99% of those who died from CV had other illness-Italy

6,200 Views | 39 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by WorkerBee
Exsurge Domine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/99-of-those-who-died-from-virus-had-other-illness-italy-says

Quote:


More than 99% of Italy's coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to a study by the country's national health authority.

After deaths from the virus reached more than 2,500, with a 150% increase in the past week, health authorities have been combing through data to provide clues to help combat the spread of the disease.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most of the folks that died had hypertension, diabetes, and/or heart disease.

Not necessarily good news for Texas.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
More than 99%... hmmm I'm a little suspect of these stats
Exsurge Domine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[url=https://ibb.co/nzcV1mT][/url]
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, I am getting the feeling tomorrow is the upward see saw day on wall street.
FrioAg 00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
23% of people in Italy are over 65, so it doesn't surprise me they have other health issues
walton91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe I read that Italy has the oldest population in Europe, which certainly is a contributing factor in their death rate. Of course Japan has an old population too, and not near as many deaths
FrioAg 00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
India has a very very young population (less than 6% over 65), and despite horrid health conditions and lack of healthcare infrastructure they are having very little impact
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Exsurge Domine said:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/99-of-those-who-died-from-virus-had-other-illness-italy-says

Quote:


More than 99% of Italy's coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to a study by the country's national health authority.

After deaths from the virus reached more than 2,500, with a 150% increase in the past week, health authorities have been combing through data to provide clues to help combat the spread of the disease.

I think this is HUGE news if accurate ...
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
walton91 said:

I believe I read that Italy has the oldest population in Europe, which certainly is a contributing factor in their death rate. Of course Japan has an old population too, and not near as many deaths
It helped that Japan didn't twiddle their thumbs like Italy did. If they had done everything possible when the first cases appeared, it could have very easily been slowed to a crawl.

Of course, it didn't help that Italy had that super spreader running all over the place for 4-5 days after he was diagnosed with it.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If this number is accurate, I actually don't think this bodes well for a lot of people in the United States. Diabetes and hypertension are out of control here. Diabetes and hypertension is what leads to heart disease in a lot of cases.

Most older people in the United States have hypertension at bare minimum.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FrioAg 00 said:

India has a very very young population (less than 6% over 65), and despite horrid health conditions and lack of healthcare infrastructure they are having very little impact
India is also doing virtually no testing.
vansprinkle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Moxley said:

If this number is accurate, I actually don't think this bodes well for a lot of people in the United States. Diabetes and hypertension are out of control here. Diabetes and hypertension is what leads to heart disease in a lot of cases.

Most older people in the United States have hypertension at bare minimum.


https://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-pressure/news/20130404/nearly-30-percent-of-americans-have-high-blood-pressure-cdc
TxAG#2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AustinAg2K said:

FrioAg 00 said:

India has a very very young population (less than 6% over 65), and despite horrid health conditions and lack of healthcare infrastructure they are having very little impact
India is also doing virtually no testing.
They also bathe in cow ***** I am sure their immune system's have seen worse.
Jet Black
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TxAG#2011 said:

AustinAg2K said:

FrioAg 00 said:

India has a very very young population (less than 6% over 65), and despite horrid health conditions and lack of healthcare infrastructure they are having very little impact
India is also doing virtually no testing.
They also bathe in cow ***** I am sure their immune system's have seen worse.
longeryak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FrioAg 00 said:

23% of people in Italy are over 65, so it doesn't surprise me they have other health issues
We lead the world in diabetes and obesity and are third in heart diseases all of which are co-morbidities.
MemorialTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moxley said:

If this number is accurate, I actually don't think this bodes well for a lot of people in the United States. Diabetes and hypertension are out of control here. Diabetes and hypertension is what leads to heart disease in a lot of cases.

Most older people in the United States have hypertension at bare minimum.


Well, considering that those with an illness are a subset of all, it's better than if dead were across all health groups including those healthy.
Mantis Toboggan MD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Moxley said:

Most of the folks that died had hypertension, diabetes, and/or heart disease.

