NYC ER Doc: Ventilating / treating for ARDS is all wrong

12,357 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by knoxtom
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For the docs on the board, not sure if anyone saw this. Thoughts?

https://vimeo.com/402537849

Five minute video from a NYC ER doc who says treating for ARDS, etc. is wrong - that the problem is lack of O2 in the blood, and the lung issues are a symptom, not the actual problem.

He's basically begging for others to research this because his hospital admins refuse to go outside of existing standard of care.

I follow him on twitter as well and some European doctors are engaging him on this theory, but wanted to see what the board docs had to say.
New Boot Goofin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A family member mentioned this yesterday. I'm interested to hear what our resident doctors think.
lazuras_dc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Following
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This harkens back to a hypothesis I read about that the virus was hijacking red blood cells, killing their ability to carry O2 and resulting in increased ferritin.

Edit: Found it.




Evidently this was an in silica modeling, I think?
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While it's worth discussing, it should be noted he is an ER physician and his thoughts are in direct opposition to essentially every pulm/crit physician (the vent experts) I've personally discussed this with and heard speak on the matter.

His thoughts also would not explain why these people have such high PEEP requirements, a defining feature of ARDS.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My opinion. The vents are not killing pts. Rather, this is raging ARDS with cytokine storm +/- a vasculopathy or a thrombotic diasthesis. Lower inflating pressures, higher PEEPs for traditional ARDS are the only traditional treatments that effect outcomes. I have zero clue what other therapy he is recommending for severe respiratory failure other than a ventilator. The imaging, etc all support ARDS. IMO this is an emotional rant, understandably. But he's abandoning basic pulmonary physiologic tenets.
oneeyedag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's a longer take of his video with feedback from others.

https://thinkingcriticalcare.com/
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Currently the only other therapy for these severe pts is ECMO. Not feasible. Be careful how much credence you put into social media "experts". Ha including myself. But I am fairly confident I'm competent.
Necrosis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm an ER guy and I don't claim to have know the ins and outs of vents near as well the pulm crit guys but from what I've been reading there are 2 phenotypes people have been seeing. A high compliance and low compliance that resembles ARDS requiring high PEEP. Look up Salim's stuff from RebelEM if you want to look into it more.

Found the article: https://www.esicm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/684_author-proof.pdf
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HFNC not recommended for purely "hypoxic" pts due to aerosolization risks. The O2 helmets not widely available. So what else besides ETT/MV ?
combat wombat™
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That article mentions ECMO. Anybody have experience with it in these folks? I can't get a damn CT scan on them much less a trip to OR for huge ECMO VV lines. Limited resources and excessive exposures.
Necrosis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The conversation in ED circles is starting to consider the use of HFNC with surgical masks. Might not be as aerosolizing as we think.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Carnwellag2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was wondering this as well.....as it seems those that go on ventilators typically don't get off of them. they just have a prolonged life.

something to consider
Gizzards
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is a good article describing the phenotypes and recommendations in today's Medscape email blast. They reference the NYC Twitter doc, but the article refers to a German group and an article just published in a pulmonary journal. They make the case that these patients often behave differently than typical ARDS patients. They have hypoxemia with preserved lung volumes and that high PEEP is possibly damaging the lungs. As a urologist, I don't have the experience to judge this, but it is important to know that some experts in the field believe that. I can forward you the email if you like. Just PM me.
Pulmcrit_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I had started to write something in response but Marcus Aurelius has already stated my conclusion. I feel bad for this physician. I will give him the benefit of the doubt that he means well and that his emotions have got the best of him. However, he is not just abandoning the tenets of physiology, but also his charge as a physician.

One of the greatest physicians, if not greatest, was William Osler. In an essay entitled Aequanimitas, he stated that imperturbability was the greatest virtue of the physician. Given the above users name is the same, it is apropos that the essay begins with a quote from Marcus Aurelius, "Thou must be like a promontory of the sea, against which, though the waves beat continually, yet it both itself stands, and about it are those swelling waves stilled and quieted." A physician more than ever must demonstrate this quality.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
THX BRO!!! Keep the fight.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marcus Aurelius said:

HFNC not recommended for purely "hypoxic" pts due to aerosolization risks. The O2 helmets not widely available. So what else besides ETT/MV ?


My experience has been that even when HFNC is tried for these patients it generally fails. If a COVID patient is breathing 35 times a minute and saturating 88% on 6 L NC, just tube them I say. They're gonna end up there anyway it seems, the hypoxia is just so profound.

Obviously with the caveat that is from observing patient courses in the unit and not managing their oxygenation myself.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Pulmcrit_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am using high flow nasal cannula at this time in a number of patients. As above with surgical masks in place and in negative pressure room. I would like to get some type of bed isolation tent for high flow NC patients to be in as it would help with decreasing dispersion of aerosols and droplets making both our PPE and our decontamination more effective.
Pulmcrit_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think that is the case. HFNC not only oxygenates but it decreases the work of breathing, particularly as you move into the 40-60 lpm range. I have kept multiple people off the vent that otherwise would be vented with the 6 lpm and intubate rule.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good thoughts. I had a COVID ARDS survive with 100% oxymixer for ten days. Avoided the vent. I think we are all trying to avoid ETT/MV but the removal of BIPAP on these pts is a blow.
n_touch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keegan99 said:

This harkens back to a hypothesis I read about that the virus was hijacking red blood cells, killing their ability to carry O2 and resulting in increased ferritin.

