Any theories as to why so few mins for him?
halfastros81 said:
I didn't feel that way when they cut it to single digits and the one guy looked to be feeling it from behind the arc but the Ags did a good job keeping them at arm's length.
Mikeyshooter said:
If we're being honest, Henry hasn't been that good this season and should have had his minutes reduced a long time ago.
bobinator said:
Henry needs space to be effective and Yale was absolutely not going to give it to us. The paint was just incredibly crowded. Payne doesn't need as much space because he's both plays (and is) a lot bigger than Coleman but he can also go get the ball vertically.
Just wasn't a good game flow and matchup for him with the way Yale was playing. It absolutely was a good game flow and matchup for Payne though.
I expect he'll play quite a bit more against Michigan.
bobinator said:
But their guards will actually guard us instead of hanging out down there too. Just too many bodies around against Yale. Some of Coleman's better games have been against big teams because they have to come guard him in the high post and that little one dribble move he has is more effective. Especially if they're lumbering bigs and not super athletic ones.
Fanatic15...Drs2B! said:bobinator said:
But their guards will actually guard us instead of hanging out down there too. Just too many bodies around against Yale. Some of Coleman's better games have been against big teams because they have to come guard him in the high post and that little one dribble move he has is more effective. Especially if they're lumbering bigs and not super athletic ones.
Would Michigan count as a "big team"?
I like it that alot of our players (like Henry) rotated in and out do that minutes for some were reduced - and all (except perhaps Payne- who played more minutes that typical) should be relatively fresh for Saturday's game.
we dont have bigs that can shoot or dribble like Wolff canCapCityAg89 said:Fanatic15...Drs2B! said:bobinator said:
But their guards will actually guard us instead of hanging out down there too. Just too many bodies around against Yale. Some of Coleman's better games have been against big teams because they have to come guard him in the high post and that little one dribble move he has is more effective. Especially if they're lumbering bigs and not super athletic ones.
Would Michigan count as a "big team"?
I like it that alot of our players (like Henry) rotated in and out do that minutes for some were reduced - and all (except perhaps Payne- who played more minutes that typical) should be relatively fresh for Saturday's game.
Yes. Our bigs are markedly smaller (even Payne) but markedly more athletic. Classic matchup. We'll see.
bobinator said:
If I had to pick one thing that this comes down to it's whether we can force turnovers. Michigan is gonna make shots against us. But if we are our usual selves on the boards then we can make up for it with rebounding and turnovers.
Michigan is VERY turnover prone, especially Wolf. He has a turnover rate five points higher than anyone on our team.