TX05CCHH said:
It does seem logical that if a second vaccine dose produces an extreme reaction that being introduced to the real virus would also have the same effect.
Not of this type. We have months of experience w/ mRNA vaccines. People need to be very deliberate in their risk/reward decisions on taking this unapproved injection. They need to educate themselves on the lowered bar this vaccine cleared versus what an FDA approved vaccine goes through2wealfth Man said:
We need to get the vaccine of we want to end this mess. We have decades of experience with vaccines. You have greater risks of death or injury in driving from your home to the grocery store in most cases.
Alb01 said:
Not this vaccine. Pharmaceutical companies have been trying to make a vaccine for regular coronavirus (common cold) for a very long time. The reason this hasn't worked is because in animal studies, when the animal was exposed to the live virus post vaccination they have experienced disease enhancement. We need to be very careful and not rush a vaccine through the stages to get it to market. Pathogenic priming is a real and valid concern that everyone should be aware of prior to vaccination.
The "common cold" is not the "regular coronavirus" at all. The common cold is known to be caused by a couple of hundred different viruses, with the majority being from the rhinovirus family. Some colds are caused by corona viruses, but certainly not most. Development of a successful cold vaccine would require a complex vaccine capable of recognizing many many different viruses. Because the common cold is not considered a serious illness, there has been little pressure or incentive to develop such a complex vaccine. Simply do a search for "why no cold vaccine" if you want to.Alb01 said:
Not this vaccine. Pharmaceutical companies have been trying to make a vaccine for regular coronavirus (common cold) for a very long time. The reason this hasn't worked is because in animal studies, when the animal was exposed to the live virus post vaccination they have experienced disease enhancement. We need to be very careful and not rush a vaccine through the stages to get it to market. Pathogenic priming is a real and valid concern that everyone should be aware of prior to vaccination.
2wealfth Man said:
We need to get the vaccine of we want to end this mess. We have decades of experience with vaccines. You have greater risks of death or injury in driving from your home to the grocery store in most cases.
..........and people just keep talking right past this.CDub06 said:
No. The organization that wrote that is anti-vax and pushes a lot of false narratives in that regard. This is from early December and some of their assumptions are contrary to the actual trial results.
And you have greater risk of death or injury driving from your home than you do from flying across the country on a jet. But, I'm still glad the airlines take safety precautions. :-)Wheatables02 said:
You have greater risks of death or injury in driving from your home than from Covid if you are under 70 with 1 or less comorbidities.
Supported by Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. Do not trust.TX05CCHH said:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.01.21250923v2