Not necessarily good news for Texas America.
FIFY
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder if that includes those whose hypertension is controlled via medication or if it doesn't matter.
Post removed:
by user
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Moxley said:

Most of the folks that died had hypertension, diabetes, and/or heart disease.

Not necessarily good news for Texas.
Of course, don't most above 50 or 60 have at least one of those? I've never been over weight and I've had hypertension and heart disease since my 20s (just hereditary).
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're tanking the world's economy and people's livelihood saving people who don't care about their own health and are already one bad flu case away from death...
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieFrog said:

Wonder if that includes those whose hypertension is controlled via medication or if it doesn't matter.
My question as well.
TheAngelFlight
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NASAg03 said:

We're tanking the world's economy and people's livelihood saving people who don't care about their own health and are already one bad flu case away from death...
This is incredibly ignorant.
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. Of the 2.86 million people that died last year in the US, 2.06 million were 65 and older.

Meaning that the majority of people that die from coronavirus are already going to die this year. They aren't getting extra 5 or 10 years of life.

Let that sink in.

2.06 million people aged 65+ will die this year. Sad fact of reality, but tell me why we shutting down the world to prevent the inevitable from happening this year.
CT75
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NASAg03 said:

No. Of the 2.86 million people that died last year in the US, 2.06 million were 65 and older.

Meaning that the majority of people that die from coronavirus are already going to die this year. They aren't getting extra 5 or 10 years of life.

Let that sink in.

2.06 million people aged 65+ will die this year. Sad fact of reality, but tell me why we shutting down the world to prevent the inevitable from happening this year.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NASAg03 said:

No. Of the 2.86 million people that died last year in the US, 2.06 million were 65 and older.

Meaning that the majority of people that die from coronavirus are already going to die this year. They aren't getting extra 5 or 10 years of life.

Let that sink in.

2.06 million people aged 65+ will die this year. Sad fact of reality, but tell me why we shutting down the world to prevent the inevitable from happening this year.

Everyone dies some day, the goal is to put that off as long as possible. Like it or not this disease is gonna mess with our economy no matter what, because when 2 million more people die in a year, people will notice. When the number of people in the hospital goes up by 50% in a year, people are gonna notice. You can truncate that down to a shorter time frame and then let the economy rebound, or you can allow it to go on for 18 months and pile up corpses.

It won't just be 2 million people from COVID-19, by the way, it'll be those plus kids that get in car accidents that don't get the care they need. Women who are pregnant that have complications, get a double whammy there.


Here's the thing. People with way more knowledge than you are advising the administration on how to proceed, and if I were to bet I'd say Trump's inclinations are with what you want, but he's seen the projections and heard from experts and has determined this is the better course of action.

Here's the other thing, it's happening whether you like it or not so make the best of it and stop rooting for people to die.
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I feel like the people who say that have no clue how old the people around them or their parents are. 65 isn't that old.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moxley said:

If this number is accurate, I actually don't think this bodes well for a lot of people in the United States. Diabetes and hypertension are out of control here. Diabetes and hypertension is what leads to heart disease in a lot of cases.

Most older people in the United States have hypertension at bare minimum.


Not to mention all the land manatees and walruses populating the Spring Break beaches.
unmade bed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tailgate88 said:

AggieFrog said:

Wonder if that includes those whose hypertension is controlled via medication or if it doesn't matter.
My question as well.


Don't want to alarm you, so check with your doctor, but I've read that some meds (ace-inhibitors) actually make it worse. I'm on Lisinopril which controls the hell out of my BP and I'm gonna ride it out on Lisinopril. Figure my chances of catching CV are less that my chances of having a bad reaction to change in BP meds or coming off my BP meds.
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hph6203 said:

NASAg03 said:

No. Of the 2.86 million people that died last year in the US, 2.06 million were 65 and older.

Meaning that the majority of people that die from coronavirus are already going to die this year. They aren't getting extra 5 or 10 years of life.

Let that sink in.

2.06 million people aged 65+ will die this year. Sad fact of reality, but tell me why we shutting down the world to prevent the inevitable from happening this year.

