Considering that article is basically summarizing what the WHO said, I'm curious as to what in particular you are skeptical about?RockOn said:
Its hard to believe anything that comes from ZeroHedge.
What started as a critical financial blog in 2009 has morphed into a fear-inducing clickbait farm.
I'm more skeptical of the WHO (which is a CCP puppet) than ZeroHedge, frankly. Still, this sounds good as it's tough for the former to really use it to spread fear;96ags said:Considering that article is basically summarizing what the WHO said, I'm curious as to what in particular you are skeptical about?RockOn said:
Its hard to believe anything that comes from ZeroHedge.
What started as a critical financial blog in 2009 has morphed into a fear-inducing clickbait farm.
Quote:
The global population is roughly 7.8 billion people, if 10% have been infected that is 780 million cases. The global death toll currently attributed to Sars-Cov-2 infections is 1,061,539.
That's an infection fatality rate of roughly or 0.14%.
Right in line with seasonal flu and the predictions of many experts from all around the world.
0.14% is over 24 times LOWER than the WHO's "provisional figure" of 3.4% back in March. This figure was used in the models which were used to justify lockdowns and other draconian policies.
In fact, given the over-reporting of alleged Covid deaths, the IFR is likely even lower than 0.14%, and could show Covid to be much less dangerous than flu.