Edit: Found it.




Evidently this was an in silica modeling, I think?
So if this is the case are they trying blood transfusions to help those patients?
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pulmcrit_ag said:

I don't think that is the case. HFNC not only oxygenates but it decreases the work of breathing, particularly as you move into the 40-60 lpm range. I have kept multiple people off the vent that otherwise would be vented with the 6 lpm and intubate rule.


Like I said, you two would know better than me. I've only seen three of these patients on HFNC and all three ended up intubated, but my sample size is so small that my observation is probably entirely irrelevant.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Pulmcrit_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think you need to institute HFNC early, what you are describing with the patient already in extremis is surely not going to be salvaged by it.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am going to to push our protocols for COVID pts to include HFNC with surgical masks in place.
Player To Be Named Later
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can someone explain why high A1C and blood sugar is a big risk factor?

My doc has been "monitoring" my A1C. I've never passed 7.0 but float around 6-6.5 Now I'm a bit concerned.
mustang90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meh, don't worry. Your attitude will decide your fate
aggie90
n_touch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Player To Be Named Later said:

Can someone explain why high A1C and blood sugar is a big risk factor?

My doc has been "monitoring" my A1C. I've never passed 7.0 but float around 6-6.5 Now I'm a bit concerned.
A1C can be a contributor to less oxygen in the blood but I would think it would have to be higher than that and for a longer period of time.
HotardAg07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've read into this because my father and FIL have moderately to poorly managed T2 diabetes. It seems like it just comes down to having a poor immune system and immune response.
culdeus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Player To Be Named Later said:

Can someone explain why high A1C and blood sugar is a big risk factor?

My doc has been "monitoring" my A1C. I've never passed 7.0 but float around 6-6.5 Now I'm a bit concerned.


Theory is you have fewer fresh RBC to carry O2.

Difference between 6 and 7 is nothing. There still seems scant evidence that a decent Type1 A1C is a risk factor. IANAD.

This is from perspective of a type 1 following this news.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Player To Be Named Later said:

Can someone explain why high A1C and blood sugar is a big risk factor?

My doc has been "monitoring" my A1C. I've never passed 7.0 but float around 6-6.5 Now I'm a bit concerned.
Diabetics have weaker immune systems and often have other chronic illnesses that run concurrently with that condition (such as obesity, hypertension, heart/vascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, NASH, etc.)
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
JeremiahJohnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting. This kind of solidified my feelings of symptoms. Initially it felt like it was all in my throat. I just couldn't catch my breath and coughing made it worse. Lungs issues came later. My Lungs haven't felt terrible, but I have just felt like I am not getting enough air.

Now I feel no symptoms, just exhausted. My lungs feel perfectly normal, but not getting enough air. My heart rate still spikes doing simple activities.
ham98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pulmcrit_ag said:

I am using high flow nasal cannula at this time in a number of patients. As above with surgical masks in place and in negative pressure room. I would like to get some type of bed isolation tent for high flow NC patients to be in as it would help with decreasing dispersion of aerosols and droplets making both our PPE and our decontamination more effective.
Does something like that not already exist? If not I'm pretty sure there are some engineers who read this board who could put a working design together.
n_touch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

My Lungs haven't felt terrible, but I have just felt like I am not getting enough air.
This was me in late Jan early Feb. I even cancelled a stress test because my breathing had not come back to normal. Was just noticing yesterday that my breathing was finally back to normal and I was not short of breath doing normal tasks anymore.
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marcus Aurelius said:

HFNC not recommended for purely "hypoxic" pts due to aerosolization risks. The O2 helmets not widely available. So what else besides ETT/MV ?
WHO currently recommends HFNO as a therapy for COVID-19 respiratory failure, as does the Italian Thoracic Society, the Respiratory Care Committee of the Chinese Thoracic Society, The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, and a joint statement from the German intensive care, anesthesia, and emergency medicine societies.

Simulated use of HFNO with surgical mask placed over it demonstrated lower aerosol dispersion than NC w/o a mask or other forms of oxygen delivery like venturi masks or simple masks. I think any therapy that potentially spares the use of a vent is a therapy that should be strongly considered, especially one with lower aerosolization risk like HFNO.

When we are looking at a 50-80% mortality for those that require intubation, I think we should be looking at trying to avoid reflexively intubating as much as we can. Proning these patients early when feasible, trying out HFNO for those with increased oxygen demands, practicing a bit of permissive hypoxemia as long as there is no evidence of significant end organ dysfunction. Obviously many of these patients will still end up requiring intubation, but any patient that never had to go on a vent that typically would have is a huge win especially if inundated with COVID cases.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.