Harvard School of Public Health Professors: Reopen Schools

2,614 Views | 15 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by oragator
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/07/20/opinion/listen-science-reopen-schools/

Quote:

President Trump recently took to Twitter to demand that the country's schools reopen in the fall. He has framed the conversation as one that pits fear-mongering Democrats opposed to in-person schooling against Republicans committed to reopening the economy. As public health professionals and parents of school-age children, we urge the country: Ignore Trump.

Instead, listen to the science, which says that schools can and should reopen for in-person learning with appropriate risk reduction strategies, while officials also implement aggressive steps to keep community transmission low.

...

Prolonged time away from schools has led to months of lost learning and widened gaps in educational achievement, especially for some students of color and those in lower income households. Adding months more to this toll will be an educational disaster that some children may never recover from. School closures also threaten some children's safety, due to increased child neglect, hurt children's mental health, and keep many from getting enough to eat.

The harms of school closure are clear. What about the risks of reopening?

Multiple studies show that children are not only less likely to become seriously ill from COVID-19, they are also only half as likely to get infected in the first place. Overall, the rate of infection requiring hospitalization among US school-age children (5 to 17) since the beginning of the pandemic though July 4 was roughly 1 in 20,000.

What about the risk to teachers and staff? Again, listen to the science. A report led by the former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under President Obama concluded that children appear less likely than adults to transmit COVID-19 to others unlike other viruses like influenza though this evidence is still limited and preliminary. Studies examining schools with known cases of COVID-19 have shown low transmission rates for instance, in one case, just two students and no teachers infected out of 863 close contacts. Others show zero confirmed infections even among teachers and students who sat in the same classroom with a symptomatic child.

...

74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's a new study out that updates what has been learned about kids and the virus: Infectious
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Already discussed.

Britain's top pediatrician dissects it here:



Key bit:

amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The problem is that the whole reopening has been backasswards. Schools should have been the number 1 priority since they are the most important, the lowest risk, and vital for parents to get back to work.

Everything else should have been opened after that.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
boy am I glad they didn't wait for public schools to open before they allowed people to participate in expanded economic activity

I'd be certainly out of a job by now in that case
Bluecat_Aggie94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's got nothing to do with the health of the kids. The teachers are the ones driving the schools conversation (and faculty at university)

aggiebrad94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Poor Harvard with the most backhanded, "Trump was right," in history.
cavscout96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mostly, Harvard doesn't want a larger homeschool population.

Harder to indoctrinate young minds when they are not corraled for 9 hours a day at government thought control camps.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
amercer said:

The problem is that the whole reopening has been backasswards. Schools should have been the number 1 priority since they are the most important, the lowest risk, and vital for parents to get back to work.

Everything else should have been opened after that.



This isn't economically feasible
CowtownEng
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leather Tuscadero said:

amercer said:

The problem is that the whole reopening has been backasswards. Schools should have been the number 1 priority since they are the most important, the lowest risk, and vital for parents to get back to work.

Everything else should have been opened after that.



This isn't economically feasible


?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cavscout96 said:

Mostly, Harvard doesn't want a larger homeschool population.

Harder to indoctrinate young minds when they are not corraled for 9 hours a day at government thought control camps.


And I believe it was a professor at Harvard who recently ridiculed home schooling. They absolutely don't want this to happen.

Also, a plea to ignore Trump with simultaneous plea to do exactly what he says. They made needs masks so as not to spread their TDS.
wreckncrew
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was Harvard professor. They were supposed to have a homeschool summit but only invited people against homeschooling to their conference.

Apparently they know more about raising my kids than I do.
cavscout96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wreckncrew said:

It was Harvard professor. They were supposed to have a homeschool summit but only invited people against homeschooling to their conference.

Apparently they know more about raising my kids than I do.
yes, that was pretty much the gist of the paper, and hence, the desire to get students back into the institutions where they can be indoctrinated.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cone said:

boy am I glad they didn't wait for public schools to open before they allowed people to participate in expanded economic activity

I'd be certainly out of a job by now in that case


Well, the economy is about to be shut down again, and we won't be having kids in school.
cavscout96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
amercer said:

cone said:

boy am I glad they didn't wait for public schools to open before they allowed people to participate in expanded economic activity

I'd be certainly out of a job by now in that case


Well, the economy is about to be shut down again, and we won't be having kids in school.
unlikely
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lol no it's not
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you read the links in the article, it makes the point many have made, you can and should open schools, but only if you do all the things we aren't doing. It specifically says you have to keep the Covid rate low (which we aren't in many places) by keeping gyms and bars and other high risk places closed (which we aren't). Have robust contact tracing (which we aren't), etc.
They are also making the argument from a "closings are harmful for development" point of view which absolutely has merit. But even they say the some of the studies on kids transmission rates are inconclusive,so to open is an additional risk we need to be prepared for.

I would also say I applaud them for going against orthodoxy to lay out a point of view that is based on facts and honesty where this is still a question. More stuff like this on both sides will help us get to good solutions and not politically driven ones,
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.