UK Virus Mutation

3,783 Views | 23 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by BiochemAg97
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just when we thought 2020 couldn't get worse. Let's hope the vaccines have arrived in the nick of time to short-circuit this thing. Last couple of paragraphs perhaps the most important: CHANGING
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have not seen anything that has shown the new strains (UK or South African) where it has mutated to be more deadly like what happened with the Spanish flu. Several areas where it is being spread are under strict lockdowns, in the end they may not be helping as much as some would believe.
KlinkerAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

I have not seen anything that has shown the new strains (UK or South African) where it has mutated to be more deadly like what happened with the Spanish flu. Several areas where it is being spread are under strict lockdowns, in the end they may not be helping as much as some would believe.
The article says that, at present, it does not seem to be more deadly, just more transmittable.

The article also says the UK lockdown is in response to the mutation, not its causation. The timeline matters.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The biggest concern should be that it might be the spike protein that has changed. This new variant may or may not be able to be addressed by the current vaccine iteration if true. This may be nothing major in the grand scheme of things, but it could also mean that we are back to square one in terms of immunity globally if this virus spreads. Hopefully, the spike protien is close enough that the vaccine and/or immunity from previous infection are still relevant. It's much more likely that's the case - especially because there is no evolutionary pressure from the vaccine yet - so no need to panic, but it still could be very bad news. But this is part of the problem with allowing uncontrolled infection - you increase the odds of a bad mutation significantly.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14 said:

The biggest concern should be that it might be the spike protein that has changed. This new variant may or may not be able to be addressed by the current vaccine iteration if true. This may be nothing major in the grand scheme of things, but it could also mean that we are back to square one in terms of immunity globally if this virus spreads. Hopefully, the spike protien is close enough that the vaccine and/or immunity from previous infection are still relevant. It's much more likely that's the case - especially because there is no evolutionary pressure from the vaccine yet - so no need to panic, but it still could be very bad news. But this is part of the problem with allowing uncontrolled infection - you increase the odds of a bad mutation significantly.


Can you please explain the bolded part?
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

P.U.T.U said:

I have not seen anything that has shown the new strains (UK or South African) where it has mutated to be more deadly like what happened with the Spanish flu. Several areas where it is being spread are under strict lockdowns, in the end they may not be helping as much as some would believe.
The article says that, at present, it does not seem to be more deadly, just more transmittable.

The article also says the UK lockdown is in response to the mutation, not its causation. The timeline matters.
It mentions the other nations where it has spread and some of those have been under strict lockdown for a while and are still seeing a surge. We hope the death rate does not increase and time will tell.

London's tier 4 reaction will fine people that are doing non-essential travel. This just days before stating they were going to open up travel with other countries. I have read a few articles that have stated there has been no increase in death rate and jumping 2 safety "levels" to prohibit travel is a huge jump.
SBISA Victim
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sometimes virus mutations may increase transmissibility but reduce Virulence. They are doing research now to make sure it's not vaccine resistant although they don't believe it is.
Phat32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would assume he means that if a virus is allowed to run rampant, you have more available hosts and infections in which a virus has the opportunity to mutate.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gotcha, understood.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

74OA said:

P.U.T.U said:

I have not seen anything that has shown the new strains (UK or South African) where it has mutated to be more deadly like what happened with the Spanish flu. Several areas where it is being spread are under strict lockdowns, in the end they may not be helping as much as some would believe.
The article says that, at present, it does not seem to be more deadly, just more transmittable.

The article also says the UK lockdown is in response to the mutation, not its causation. The timeline matters.
It mentions the other nations where it has spread and some of those have been under strict lockdown for a while and are still seeing a surge. We hope the death rate does not increase and time will tell.

London's tier 4 reaction will fine people that are doing non-essential travel. This just days before stating they were going to open up travel with other countries. I have read a few articles that have stated there has been no increase in death rate and jumping 2 safety "levels" to prohibit travel is a huge jump.
They don't know what they don't know, so they're being particularly careful to suppress the spread of this new mutation until they do know more.

