defend ashore," Rear Adm. Peter Fanta, director of surface warfare, told reporters after a June hearing on the Hill. "It allows more power, more aperture [for sensors], and a permanent presence there to cover that area."

An Aegis Ashore site, like those now being built in Romania and, soon, Poland, isn't limited by the size of a ship's hull. That means it can accommodate larger radar arrays to detect incoming missiles and larger numbers of interceptors to shoot them down. (Lockheed builds both the ship and shore versions of Aegis, which both fire the Raytheon Standard Missile). What's more, a land base doesn't have to sail home periodically for crew rest, training, and repairs.

"I have to maintain my ships, [so they] may come off the station for a little while," Fanta said. One Aegis Ashore site provides as many days of coverage as four Aegis ships but costs less than a single ship.
Pro Sandy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Makes sense. Takes a lot to keep ships going and the BMD ships are doing nothing but BMD.
DogCo84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My son is a budding Navy Fire Controlman--about to finish A school. He's looking at Aegis as a career weapon system. They have actually been told that land-based Aegis may be a great shore-billet for the FC career field. Of course, needs of the Navy control.

I'm guessing that another part of the problem discussed here may be a system manning issues? My son is looking at about 2 years in school to be qualified for Aegis (from enlistment to FC A School, to graduation from Aegis C School). It's a highly technical field. You can't just spin up more Aegis folks overnight.
Bodie Broadus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From what I've seen, BMD afloat was more successful than the land support. I remember there being more failed flight tests from land than from sea. That was the case when I was on the USS Lake Erie from 2004-2008.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.