Don't use a Ventilator? Virus attacks the red blood cells that carry oxygen?

6,089 Views | 16 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by BCO07
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am not sure if this random post has made it to this board yet, but this would probably be some really important info for doctors (If this is accurate)

Please read below:


Quote:

In the last 35 days, a mountain of anecdotal evidence has come out of NYC, Italy, Spain, etc. about COVID-19 and characteristics of patients who get seriously ill. It's not only piling up but now leading to a general field-level consensus backed up by a few previously little-known studies that we've had it all wrong the whole time. Well, a few had some things eerily correct (cough Trump cough), especially with Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromicin, but we'll get to that in a minute.

There is no 'pneumonia' nor ARDS. At least not the ARDS with established treatment protocols and procedures we're familiar with. Ventilators are not only the wrong solution, but high pressure intubation can actually wind up causing more damage than without, not to mention complications from tracheal scarring and ulcers given the duration of intubation often required They may still have a use in the immediate future for patients too far to bring back with this newfound knowledge, but moving forward a new treatment protocol needs to be established so we stop treating patients for the wrong disease.

The past 48 hours or so have seen a huge revelation: COVID-19 causes prolonged and progressive hypoxia (starving your body of oxygen) by binding to the heme groups in hemoglobin in your red blood cells. People are simply desaturating (losing o2 in their blood), and that's what eventually leads to organ failures that kill them, not any form of ARDS or pneumonia.

All the damage to the lungs you see in CT scans are from the release of oxidative iron from the hemes, this overwhelms the natural defenses against pulmonary oxidative stress and causes that nice, always-bilateral ground glass opacity in the lungs. Patients returning for re-hospitalization days or weeks after recovery suffering from apparent delayed post-hypoxic leukoencephalopathy strengthen the notion COVID-19 patients are suffering from hypoxia despite no signs of respiratory 'tire out' or fatigue.

Here's the breakdown of the whole process, including some ELI5-level cliff notes. Much has been simplified just to keep it digestible and layman-friendly.

Your red blood cells carry oxygen from your lungs to all your organs and the rest of your body. Red blood cells can do this thanks to hemoglobin, which is a protein consisting of four "hemes". Hemes have a special kind of iron ion, which is normally quite toxic in its free form, locked away in its center with a porphyrin acting as it's 'container'. In this way, the iron ion can be 'caged' and carried around safely by the hemoglobin, but used to bind to oxygen when it gets to your lungs.

When the red blood cell gets to the alveoli, or the little sacs in your lungs where all the gas exchange happens, that special little iron ion can flip between FE2+ and FE3+ states with electron exchange and bond to some oxygen, then it goes off on its little merry way to deliver o2 elsewhere.

Here's where COVID-19 comes in. Its glycoproteins bond to the heme, and in doing so that special and toxic oxidative iron ion is "disassociated" (released). It's basically let out of the cage and now freely roaming around on its own.

This is bad for two reasons:

1) Without the iron ion, hemoglobin can no longer bind to oxygen. Once all the hemoglobin is impaired, the red blood cell is essentially turned into a Freightliner truck cab with no trailer and no ability to store its cargo.. it is useless and just running around with COVID-19 virus attached to its porphyrin. All these useless trucks running around not delivering oxygen is what starts to lead to desaturation, or watching the patient's spo2 levels drop. It is INCORRECT to assume traditional ARDS and in doing so, you're treating the WRONG DISEASE.

Think of it a lot like carbon monoxide poisoning, in which CO is bound to the hemoglobin, making it unable to carry oxygen. In those cases, ventilators aren't treating the root cause; the patient's lungs aren't 'tiring out', they're pumping just fine. The red blood cells just can't carry o2, end of story. Only in this case, unlike CO poisoning in which eventually the CO can break off, the affected hemoglobin is permanently stripped of its ability to carry o2 because it has lost its iron ion. The body compensates for this lack of o2 carrying capacity and deliveries by having your kidneys release hormones like erythropoietin, which tell your bone marrow factories to ramp up production on new red blood cells with freshly made and fully functioning hemoglobin. This is the reason you find elevated hemoglobin and decreased blood oxygen saturation as one of the 3 primary indicators of whether the **** is about to hit the fan for a particular patient or not.