Seems prudent to me until they at least definitively understand if the mutation is more dangerous or not.

P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It has been around for 3 months, they should be able to know by now. Several articles have said it has not shown to be.

We can't shut down every time a new strain is discovered, we just need to do what we have always done and monitor it.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

It has been around for 3 months, they should be able to know by now. Several articles have said it has not shown to be.

We can't shut down every time a new strain is discovered, we just need to do what we have always done and monitor it.

Apparently Brit doctors, scientists and politicians disagree with you in this instance. I'll go with their perspective.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
it's likely that this vaccine being rolled out this year isn't a one and done

they'll have a tweaked formula probably next winter
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gordo14 said:

The biggest concern should be that it might be the spike protein that has changed. This new variant may or may not be able to be addressed by the current vaccine iteration if true. This may be nothing major in the grand scheme of things, but it could also mean that we are back to square one in terms of immunity globally if this virus spreads. Hopefully, the spike protien is close enough that the vaccine and/or immunity from previous infection are still relevant. It's much more likely that's the case - especially because there is no evolutionary pressure from the vaccine yet - so no need to panic, but it still could be very bad news. But this is part of the problem with allowing uncontrolled infection - you increase the odds of a bad mutation significantly.


Please ask the UK why they're "allowing" uncontrolled infection.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KlinkerAg11 said:

Could locking down and restricting things be causing the virus to mutate?

A mutation is the virus trying to get around things to live, could it be making itself more infectious because of lockdowns and sanitation standards?
No.
KlinkerAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

P.U.T.U said:

It has been around for 3 months, they should be able to know by now. Several articles have said it has not shown to be.

We can't shut down every time a new strain is discovered, we just need to do what we have always done and monitor it.

Apparently Brit doctors, scientists and politicians disagree with you in this instance. I'll go with their perspective.

They have been wrong at just about every turn, why would you go with them?
Fitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No real surprise here, but the UK variant appears to have reached community spread internationally.

Quote:

A case of the more contagious coronavirus variant first discovered in Britain was found in Colorado on Tuesday, Gov. Jared Polis said. It is the first confirmed case of the variant in the United States.

The variant was detected in a man in his 20s with no travel history, Mr. Polis said. The man was in isolation in Elbert County, southeast of Denver, he said.

...

Cases of the variant have been found in several countries, including Japan, Spain, France and Canada. Officials in India said on Tuesday that they had found six cases of the virus variant first detected in Britain.

Countries around the world have implemented stricter protocols for travelers entering from the United Kingdom. A new rule in the United States mandating that incoming travelers from the U.K. including American citizens show proof of a negative coronavirus test upon entry went into effect on Monday.


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/29/world/covid-variant-british-us.html
Phat32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wild that even with low international travel, it still made it around so quickly.

Fascinating.
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there any indication that this new UK strain effects children more than the original strain? Someone brought this up today so I figured I would come ask the experts.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/948152/Technical_Briefing_VOC202012-2_Briefing_2_FINAL.pdf

No significant difference in death. Seems to have a slightly higher attack success rate, which means it's more likely to cause infection post-exposure. There may be some other variables at play there though such as the weather which they've tried to correct for.

With contact tracing, they've been able to establish that only about 10% people who come in to close contact with an infected person will be infected. With this new strain, that number appears to be closer to 15%.
jpb1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So not much difference But I am not a research scientist. From the one graph showing g the age range it looks pretty similar to old stand. Am I looking at that right?
BiochemAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cone said:

it's likely that this vaccine being rolled out this year isn't a one and done

they'll have a tweaked formula probably next winter
And your conclusion is based on the complete lack of evidence of a mutation that reduces the effectiveness of the vaccine?

But hey, we will likely need to tweak a vaccine that is >90% effective and start all over again.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.