Assuming Herd Immunity is at low percentage, how does...

2,537 Views | 16 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Capitol Ag
HIT TO KILL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does it play out? By that I mean, that I have some questions about starting back up. I am not sure I understand how the herd works.

1. I supposed that if COVID-19 came into the NBA bubble, then they all might get COVID while the surrounding area was immune.
2. Tech companies With large populations, where the people officed at home and had little exposure, if they open the office, will that population need to work toward 20% infection rate?
3. Rule America - this one I assume there will be little outbreaks in places without 20% until the data saturates.

Curious, if people have an understanding of the micro portions of herd immunity.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden/

Sweden is already there.
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Herd immunity does not mean there will be no new infections.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Correct
RandyAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But you have to have infections (or a safe, effective vaccine) to reach herd immunity, so hiding inside only kicks the can down the road and delays the inevitable.
Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RandyAg98 said:

But you have to have infections (or a safe, effective vaccine) to reach herd immunity, so hiding inside only kicks the can down the road and delays the inevitable.
How I see it as well, unless someone can explain how this is not the case...
HIT TO KILL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But, if you want to open up, then you have to understand what can happen so you know if you have a problem. It seems to me that Herd Immunity is a Macro concept. From where we are now, you have to understand the Micro potentials to make sure things play out. Baseball is shutting down again, when perhaps, these events resolve their "community herd immunity." Starting up the universities, I expect to see some COVID spike, but if you could understand the population mix, you might be able to predict the amount of spike and how fast it resolves. Then you could capture the risk and determine if things are out of control or not.
Complete Idiot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Capitol Ag said:

RandyAg98 said:

But you have to have infections (or a safe, effective vaccine) to reach herd immunity, so hiding inside only kicks the can down the road and delays the inevitable.
How I see it as well, unless someone can explain how this is not the case...


If a group/region can tolerate a lock down long enough, they could in theory last until a vaccine is available or perhaps the virus mutates into something less impactful to humans. Vaccine seems more likely but there is no guarantee.
BiochemAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HIT TO KILL said:

Does it play out? By that I mean, that I have some questions about starting back up. I am not sure I understand how the herd works.

1. I supposed that if COVID-19 came into the NBA bubble, then they all might get COVID while the surrounding area was immune.
2. Tech companies With large populations, where the people officed at home and had little exposure, if they open the office, will that population need to work toward 20% infection rate?
3. Rule America - this one I assume there will be little outbreaks in places without 20% until the data saturates.

Curious, if people have an understanding of the micro portions of herd immunity.

Herd immunity doesn't mean there are no more infections. Herd immunity means the spread of any infection is limited and slowed. So, yes, isolated and COVID free population is still vulnerable if they are together and someone brings it into the population.

We generally have herd immunity to things like measles due to vaccinations. However, we still have small outbreaks which can become significant in populations that have a high prevalence of anti vaccination.

A vulnerable person will always be at risk of catching it if they are exposed to an infected person but the likelihood of being exposed becomes very small if there are few infected people. And at herd immunity levels, R<1 so it doesn't spread very far.


This virus is/will be endemic. It will always be with us and continue to circulate in the population like the flu virus or cold viruses. The best solution is to limit spread when it does pop up.

As a side note, limiting spread by lockdown has proven to occur too slowly to meaningfully prevent an COVID outbreak. You can't anticipate when it will happen so you can't mandate a lockdown at the start of an COVID outbreak. You can only react when you see an increase, which is too slow.
Agsrback12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot of the NBAers already got it before we hit the panic button.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agsrback12 said:

A lot of the NBAers already got it before so we hit the panic button.

Fify
AgsMyDude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The "hiding inside" was to slow the spread, not stop it entirely. It gave the medical professionals more time to learn and improve treatment.

Remember back on Feb when the major worry was ventilators then we found out it did more harm than good and should only be used as a last resort?
Spaulding
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And to get the stockpiles of ppe to an adequate level
deadbq03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgsMyDude said:

The "hiding inside" was to slow the spread, not stop it entirely. It gave the medical professionals more time to learn and improve treatment.

Remember back on Feb when the major worry was ventilators then we found out it did more harm than good and should only be used as a last resort?
This is exactly the point of "flattening the curve." That term always implied that you're stretching it out longer, but it's easier for hospitals to handle a lower rate of new patients than a deluge. I use that term because it's a similar concept to flooding... If you get 20inches of rain across two weeks, you're going to be fine. If you get 20 inches of rain in one day, you're screwed.

The point of slowing the spread is to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed at any point. That's the societal risk. If hospitals are overwhelmed, then all other normal activity that might cause harm becomes a lot more risky. If you get in a car accident and the hospital is overwhelmed with Covid cases, your level of care just dropped.

That's the main reason this is a big deal.
deadbq03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spaulding said:

And to get the stockpiles of ppe to an adequate level
It's a travesty we didn't already have a stockpile of PPE and testing materials.
RandyAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was in March. What is the point now?
anaggieshusband
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It should be better in 2 weeks
Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Complete Idiot said:

Capitol Ag said:

RandyAg98 said:

But you have to have infections (or a safe, effective vaccine) to reach herd immunity, so hiding inside only kicks the can down the road and delays the inevitable.
How I see it as well, unless someone can explain how this is not the case...


If a group/region can tolerate a lock down long enough, they could in theory last until a vaccine is available or perhaps the virus mutates into something less impactful to humans. Vaccine seems more likely but there is no guarantee.


Hopefully we won't tolerate that.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.