2) That little iron ion, along with millions of its friends released from other hemes, are now floating through your blood freely. As I mentioned before, this type of iron ion is highly reactive and causes oxidative damage. It turns out that this happens to a limited extent naturally in our bodies and we have cleanup & defense mechanisms to keep the balance. The lungs, in particular, have 3 primary defenses to maintain "iron homeostasis", 2 of which are in the alveoli, those little sacs in your lungs we talked about earlier. The first of the two are little macro****es that roam around and scavenge up any free radicals like this oxidative iron. The second is a lining on the walls (called the epithelial surface) which has a thin layer of fluid packed with high levels of antioxidant molecules.. things like abscorbic acid (AKA Vitamin C) among others. Well, this is usually good enough for naturally occurring rogue iron ions but with COVID-19 running rampant your body is now basically like a progressive state letting out all the prisoners out of the prisons it's just too much iron and it begins to overwhelm your lungs' countermeasures, and thus begins the process of pulmonary oxidative stress. This leads to damage and inflammation, which leads to all that nasty stuff and damage you see in CT scans of COVID-19 patient lungs. Ever noticed how it's always bilateral? (both lungs at the same time) Pneumonia rarely ever does that, but COVID-19 does EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.


Once your body is now running out of control, with all your oxygen trucks running around without any freight, and tons of this toxic form of iron floating around in your bloodstream, other defenses kick in. While your lungs are busy with all this oxidative stress they can't handle, and your organs are being starved of o2 without their constant stream of deliveries from red blood cell's hemoglobin, and your liver is attempting to do its best to remove the iron and store it in its 'iron vault'. Only its getting overwhelmed too. It's starved for oxygen and fighting a losing battle from all your hemoglobin letting its iron free, and starts crying out "help, I'm taking damage!" by releasing an enzyme called alanine aminotransferase (ALT). BOOM, there is your second of 3 primary indicators of whether the **** is about to hit the fan for a particular patient or not.


Eventually, if the patient's immune system doesn't fight off the virus in time before their blood oxygen saturation drops too low, ventilator or no ventilator, organs start shutting down. No fuel, no work. The only way to even try to keep them going is max oxygen, even a hyperbaric chamber if one is available on 100% oxygen at multiple atmospheres of pressure, just to give what's left of their functioning hemoglobin a chance to carry enough o2 to the organs and keep them alive. Yeah we don't have nearly enough of those chambers, so some fresh red blood cells with normal hemoglobin in the form of a transfusion will have to do.

The core point being, treating patients with the iron ions stripped from their hemoglobin (rendering it abnormally nonfunctional) with ventilator intubation is futile, unless you're just hoping the patient's immune system will work its magic in time. The root of the illness needs to be addressed.
Best case scenario? Treatment regimen early, before symptoms progress too far. Hydroxychloroquine (more on that in a minute, I promise) with Azithromicin has shown fantastic, albeit critics keep mentioning 'anecdotal' to describe the mountain, promise and I'll explain why it does so well next. But forget straight-up plasma with antibodies, that might work early but if the patient is too far gone they'll need more. They'll need all the blood: antibodies and red blood cells. No help in sending over a detachment of ammunition to a soldier already unconscious and bleeding out on the battlefield, you need to send that ammo along with some hemoglobin-stimulant-magic so that he can wake up and fire those shots at the enemy.


The story with Hydroxychloroquine

All that hilariously misguided and counterproductive criticism the media piled on chloroquine (purely for political reasons) as a viable treatment will now go down as the biggest Fake News blunder to rule them all. The media actively engaged their activism to fight 'bad orange man' at the cost of thousands of lives. Shame on them.

How does chloroquine work? Same way as it does for malaria. You see, malaria is this little parasite that enters the red blood cells and starts eating hemoglobin as its food source. The reason chloroquine works for malaria is the same reason it works for COVID-19 while not fully understood, it is suspected to bind to DNA and interfere with the ability to work magic on hemoglobin. The same mechanism that stops malaria from getting its hands on hemoglobin and gobbling it up seems to do the same to COVID-19 (essentially little snippets of DNA in an envelope) from binding to it. On top of that, Hydroxychloroquine (an advanced descendant of regular old chloroquine) lowers the pH which can interfere with the replication of the virus. Again, while the full details are not known, the entire premise of this potentially 'game changing' treatment is to prevent hemoglobin from being interfered with, whether due to malaria or COVID-19.

