The issue in question is in non outbreak counties where the disease is under control (not eradicated), how likely is any one citizen to be both asymptomatic and shedding the virus? Comanche County or Brazos County are very different from Harris County or NYC where population density makes this more likely.
The thoughtful answer to the mask/no mask question is to allow state and local leadership to provide guidance based on disease incidence in each county. Blanket mandates that everyone should wear a mask isn't logical, regardless of whether it makes people "feel" safe. Thousands of people are required to wear masks at all times in public for months/years in more rural or less population dense locations just in case 0.05% (or whatever the actual number is) of the population is an asymptomatic shedder? It's the classic individual liberty vs public health debate. If you live in NYC, ride the subways, fly in planes, etc you should probably wear a mask. A family at the DQ in Goldthwaite TX, probably not necessary.
Moreover, the first paper suggesting asymptomatic shedding was a significant contributor to viral spread was corrected and the authors acknowledged that they never interviewed the index case to confirm he/she wasn't symptomatic. Follow up interviews confirmed the individual was symptomatic. They apologized for this oversight. I believe there was a thread on this board on this subject. FWIW, the WHO doesn't recommend masks for everyone, nor do some of the countries affected by this pandemic.
My employer requires us to wear masks, so I do what they ask because it's not illegal or unethical to comply wi to my employers wishes. They ask me to do many things that make no sense. Doesn't mean it's the correct decision or that I have to agree with it though.