Will be hard for countries like South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Japan all had slightly different approaches, but all so far have resulted in 100x less deaths per capita than Sweden and in many cases have far higher population density and proximity to China that Sweden has. Many of those countries have resumed a much higher level of normalcy than than US has, including in some cases soccer games with full stadiums.
A country like Japan has much more density and much older population than the US or Sweden and avoided large scale shutdowns, yet still has 100x less deaths due to a superior population level response of mask wearing, sanitation, and targeted focus on preventing super spreader areas and elderly. Japan did close school for about a month, but they have been going back regularly since then while -- wearing masks mind you. I don't understand why people haven't been pointing to Japan as the model country versus Sweden if you're trying to argue for a more hands-off approach.
My personal theory is that the population behavior response is more important than government policy in avoiding the virus - obviously there are other factors such as location (pop density, climate, etc) and health care (detection, tracing, treatment, etc.) that probably play more of a factor than government policy as well.
If I've learned anything, it's that nobody comes here to change their opinion on something, so I'm not sure why I keep posting stuff like this. The singular focus on Sweden's response versus the rest of the world has been very strange to me, given the broad array of different responses and different results that are more interesting to investigate.