UK: Not a single child hospitalized since schools reopened in June

3,306 Views | 19 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by DadHammer
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Schools reopening in June did not lead to a single child being hospitalised with Covid-19, new figures from Public Health England show.

The data reveals that despite more than 1.6 million youngsters returning to education, just 70 children tested positive for the virus, and none needed hospital treatment.


In contrast, 128 staff members were diagnosed with the virus, and PHE said most of the transmission had come from adults. Schools have been told to improve their hygiene to prevent outbreaks.

The research also shows that cases were far more likely to happen in areas which were experiencing high levels of the virus, suggesting that high levels of community infection were responsible for the outbreaks.

The analysis also said further school closures may be necessary in regions with increasing community infection but this should "be considered only in extremis".

Report author, Dr Shamez Ladhani, clinical epidemiologist, Public Health England, said: "SARS-Cov2 infections and outbreaks were uncommon in educational settings during the first month after the easing of national lockdown in England.

"The strong correlation with regional SARS-Cov-2 incidence emphasises the importance of controlling community transmission to protect educational settings.

"Additional interventions should focus on reducing transmission in and among staff members."

The report also showed that there were 30 outbreaks in schools where at least two people were infected. In those cases there were just six incidents of pupils passing the infection to staff and just two of students passing it between themselves.

Many of the children were asymptomatic and of the 30 single cases, most had caught the virus from household contacts.

The report suggests that just 0.01 per cent schools had a case or outbreak in June, and concludes that infections in education settings are rare.

Over the same period, there were 25,470 cases recorded in England as a whole, meaning that schools contributed to just 0.7 per cent of cases, and children just 0.27 per cent.

Although staff members were more likely to be infected than children, they were no more likely than the general population.


On Sunday, Britain's chief medical officers warned that despite coronavirus children are more at risk of long-term harm if they do not attend school than if they return to the classroom.

In a joint statement issued ahead of the reopening of schools next month, the advisers said children have an "exceptionally low risk of dying" from Covid-19.

They said "very few, if any" children and teenagers would come to long-term harm from the virus solely by attending school, while there was a 'certainty' of harm from not returning.

The chief and deputy chief medical officers said schools were not a "common route of transmission", and that teachers were not at any increased risk of dying compared to the general working-age population.

...


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/08/23/reopening-schools-june-not-single-child-hospitalised-coronavirus/
Newoldarmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great news. My high school kids go back tomorrow and the kinder kid started last week.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wonder what the UK will report for HS and college aged students.
Genuinely curious.
Aggie95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
70 kids across the UK?

We have that many in GA alone.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"The strong correlation with regional SARS-Cov-2 incidence emphasises the importance of controlling community transmission to protect educational settings."

That's the key bit right there.
terradactylexpress
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You also have had more cases in GA than the UK during that time period.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie95 said:

70 kids across the UK?

We have that many in GA alone.

70 out of 1.6 million. That's 0.0043% with 0.00 hospitalizations.

What's your point?
Aggie95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
seems crazy low. I would assume it would be higher than that.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Newoldarmy said:

Great news. My high school kids go back tomorrow and the kinder kid started last week.
For some reason that user name really checked out to me.
puryear94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is the age range for the British kids in the story? Is it 5-18 or is it 5-12? That could make a big difference. The only news stories I can find about US elementaries closing is due to staff, not children, being infected. It's a different story in high schools.
terradactylexpress
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie95 said:

seems crazy low. I would assume it would be higher than that.
From June 1 - today the UK has reported a grand total of 49,310 new cases out of potentially 66M people (I don't know the boundaries of the reported study so that might not be the right number if it excluded Ireland etc).

So potentially as low as 75 cases per 100,000.

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/cases



Georgia has had 207,330 cases in the same time frame. or approx 1,952 cases per 100k (10.62M pop)

https://dph.georgia.gov/covid-19-daily-status-report



Texas has had 512,657 (1,767/100k)

https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83


It's crazy low because there is a lack of community spread within the UK vs anywhere in the US
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Encouraging data
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keegan99 said:

Although staff members were more likely to be infected than children, they were no more likely than the general population.
This is the most important sentence
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A couple more thoughts on the U.K. Here is an article from the BBC today where their chief medical officer said that missing school was more dangerous for kids than the virus:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53875410

First, it's nice to see a country where the people seem to have some faith in the political and scientific leadership. Ironically it's a country that spent the last few years ripping itself apart over an existential political question.

Second they are prioritizing opening schools, and are willing to keep other restrictions in place to make it happen. As others have pointed out above, it's a lot easier to open schools up when community transmission is low. The economy will never recover until schools are open, but we didn't make it a priority in this country. Instead we opened a bunch of other less critical stuff up.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Time to open this up.. no reason to keep even one school closed ... end the madness let's get back to living
knoxtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 school districts opened in Colorado Springs last wednesday. So far 4 of the schools have closed for covid and another in Pueblo. Principle got it, 3 students got it, haven't said who got it at the last school. Given the quick spread in schools here, I have a hard time believing this article.

We decided not to let our kid go back, and instead we are doing a remote learning program for him.

Biggest reason for this is not the fear he will get it (we are all going to get it some day), its the probability that the school will have repeated closings and reopenings, over and over again. A nine year old needs structure and the same program every day.

Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knoxtom said:

4 school districts opened in Colorado Springs last wednesday. So far 4 of the schools have closed for covid and another in Pueblo. Principle got it, 3 students got it, haven't said who got it at the last school. Given the quick spread in schools here, I have a hard time believing this article.

We decided not to let our kid go back, and instead we are doing a remote learning program for him.

Biggest reason for this is not the fear he will get it (we are all going to get it some day), its the probability that the school will have repeated closings and reopenings, over and over again. A nine year old needs structure and the same program every day.



This sounds like there may be a procedural issue for that school district.
If schools or community places are going to close over 1 student or staff testing positive for COVID, it's going to not last two weeks. And if 2 students get it, it sounds like just two people in a school will cause a two week closure?

I'd say given those parameters, you made the right call on the remote learning option as that the district is going to have repeated closings and reopenings, and that was completely predictable from the start.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The over reacting to covid is getting really old.

Schools need to stay open.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From what I have seen 4 people at Wylie schools tested positive and they did not recommend for anyone else to quarantine. A week later and no releases from the schools of any other additional cases.
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DadHammer said:

The over reacting to covid is getting really old.
Its like a game thread became reality we're all living inside of it
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tysker said:

DadHammer said:

The over reacting to covid is getting really old.
Its like a game thread became reality we're all living inside of it
Funny, but sadly true.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.