Yale Analytics/Scouting Report

3,001 Views | 25 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by ParkerAg
fightintxag13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll be honest, this Yale matchup has me a little concerned, so I did a deep dive into them. Here's what I found.

Here are Yale's KenPom Ratings (National Ranking)

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency - 115.1 Points/100 possessions (58th)
Adjusted Defensive Efficiency - 104.1 Points/100 possessions (117th)

These 2 metrics are adjusted for opponents faced.

Fightin' Texas Aggies

AdjOE - 116.2 Points/100 possessions (42nd)
AdjDE - 92.1 Points/100 possessions (7th)

Clearly Yale is an inferior team on paper to us. Hence why they're a 13 seed and we're a 4 seed.

However, let's dive a lot deeper into this.

Obviously our offense goes as how frequently we get second chances. Yale has the 14th best Rebounding Margin in the country (Ags are 3rd), but that is against primarily mid-major opponents. Ags grab 40% of our misses (#1 nationally) while Yale grabs 77% of opponents' misses (#21 nationally). Yale does this by gang rebounding. They will send 4-5 guys crashing to the boards when their opponent shoots. This means they don't try to push much for transition points.

Defensively they don't try to heat up a ballhandler like we do, especially on perimeter screens. They will go under screens all day long. If Wade and Phelps are hot, they'll get PLENTY of good looks at the 3 ball. If they're not, we better not fall in love with the 3 ball unless we are grabbing a lot of the misses. This could be a big game for Wilcher since they go under screens so much.

They will double the post down low, and they will bring help on penetration because their MO is to plug the paint. They force opponents into jump shots at a 98th percentile rate. They will start helping off as soon as a ballhandler gets inside the 3 point line. This also helps them begin to get into rebounding positioning. They have one rim protector in Aletan (6'10"), but outside of him, they protect the paint by throwing bodies at you and they don't foul that much. This plays very well into defending our dribble penetration. This will also leave kick-out shooters open. Yes, unfortunately we will probably see Solo and Jace shoot a few 3's each. However, due to how Yale plugs the paint with numbers and doesn't foul, we will have to shoot and make some 3's. Phelps, Wade, and Manny cannot continually force the issue at the rim if we're not getting calls.

Offensively they are a lot like us in that they don't take a ton of jump shots. They are in the 8th percentile nationally in jump shot generated offense. This is because they post up on the blocks (90th percentile in post up rate) and run a lot of motion off screeners. They're also in the 80th percentile in pick & roll ballhandler rate. They want to get shots in the paint regardless of what it takes to get there. They'll let Aletan post up and go to work, but they'll also use screens or motion to get their smaller size bigs (Townsend - 6'7" and Simmons - 6'6") into leveraged positioning. They're guards will also try to penetrate here and there, but I wouldn't say they do it as often as we do. They aren't going to force it all the way to the rack like Manny and Phelps do, but that's because their other 4 guys won't be standing around when it happens. They will be getting other guys open or into better positioning while the drive is happening, and they will maintain good spacing. However, this is what makes them a poorer offensive rebounding team than us. They aren't going to send 3 or 4 guys after an offensive board. They will primarily rely on their 2 bigs down low to work the glass, and they do pretty good for themselves. Nowhere near elite.

Rebounding summary is they're the opposite of us. They REALLY emphasize limiting opponent second chances, but they only put forth an ok effort into offensive rebounding.

Poulakidas is the clear leader of this offense, though. He has the ability to shoot well from all 3 levels and is a decent shooter in traffic. He has a pretty stroke. He is about the only one that will pull up for jump shots, but that's because he's comfortable shooting them and he can hit them. We all know about their 3 PT% (38.5%, #9 Nationally), but they don't shoot a ton of 3's per game (19.5 attempts/game, #308 Nationally). The 3 ball is not what they're primarily looking for, but when they inevitably get good looks at them from their off-ball screens and motion, they will take and make them at a high clip. Poulakidas is really the only one that will take contested 3's, but he will run the offense some before he fires.

Our switching will help eliminate shooters coming open from their off-ball movement, but we have to stay in front of their guards on the dribble drive to prevent having to go into rotation. It is especially important with how well Yale spaces the floor. Allowing penetration will kill us because they have multiple guys that shoot 3's well, despite they're fewer attempts. If we don't stay in front of them, it's going to be a very uneasy night for us.


SUMMARY KEYS TO THE GAME

DEFENSE...STAY IN FRONT OF THEIR GUARDS. STAY IN FRONT OF THEIR GUARDS. STAY IN FRONT OF THEIR GUARDS. They're screens and motion don't scare me because we switch everything. They'll get us switched into mismatches some in their pick & roll game, but not enough to kill us doing it. If we stay in front of their guards, they won't be able to score enough to keep up with us because they won't want to take enough contested 3's to stay with us. If we give them open 3 looks, I believe they'll take well above their season average in attempts.

