Hiroshima University found positive COVID 19 treatment results

2,691 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Leggo My Elko
Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-09-proof-safer-uv-effectively-virus.html
c-jags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Hiroshima
i debated an atomic joke here, but decided it was too soon.
AggieBiker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
c-jags said:

Quote:

Hiroshima
i debated an atomic joke here, but decided it was too soon.
Good thinking. You wouldn't want people going all nuclear on you.
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
c-jags said:

Quote:

Hiroshima
i debated an atomic joke here, but decided it was too soon.


Meh. Joke probably would've bombed.
goodAg80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/en/news/60119

Quote:

study conducted by Hiroshima University researchers found that using Ultraviolet C light with a wavelength of 222 nanometers which is safer to use around humans effectively kills SARS-CoV-2 the first research in the world to prove its efficacy against the virus that causes COVID-19.
Other studies involving 222 nm UVC, also known as Far-UVC, have so far only looked at its potency in eradicating seasonal coronaviruses that are structurally similar to the SARS-CoV-2 but not on the COVID-19-causing virus itself. A nanometer is equivalent to one billionth of a meter.
An in vitro experiment by HU researchers showed that 99.7% of the SARS-CoV-2 viral culture was killed after a 30-second exposure to 222 nm UVC irradiation at 0.1 mW/cm2. The study is published in the American Journal of Infection Control.
Tests were conducted using Ushio's Care222TM krypton-chloride excimer lamp. A 100 microliter solution containing the virus (ca. 5 106 TCID50/mL) was spread onto a 9-centimeter sterile polystyrene plate. The researchers allowed it to dry in a biosafety cabinet at room temperature before placing the Far-UVC lamp 24 centimeters above the surface of the plates.
222 nm vs 254 nm UVC
A wavelength of 222 nm UVC cannot penetrate the outer, non-living layer of the human eye and skin so it won't cause harm to the living cells beneath. This makes it a safer but equally potent alternative to the more damaging 254 nm UVC germicidal lamps increasingly used in disinfecting healthcare facilities.
Since 254 nm UVC harms exposed human tissues, it can only be used to sanitize empty rooms. But 222 nm UVC can be a promising disinfection system for occupied public spaces including hospitals where nosocomial infections are a possibility.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DrEvazanPhD said:

c-jags said:

Quote:

Hiroshima
i debated an atomic joke here, but decided it was too soon.


Meh. Joke probably would've bombed.

Sick burn!
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
c-jags said:

Quote:

Hiroshima
i debated an atomic joke here, but decided it was too soon.
poor taste. You're acting like a Little Boy.
KlinkerAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Better to be a little boy than a fat man.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KlinkerAg11 said:

Better to be a little boy than a fat man.

A fat man can order drinks.....like say, a Manhattan.











You have my permission to commence with the boos.
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
c-jags said:

Quote:

Hiroshima
i debated an atomic joke here, but decided it was too soon.
probably would have bombed anyways
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
c-jags said:

Quote:

Hiroshima
i debated an atomic joke here, but decided it was too soon.
Beware of the fallout.
Leggo My Elko
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One of the better thread derailments I've seen in awhile.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.