No longer can the media and armchair pseudo-physicians sit in their little ivory towers, proclaiming "DUR so stoopid, malaria is bacteria, COVID-19 is virus, anti-bacteria drug no work on virus!". They never got the memo that a drug doesn't need to directly act on the pathogen to be effective. Sometimes it's enough just to stop it from doing what it does to hemoglobin, regardless of the means it uses to do so.

Anyway, enough of the rant. What's the end result here? First, the ventilator emergency needs to be re-examined. If you're putting a patient on a ventilator because they're going into a coma and need mechanical breathing to stay alive, okay we get it. Give 'em time for their immune systems to pull through. But if they're conscious, alert, compliant keep them on O2. Max it if you have to. If you HAVE to inevitably ventilate, do it at low pressure but max O2. Don't tear up their lungs with max PEEP, you're doing more harm to the patient because you're treating the wrong disease.

Ideally, some form of treatment needs to happen to:

Inhibit viral growth and replication. Here plays CHQ+ZPAK+ZINC or other retroviral therapies being studies. Less virus, less hemoglobin losing its iron, less severity and damage.

Therapies used for anyone with abnormal hemoglobin or malfunctioning red blood cells. Blood transfusions. Whatever, I don't know the full breadth and scope because I'm not a physician. But think along those lines, and treat the real disease. If you're thinking about giving them plasma with antibodies, maybe if they're already in bad shape think again and give them BLOOD with antibodies, or at least blood followed by plasma with antibodies.

Now that we know more about how this virus works and affects our bodies, a whole range of options should open up.

Don't trust China. China is ASSHOE. (disclaimer: not talking about the people, just talking about the regime). They covered this up and have caused all kinds of death and carnage, both literal and economic. The ripples of this pandemic will be felt for decades.

SportAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have seen this posted in multiple places. The author admits to not being a doctor and provides no additional information that would qualify him/her as an authority on this topic. I would be quite skeptical of this information until it is confirmed by multiple authorities on the subject.
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds interesting and plausible. Hope this is being studied enough in the short term to make a difference.

I mean there are too many examples of this treatment working, and working fast. How docurrent doctors know that combo of drugs to use? Is this all from that initial Australian study (I think that was the initial study pointing at hydrochloriquin)?
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where is this linked from and who is the author?
SportAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was originally posted on medium. They took it down and most links to it are to the internet archive.

http://web.archive.org/web/20200405061401/https://medium.com/@agaiziunas/covid-19-had-us-all-fooled-but-now-we-might-have-finally-found-its-secret-91182386efcb
SportAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here's a link with more info about the article's author.

https://www.smalldeadanimals.com/index.php/2020/04/05/wuhan-flu-21/
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SportAggie said:

I have seen this posted in multiple places. The author admits to not being a doctor and provides no additional information that would qualify him/her as an authority on this topic. I would be quite skeptical of this information until it is confirmed by multiple authorities on the subject.
I am skeptical as well. But, I thought it would be good to bring this to the experts on this forum for a look...
culdeus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TurkeyBaconLeg said:

SportAggie said:

I have seen this posted in multiple places. The author admits to not being a doctor and provides no additional information that would qualify him/her as an authority on this topic. I would be quite skeptical of this information until it is confirmed by multiple authorities on the subject.
I am skeptical as well. But, I thought it would be good to bring this to the experts on this forum for a look...


It's covered in the hcq thread I believe.

Some people really latched on to hcq for reasons that simply aren't clear. The more the west looks at it the more it's efficacy fades.
bay fan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
TurkeyBaconLeg said:

SportAggie said:

I have seen this posted in multiple places. The author admits to not being a doctor and provides no additional information that would qualify him/her as an authority on this topic. I would be quite skeptical of this information until it is confirmed by multiple authorities on the subject.
I am skeptical as well. But, I thought it would be good to bring this to the experts on this forum for a look...
The "experts" likely don't waste time on the opinion Someone without the qualifications they have or experience truly treating the virus.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MedCram did a video on this yesterday.