OFFENSE...Test their lack of athleticism down low early on dribble drive and with our bigs. If we're getting calls, pour it on them. If not, we will have to hit some pretty good looks from 3. They will give them to us all day long because they aren't athletic enough to guard both levels. Wilcher needs to get some bigger minutes in this game because he will be able to get open often. However, we shouldn't just take 3's every time we get that open look if we're not hitting them. They will likely be able to limit our offensive rebound rate to below our season average just by throwing sheer numbers at the glass.

Overall, if we stay out of foul trouble (looking at you Solo and Payne), our athletes will just flat out-athlete them. If we can hit better than ~30% of our 3's, we're going to be scouting the Michigan/UCSD game after ours to start prep for round 2.

BTHO Yale!!
aggie-1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Going to be honest....I didn't read all that, but is there a team in the tournament that you wouldn't be concerned with? I feel like it wouldn't matter who we were matched with, there would be concern. Likely for most of the same reasons you laid out above.
CapCityAg89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great read and nice job!!

Wilcher actually intrigues me this game too. He was clearly not ready to help in our defense at the beginning of the year (better but not great now) which limited his court time. Then SEC defenders were great at limiting his touches. I think it would be fun to see him get like 10-12 attempts this game. He averages about 3 but that seems higher of late and against less capable defenders, he might just go off.
CapCityAg89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dude?! WTF? Open the thread. See a long OP and close it. He put some great effort in there. Read it or no, but your comment was unnecessary.
aggie-1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CapCityAg89 said:

Dude?! WTF? Open the thread. See a long OP and close it. He put some great effort in there. Read it or no, but your comment was unnecessary.
Calm down. I said I didn't read all of it. I didn't say I didn't read any of it. And all I was asking is if there was anyone in the bracket that wouldn't concern us. Based on how we play week to week, I think every team in the tourney would be a concern. Stop trying to be the righteous police of TexAgs and spend a minute trying to understand what people are posting.
caleblyn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well done OP!
agman_05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great post!

Andy is also going to be an x factor as well, especially with his recent 3 point shooting success. He is 9 for his last 11 and if he makes a few that will open things up even more.
fightintxag13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think any of the 14 seeds or lower would've had me concerned had we gotten a 3 seed. Not saying that it would've been a guaranteed win because March and all, but none of those teams would scare me at all. The only other 13 seed that would have me as concerned as Yale does is High Point.

I didn't write this for casual fans either. Not saying you are one by any means. This was more for my fellow stats nerds and for other fans like me that are excited to get this started and/or bored at work with time.
ParkerAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree, well thought out OP. If we just play a good game, not even a great game we win this. We really have to fall apart on D and somebody from Yale just go berserk on us to lose this in my humble opinion.
fightintxag13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ParkerAg said:

Agree, well thought out OP. If we just play a good game, not even a great game we win this. We really have to fall apart on D and somebody from Yale just go berserk on us to lose this in my humble opinion.
From Yale's side, the obvious one would be Poulakidas, but despite his build (6'7" - 240), Townsend could be their notorious "second or third option" that could get hot against us. He shoots it well from deep, but that's a pretty small part of his game.
TjgtAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great stuff, thanks for posting!

Offensively, Yale should be a concern for us (or any 4 seed) because they do play sound basketball and are crazy efficient from 3pt, even though they don't.

The questions for me regarding their ability to play with us is on the defensive side of the ball and their ability to not foul. In their 3 higher-level OOC games, they fouled much more than in conference play, so it makes me wonder if their low foul rate is more a product of their true defensive ability, or the level of competition. We should test that early and often, especially inside. Feels like this should be a game where Payne plays a lot and we go right at their 6-10 big, as he is the only real inside presence they have.

I saw that similar "gang rebounding" formation you did in some of their highlights from this year, so tap-outs might be a big part of our offensive rebounding strategy, and could lead to open, uncontested 3s for Wade/Phelps/Wilcher/Hefner.

First 5-8 minutes will tell a lot. Can we stay in front of them on defense and don't allow open 3s due to penetration? If yes, feels like it should be hard for them to get open looks from the outside. On offense, can we get into the lane and not turn the ball over? Getting shots up at the rim on aggressive drives is key, but we have to actually get the shots up.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
in a nutshell this game comes down to us. we make our shots, make our free throws, play great defense and rebound we win. would rather play a team that if we play good to great we win then a team that can beat us on our best night. we take care of business we win this game by 6-10 pts.
NyAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great post by the op

As for wilcher, the fact that we are calling for more minutes from him probably means buzz will barely play him and we'll be banging our heads against the wall about it if we lose
CapCityAg89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggie-1997 said:

CapCityAg89 said:

Dude?! WTF? Open the thread. See a long OP and close it. He put some great effort in there. Read it or no, but your comment was unnecessary.
Calm down. I said I didn't read all of it. I didn't say I didn't read any of it. And all I was asking is if there was anyone in the bracket that wouldn't concern us. Based on how we play week to week, I think every team in the tourney would be a concern. Stop trying to be the righteous police of TexAgs and spend a minute trying to understand what people are posting.