Everyone dies some day, the goal is to put that off as long as possible. Like it or not this disease is gonna mess with our economy no matter what, because when 2 million more people die in a year, people will notice. When the number of people in the hospital goes up by 50% in a year, people are gonna notice. You can truncate that down to a shorter time frame and then let the economy rebound, or you can allow it to go on for 18 months and pile up corpses.

It won't just be 2 million people from COVID-19, by the way, it'll be those plus kids that get in car accidents that don't get the care they need. Women who are pregnant that have complications, get a double whammy there.


Here's the thing. People with way more knowledge than you are advising the administration on how to proceed, and if I were to bet I'd say Trump's inclinations are with what you want, but he's seen the projections and heard from experts and has determined this is the better course of action.

Here's the other thing, it's happening whether you like it or not so make the best of it and stop rooting for people to die.
"Conversely, with lockdowns of months, if not years, life largely stops, short-term and long-term consequences are entirely unknown, and billions, not just millions, of lives may be eventually at stake.

If we decide to jump off the cliff, we need some data to inform us about the rationale of such an action and the chances of landing somewhere safe."

Signed,

John P.A. Ioannidis, professor of medicine, of epidemiology and population health, of biomedical data science, and of statistics at Stanford University and co-director of Stanford's Meta-Research Innovation Center
TheAngelFlight
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/18/we-know-enough-now-to-act-decisively-against-covid-19/

This something of a rebuttal argument in the same publication, written by a Harvard expert, who, for what it is worth, says the following:

Quote:

[Ionnidis and I] spoke by phone on Tuesday, not long after his article appeared, and found that we had more in common than it appeared when I first read it.
Quote:

Ioannidis is right that the prospect of intense social distancing for months or years is one that can hardly be imagined, let alone enacted. The alternative of letting the infection spread uncontrolled is equally unimaginable. We certainly need more data. Even more than that, we need a breakthrough to make effective treatments, vaccines, or other preventive measures available at scale.

Waiting and hoping for a miracle as health systems are overrun by Covid-19 is not an option. For the short term there is no choice but to use the time we are buying with social distancing to mobilize a massive political, economic, and societal effort to find new ways to cope with this virus.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NASAg03 said:



"Conversely, with lockdowns of months, if not years, life largely stops, short-term and long-term consequences are entirely unknown, and billions, not just millions, of lives may be eventually at stake.

If we decide to jump off the cliff, we need some data to inform us about the rationale of such an action and the chances of landing somewhere safe."

Signed,

John P.A. Ioannidis, professor of medicine, of epidemiology and population health, of biomedical data science, and of statistics at Stanford University and co-director of Stanford's Meta-Research Innovation Center
I bolded "if." Ionnidis is not arguing the measures so far have gone too far. He even says they may be "bearable."

Ionnidis also is not arguing taking these measures for "months" or "years" would be too far. He's saying we don't know and asking for caution.

Both of those, seem to me, to be distinct arguments from what you're arguing---which is that we've already gone too far.
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree, and I'd love to see him write an opinion on what he would do differently, what additional "case studies" we might be able to do real-time, etc.

I'd just like to see more approaches, because what we're doing now doesn't seem like it's working, and seems like it's going to cause more harm than good. And I know others share my opinion.

We all want what's best for the world. And there will always be conflicting opinions about how to achieve that.

And even more scary: there are lie, damned lies, and statistics. We have all three at play with this pandemic.
HotardAg07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Imperial College study forecasted that if we did nothing to prevent of this virus and let it run its course then roughly 2.2mm people would have died in the US this year. That's IN ADDITION to all the other sick people who normally die and it would cause such an overloading of the medical system that people to die who could have otherwise been saved by medical intervention. 2.2MM in a year is more people that have died in a single year for any cause in our history.

Maybe you don't believe that outcome, but our elected leaders had to make a hard decision based on the data at hand and they've elected to go this way. The way president trump was talking a week ago and is talking now shows you that he's probably seem some very dire projections that has caused a change in attitude.

I just wish people wouldn't take the fact that they dont like the impact on the economy to lessen the legitimate threat of the virus.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.