Coworker and husband on round 2

2,796 Views | 13 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by borski99
borski99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They originally contracted the virus in France during spring break. Both 50, recovered fine.

Last Thursday night they were exposed, and their symptoms started over the weekend. So far just a mild cold. Not sure if the test was PCR (probably not due to timeframe, right?).

CDC says recurrence is rare, but interesting that both of them got it.

Could it be a different strain?


Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or a false positive either in March or now. Though, it's illogical they would BOTH have false scores. Shows it can happen potentially and why getting the vaccine even if you've had it is a very good idea.
Post removed:
by user
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoupNazi2001 said:

Capitol Ag said:

Or a false positive either in March or now. Though, it's illogical they would BOTH have false scores. Shows it can happen potentially and why getting the vaccine even if you've had it is a very good idea.


I think the assumption that the vaccine will cover all these new strains and mutations is incorrect.
Why would you think this? Why do you think these mutations are all that different?
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only way to definitely prove that someone has been reinfected in the short term is by confirming a different strain. That's why everyone was talking about different strains and reinfection months ago. If your infections are 9 months apart, then which strain it is likely doesn't matter. And as far I can tell people get immunity to all known strains.

So one of two things could be happening. First, it is possible that you had immunity and your immunity waned and lasted less than 9 months. Then you were reexposed and reinfected. We don't know they duration of immunity, but we think the immune response is less robust for mild cases and may not last as long. Second, you may have fought it off but never developed long term immunity. There seems to be some small amount of people that have this happen and get reinfected fairly quickly. This would be similar to getting the vaccine and being in the 5% that doesn't become immune.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
4133
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did either or both have a positive PCR test in March?

Are either or both waiting on a current PCR result?
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or they could just have a common cold.
borski99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In March - positive PCR. All 4 of the family got it, with many symptoms, taste/smell, etc. Their 25ish YO daughter went to ER for O2, pneumonia diagnosis. So about as clear as you can get.

Now - probably a rapid positive, but they were in close contact with a known positive last week, so we'll see. Will update when I know more.

bay fan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
ORAggieFan said:

SoupNazi2001 said:

Capitol Ag said:

Or a false positive either in March or now. Though, it's illogical they would BOTH have false scores. Shows it can happen potentially and why getting the vaccine even if you've had it is a very good idea.


I think the assumption that the vaccine will cover all these new strains and mutations is incorrect.
Why would you think this? Why do you think these mutations are all that different?
The flu vaccine changes every year due to strains so it is a logical conclusion, not necessarily right but logical to consider.
DFWTLR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That seems pretty quick for symptoms to start, thursday night exposure and symptoms 2-3 days later?
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bay fan said:

ORAggieFan said:

SoupNazi2001 said:

Capitol Ag said:

Or a false positive either in March or now. Though, it's illogical they would BOTH have false scores. Shows it can happen potentially and why getting the vaccine even if you've had it is a very good idea.


I think the assumption that the vaccine will cover all these new strains and mutations is incorrect.
Why would you think this? Why do you think these mutations are all that different?
The flu vaccine changes every year due to strains so it is a logical conclusion, not necessarily right but logical to consider.
No, that is not logical. There are multiple influenza viruses, just like there are multiple corona viruses. The flu vaccine targets those strains they predict will be hitting.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
not sure why reinfections wouldn't be expected nine months later, especially while we're still in epidemic spread

only major concern is if there's a legit connection that second positives are more virulent. but that wouldn't really fit with how these things generally work.

if we knock this thing down out of epidemic with a vaccine, I would imagine reinfections would be even more rare and completely unremarkable.

this thing is going to become the common cold after enough of us have trained our systems to react appropriately to it.
4133
How long do you want to ignore this user?
borski99 said:

In March - positive PCR. All 4 of the family got it, with many symptoms, taste/smell, etc. Their 25ish YO daughter went to ER for O2, pneumonia diagnosis. So about as clear as you can get.

Now - probably a rapid positive, but they were in close contact with a known positive last week, so we'll see. Will update when I know more.


What does "probably" a rapid positive mean? Did they take rapid tests or not? Are they currently waiting on PCR results?
jopatura
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Definitely possible. The cases of confirmed reinfection that were in the media were travelers. It wouldn't necessarily surprise me.
borski99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4133 said:

borski99 said:

In March - positive PCR. All 4 of the family got it, with many symptoms, taste/smell, etc. Their 25ish YO daughter went to ER for O2, pneumonia diagnosis. So about as clear as you can get.

Now - probably a rapid positive, but they were in close contact with a known positive last week, so we'll see. Will update when I know more.


What does "probably" a rapid positive mean? Did they take rapid tests or not? Are they currently waiting on PCR results?
I asked what kind of test and she said "I don't know but it hurt like hell!"

I won't press her more on this, sorry.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.