farmrag said:
FrioAg 00 said:
I'm willing to take that remote risk to protect the economy
So Grandma and Grandpa dying is ok as long as the economy is protected?
They should take the proper precautions themselves. If they don't, it isn't society's fault. This crisis can't be solved by action plans revolving around a single goal of "reduce the number of deaths From the virus" or "prolong the peak". There are other considerations at play and they all must be considered. It does not appear that they are.
I'm not asking society to pay that high price for my elderly relatives. This is going to be social meltdown in a few weeks if we don't pull our heads out and let this continue into the summer. This is what happens when you disrupt the supply chain in a JIT world.
"If even one life is saved" isn't a valid approach to allocation of resources. Millions of otherwise unaffected people are going to be out of jobs. Thousands or tens of thousands of bankrupt businesses because of mandatory government shutdowns. Many more people will die because if that than because of the disease.
It remains to be seen If their austerity measures will help relieve this financial burden. Either way, there's a point of no return there.