Po2 (free oxygen in the blood vessels) drops when the lungs can't perfuse across the alveoli. Spo2 (the amount of oxygen carried on the blood cells) drops when the blood cells are not getting oxygenated. If there were an issue with the blood cells not being able to carry oxygen while the lung tissue was still able to perfuse, one would expect to see a drop in spo2 without a relational drop in po2.

lunchbox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Days ago, I watched a replay of a zoom meeting of various Drs from around the country and their experiences fighting COVID-19.

One of them said basically the exact same things from the article above. He said he is starting to think ventilators do more harm than good and should only be used when absolutely necessary, lowest PEEP possible, etc.

I'll see if I can find it but it was at the end of a rabbit hole.
Marcus Aurelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guys I've posted about this on numerous threads. These people are severely hypoxic. As in dissolved PO2 (not O2 bound to Hgb). HgB injury doesn't drop PO2. If this was a hemoglobinopathy - the O2 sats (O2 bound to HgB %) would be low and discordant to the PO2. You don't see this pattern, Basic pulmonary O2 HgB saturation curve physiology.
lunchbox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lunchbox said:

Days ago, I watched a replay of a zoom meeting of various Drs from around the country and their experiences fighting COVID-19.

One of them said basically the exact same things from the article above. He said he is starting to think ventilators do more harm than good and should only be used when absolutely necessary, lowest PEEP possible, etc.

I'll see if I can find it but it was at the end of a rabbit hole.
Found it! Watch the video in the page below....the Dr I was referring to starts talking just after the 1 hour mark if you want to skip ahead.

https://www.acmt.net/ARBs_NSAIDS_Remdesivir_Updates_from_the_Front_Lines.html
Dr. Maturin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marcus Aurelius said:

Guys I've posted about this on numerous threads. These people are severely hypoxic. As in dissolved PO2 (not O2 bound to Hgb). HgB injury doesn't drop PO2. If this was a hemoglobinopathy - the O2 sats (O2 bound to HgB %) would be low and discordant to the PO2. You don't see this pattern, Basic pulmonary O2 HgB saturation curve physiology.
could you bring this down a couple of notches in common vernacular. I take it you are disputing the post above?
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Moxley said:

MedCram did a video on this yesterday.

Po2 (free oxygen in the blood vessels) drops when the lungs can't perfuse across the alveoli. Spo2 (the amount of oxygen carried on the blood cells) drops when the blood cells are not getting oxygenated. If there were an issue with the blood cells not being able to carry oxygen while the lung tissue was still able to perfuse, one would expect to see a drop in spo2 without a relational drop in po2.




What if there is significant peripheral damage to the lungs due to the free iron from the hemoglobin, which I thought is what the above article is suggesting?
Fitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another piece by the Times:


More so than the subject of intubation what's really made apparent is how challenging it is to treat the seemingly random different presentations of this disease and react to all of it on the fly without prior studies to reference back on.
Ranger222
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Maturin said:

Marcus Aurelius said:

Guys I've posted about this on numerous threads. These people are severely hypoxic. As in dissolved PO2 (not O2 bound to Hgb). HgB injury doesn't drop PO2. If this was a hemoglobinopathy - the O2 sats (O2 bound to HgB %) would be low and discordant to the PO2. You don't see this pattern, Basic pulmonary O2 HgB saturation curve physiology.
could you bring this down a couple of notches in common vernacular. I take it you are disputing the post above?

He's saying you're not seeing what they are proposing in patient numbers. You'd be seeing something different if the virus attacked red blood cells.

That original analysis was an in silico analysis -- meaning just a prediction by a computer, no experimental validation which is usually required. It is fine for hypothesis development, but that hypothesis does not seem to be true if you go by patient symptoms.

Its was exciting at the time, but you have to realize you can program a computer model to do anything you want, specifically for that type of research. That preprint was never published with peer review and that is a good reason why.
BCO07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Maturin said:

Marcus Aurelius said:

Guys I've posted about this on numerous threads. These people are severely hypoxic. As in dissolved PO2 (not O2 bound to Hgb). HgB injury doesn't drop PO2. If this was a hemoglobinopathy - the O2 sats (O2 bound to HgB %) would be low and discordant to the PO2. You don't see this pattern, Basic pulmonary O2 HgB saturation curve physiology.
could you bring this down a couple of notches in common vernacular. I take it you are disputing the post above?
Bottom line, the info presented in the OP is not consistent with the clinical picture
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.