dixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
Sorry. Sip is pretty average. Regardless of how everybody wants to fluff them upt - cam said:dixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
How would that be like us? We haven't lost to even an average team all year.
Luke The Drifter said:
UCF is also incredibly average. I don't think we'll lose to LSU, but we have lost on the road to two so-so teams already this year, and blew double digit second half leads in both.
Again, I think we beat LSU on Saturday, but there is precedent this season that shows it's possible.
jphelmet said:Luke The Drifter said:
UCF is also incredibly average. I don't think we'll lose to LSU, but we have lost on the road to two so-so teams already this year, and blew double digit second half leads in both.
Again, I think we beat LSU on Saturday, but there is precedent this season that shows it's possible.
So losing to two mediocre teams (one being the first game of the season, and one a rivalry game) on the road- would be the same as getting "run out of the gym" by a nowhere near average lsu?
We haven't been run out of the gym by anyone, except maybe Florida.
The mental gymnastics to be overly pessimistic devoid of any evidence to the contrary on this board is baffling.
Seven Costanza said:
I don't see why it matters, not that I really care either way. It's the difference between playing 12/13, then 4 vs. 11/14, then 3. The 11-14 teams all seem pretty similar, as does Tennessee/Alabama.
dixichkn said:Sorry. Sip is pretty average. Regardless of how everybody wants to fluff them upt - cam said:dixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
How would that be like us? We haven't lost to even an average team all year.
NCAA tournament seeding is not tied to conference standings. We are not battling with Mizzou for a better NCAA tourney seed, that hay is already in the barnSq 17 said:Seven Costanza said:
I don't see why it matters, not that I really care either way. It's the difference between playing 12/13, then 4 vs. 11/14, then 3. The 11-14 teams all seem pretty similar, as does Tennessee/Alabama.
It matters because the SEC is going to dominate the 1,2,3 seed lines for the Big Tourney
If we are a clear #5in the SEC we should land on the 3 if we are 6 th we might be on the 3 line
The 7 th & 8th place teams will be 4 or lower
The double bye is technically still in play for Texas A&M in the SEC Tournament 👍
— Luke Evangelist (@lukeevangelist_) March 5, 2025
Below is a detailed report on what needs to happen this week for A&M to clinch it.
Using KenPom probabilities, the probability of A&M earning the No. 4 seed is 0.0411%.https://t.co/iZMWBroqU6 pic.twitter.com/9I9ANp1Vwi
this Saturday, the Ags will tag Tiger ass for the fourth time this seasondixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
ExtremeRush said:
Tenn is most likely going to be the 3 and Bama the 4 seed as Tenn has head to head vs Bama. So if we're the 5, we'll likely play Bama if we win our first game.
Sq 17 said:Seven Costanza said:
I don't see why it matters, not that I really care either way. It's the difference between playing 12/13, then 4 vs. 11/14, then 3. The 11-14 teams all seem pretty similar, as does Tennessee/Alabama.
It matters because the SEC is going to dominate the 1,2,3 seed lines for the Big Tourney
If we are a clear #5in the SEC we should land on the 3 if we are 6 th we might be on the 3 line
The 7 th & 8th place teams will be 4 or lower
dixichkn said:Sorry. Sip is pretty average. Regardless of how everybody wants to fluff them upt - cam said:dixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
How would that be like us? We haven't lost to even an average team all year.
texasaggies987 said:dixichkn said:Sorry. Sip is pretty average. Regardless of how everybody wants to fluff them upt - cam said:dixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
How would that be like us? We haven't lost to even an average team all year.
Sips are not average. They are a tournament team and we beat the hell of them at home. It took a miraculous comeback from them in Austin to beat us by 1 point. We have not lost to a bad team the whole year.
Are you new to Texags? That occurs on every board on here.jphelmet said:Luke The Drifter said:
UCF is also incredibly average. I don't think we'll lose to LSU, but we have lost on the road to two so-so teams already this year, and blew double digit second half leads in both.
Again, I think we beat LSU on Saturday, but there is precedent this season that shows it's possible.
So losing to two mediocre teams (one being the first game of the season, and one a rivalry game) on the road- would be the same as getting "run out of the gym" by a nowhere near average lsu?
We haven't been run out of the gym by anyone, except maybe Florida.
The mental gymnastics to be overly pessimistic devoid of any evidence to the contrary on this board is baffling.
t - cam said:dixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
How would that be like us? We haven't lost to even an average team all year.
Aggie Dad 26 said:t - cam said:dixichkn said:
Unfortunately……..(wet blanket alert)
It would be just like us to beat #1 convincingly wire to wire and then get run out of the gym by sorry ass swamptard
How would that be like us? We haven't lost to even an average team all year.
Lol. Not even sure you're being serious?
Tamuco99 said:NCAA tournament seeding is not tied to conference standings. We are not battling with Mizzou for a better NCAA tourney seed, that hay is already in the barnSq 17 said:Seven Costanza said:
I don't see why it matters, not that I really care either way. It's the difference between playing 12/13, then 4 vs. 11/14, then 3. The 11-14 teams all seem pretty similar, as does Tennessee/Alabama.
It matters because the SEC is going to dominate the 1,2,3 seed lines for the Big Tourney
If we are a clear #5in the SEC we should land on the 3 if we are 6 th we might be on the 3 line
The 7 th & 8th place teams will be 4 or lower
So basically, Mizzou needs a lot of hypothetical scenarios to go their way just to draw even with us, and even then the trump card is an Aggie win in Columbia. We're goodSq 17 said:Tamuco99 said:NCAA tournament seeding is not tied to conference standings. We are not battling with Mizzou for a better NCAA tourney seed, that hay is already in the barnSq 17 said:Seven Costanza said:
I don't see why it matters, not that I really care either way. It's the difference between playing 12/13, then 4 vs. 11/14, then 3. The 11-14 teams all seem pretty similar, as does Tennessee/Alabama.
It matters because the SEC is going to dominate the 1,2,3 seed lines for the Big Tourney
If we are a clear #5in the SEC we should land on the 3 if we are 6 th we might be on the 3 line
The 7 th & 8th place teams will be 4 or lower
I did not say standings I said clear #5 in the conference
Standings are a good place to start the evaluation but schedules are unbalanced and HTH is not great because most matchups are played only once bringing the home court variable in
Standings resume predictive metrics is how the committee will rank the SEC teams
SEC 1- 4 are all going to be on the 1 or 2 line SEC 5 will get the 3 line if we beat LSU and win 2 games at the tourney than it is the Ags otherwise it could be UK
Regarding Mizzou if the Ags lose their next 2 and Mizzou wins 3 in a row they are likely right back in the discussion of who is the 5th best team in the conference
Adam87inSA said:
Down goes Mizzou
