tjack16 said:
203Raggie said:
tjack16 said:
203Raggie said:
While I'm getting critiqued on the quality of the throw required. I support the idea of pushing it. This team was not going to get two more hits.
Better to put us in a position to try to tie it with one hit. Binderup needs to drop the anchor.
And that throw was pretty darn good. I'll rewatch the replay but I think the throw was better than most of yall are giving RJ credit for. Just on arm strength alone.
ETA: I watched it again. That was a strong throw. I stand my ground on that.
It was a great throw… which that guy makes all the time. He's an excellent defender. I'd imagine it's in the scouting report. That makes the decision even dumber.
I'm not disputing that. But an offline throw means the tying run is standing in second. Or he gets thrown out and we are spared from watching Bear strike out.
Just think about the odds for a minute and get back to me.
So the strategy is banking on an elite defender making a bad throw? Interesting…
Imagine if buzz told our guys to leave Michigan's top 3 point shooter wide open all game because odds are he'll miss 6 out of 10.
It also wasn't even that great of a throw
I'm not saying it was the smartest decision. I'm just saying that I get the idea of pushing a guy into scoring position.
The throw was better than everyone is giving him credit for and binderup apparently is slower than most would think.
I'm not even saying a bad throw gets him in. But the CF is moving backwards to field the ball. Turns and fires a shot into second. It's a significantly better than average throw for college baseball.
He didn't make it. Everyone that wants to be upset can point that out. I'd rather push our luck and maybe get a bloop to tie that game rather than rely on a team that struck out 30 times to try to swing for the fences or get two more hits.