tamc91 said:
On all the SEC Baseball rankings I'm seeing, including TexAgs, they have t.u. ranked above A&M even though our records are the same and we won the head-to-head series.
What's up with that?
jkag89 said:
Auburn has a better overall record as does Kentucky.
jkag89 said:
We have the same league and overall record as sippie, yes? That being the case a simple way to sort them is alphabetically. It is not a slight, Stankey does not hate us.
McInnis said:tamc91 said:
On all the SEC Baseball rankings I'm seeing, including TexAgs, they have t.u. ranked above A&M even though our records are the same and we won the head-to-head series.
What's up with that?
Before anyone says it's alphabetical order, they have Auburn over Arkansas (both at 9-8) and Kentucky over Alabama (both at 8-8). In those cases it looks like they used non-conference records as the tie breaker. But they didn't use that for the Aggies/sip.
There's only one logical explanation: Stankey hates us.
tamc91 said:
On all the SEC Baseball rankings I'm seeing, including TexAgs, they have t.u. ranked above A&M even though our records are the same and we won the head-to-head series.
What's up with that?
missinAggieland said:
I know it's women's golf, but, go ahead and explain this:
greg.w.h said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexicographic_order
I'll add that ASCII and superset Unicode are common lexical ordering methods. Strangely enough, at my first programming job they implemented a hash that caused some very odd ordering and I had to go to the vp of research and development to get permission to correct it. He has gotten used to me showing up and said, "if it's broken, fix it."
94chem said:greg.w.h said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexicographic_order
I'll add that ASCII and superset Unicode are common lexical ordering methods. Strangely enough, at my first programming job they implemented a hash that caused some very odd ordering and I had to go to the vp of research and development to get permission to correct it. He has gotten used to me showing up and said, "if it's broken, fix it."
Implementing hash causes lots of odd things.
tamc91 said:
On all the SEC Baseball rankings I'm seeing, including TexAgs, they have t.u. ranked above A&M even though our records are the same and we won the head-to-head series.
What's up with that?
LB12MEEN said:
OP calling them rankings instead of standings messed this thread up from the start!
94chem said:LB12MEEN said:
OP calling them rankings instead of standings messed this thread up from the start!
But he is right. We did score more points than t.u. in both matches, and should have been over them in the rankings, in the event of a deadlock in the federation ledger.
twk said:94chem said:LB12MEEN said:
OP calling them rankings instead of standings messed this thread up from the start!
But he is right. We did score more points than t.u. in both matches, and should have been over them in the rankings, in the event of a deadlock in the federation ledger.
When you can tell me the proper order for the entire standings, applying the tie breakers all the way down and not just for our tie with the sips last week, then I'll listen to complaints about not applying the tie breaker in this case. Otherwise, it's just another case of selective outrage.
The things some people worry about.