I'm calm. Just seemed like you read the first sentence, decided the post was too long and made what seemed to be a snarky comment about the post. No policing necessary but also stand by the fact that "I didn't read all of that" is unnecessary.

It's the tournament, yes, aside from the 1-3 v 14-16 matchups, everyone should be worried. So sure, I guess you're right.
jeremy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This gets me giddy:

"This could be a big game for Wilcher since they go under screens so much."
aggie-1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CapCityAg89 said:

aggie-1997 said:

CapCityAg89 said:

Dude?! WTF? Open the thread. See a long OP and close it. He put some great effort in there. Read it or no, but your comment was unnecessary.
Calm down. I said I didn't read all of it. I didn't say I didn't read any of it. And all I was asking is if there was anyone in the bracket that wouldn't concern us. Based on how we play week to week, I think every team in the tourney would be a concern. Stop trying to be the righteous police of TexAgs and spend a minute trying to understand what people are posting.

I'm calm. Just seemed like you read the first sentence, decided the post was too long and made what seemed to be a snarky comment about the post. No policing necessary but also stand by the fact that "I didn't read all of that" is unnecessary.

It's the tournament, yes, aside from the 1-3 v 14-16 matchups, everyone should be worried. So sure, I guess you're right.
So you read my post, made assumptions and made unnecessary and snarky comments. There was nothing snarky about my reply. Again it was centered around the team we are and that most teams should worry us because we are not the most consistent team in the field.
BkYdPitmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where's midnight Yale tonight?
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jeremy said:

This gets me giddy:

"This could be a big game for Wilcher since they go under screens so much."



That would be a bigger deal if Wilcher could handle.
jeremy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed. But if he gets going, could be amazing!
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

This plays very well into defending our dribble penetration. This will also leave kick-out shooters open. Yes, unfortunately we will probably see Solo and Jace shoot a few 3's each.
this worries me alot more than Yales 3pt shooting. how we lose is if they bait us into alot of 3s like penn state did 2 years ago
fightintxag13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DTP02 said:

jeremy said:

This gets me giddy:

"This could be a big game for Wilcher since they go under screens so much."



That would be a bigger deal if Wilcher could handle.


Indeed, but Buzz actually does a pretty good job of actually running some set plays for Wilcher when he's in there. Yale is going to go under those screens too.
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Auburn had a 7 point lead at half-time over Yale in last year's 13 seed over 4 seed upset.

And Auburn then led 68-58 with 7:35 remaining in the second half.

Auburn then proceeded to turn the ball over on 4 of their next 6 possessions, while also fouling Yale giving them several freebies at the line and so forth. Basically, Auburn played absolutely terrible for about 4 minutes of that game from 7:35' to about 3' remaining in the second half, choking away a game that they had controlled much of.

So the question is, do we think Cinderella lightening will strike twice in the same place with Yale pulling off back-to-back 13-seed over 4 seed upsets? Will A&M gift them an equally terrible stretch late in the second half as Auburn did last year, turning it over on possession after possession while fouling Yale a bunch giving them easy points at the FT line? Or will A&M do what Auburn should have (and was expected to do) those last 7-8 minutes of their game last year and simply finish with a 7-10 point win? We'll see. the odds are against lightening striking twice in the same place...but hey, its sports and March Madness. An A&M win is of course the most likely outcome.

greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Without being able to compare oranges and oranres…if they can generate that offensive efficiency mostly out of a half court offense, it could turn into a boxing match with last shot winning after going toe to toe most of the game…
NyAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pumpkinhead said:

Auburn had a 7 point lead at half-time over Yale in last year's 13 seed over 4 seed upset.

And Auburn then led 68-58 with 7:35 remaining in the second half.

Auburn then proceeded to turn the ball over on 4 of their next 6 possessions, while also fouling Yale giving them several freebies at the line and so forth. Basically, Auburn played absolutely terrible for about 4 minutes of that game from 7:35' to about 3' remaining in the second half, choking away a game that they had controlled much of.

So the question is, do we think Cinderella lightening will strike twice in the same place with Yale pulling off back-to-back 13-seed over 4 seed upsets? Will A&M gift them an equally terrible stretch late in the second half as Auburn did last year, turning it over on possession after possession while fouling Yale a bunch giving them easy points at the FT line? Or will A&M do what Auburn should have (and was expected to do) those last 7-8 minutes of their game last year and simply finish with a 7-10 point win? We'll see, but I do think the odds are against lightening striking twice in the same place...but hey, its sports and March Madness. But an A&M win is of course more likely.




We've been pretty consistent with having g. Ad stretches of play within Gabe's even when we win, so it's quite possible we have a bad stretch vs Yale
We just can't let it beat us

Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mentioned it on another thread, but also worth remembering that Chad Baker Mazara got tossed three minutes into the game on a pretty soft flagrant 2 call.
ParkerAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A positive for us is we have pretty consistently been a good second half team. If we are ahead or say within 3 or 5 at half, I think we win going away. They will be beat up by the end of this....
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.