Shouldn't even reply, but I'm bored.

Silly article. Their source is infowars.

"Infested" is a silly word to use when talking about a virus where we already have an equivalent word, which is "infected."

This whole thing has been discussed already. Yes some of the ominous spike proteins get into other organs. That doesn't mean it's dangerous levels. Chicken you buy at the store has detectable levels of arsenic. But it's so low it isn't a real threat to a human. Similarly, yes the spike proteins can be toxic at high enough levels, but if you notice they don't even mention the levels because the level is incredibly low and not dangerousx

I hate this because we get so much fear porn on the "Covid is the plague" side that we just don't need any more from the "Covid isn't the plague side."

I've yet to see any indication that the vaccines are particularly harmful to humans.

That is one of the most anti-semitic, paranoid, crazy websites I have ever seen. How do people end up their to begin with much less willing to provide links?

Is this more paltable to your sensetivities?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/

That is a link from the article itself if you had bothered to even read it! But let me guess, the NIH is racist too!


I don't know how people go through life with blinders on, compartmentalizing the messenger and never looking at the message. Regardless of what you think of the site it is a significant scientific finding.

Am I missing something here? The paper you linked attributes the viral RNA to the fact that he was exposed and not yet fully vaccinated, not to the vaccine itself.

Well the initial link now goes to a defunct page but the paper itself is helpful.

In summary, 86 y/o with multiple high risk comorbidities receives shot 1 of mRNA vaccine, no major issues result for over 2 weeks. On day 18 he develops lower gastro issues and is admitted to hospital, where a week later he contracts COVID, most likely from his suite mate. Dies 2 days later resulting from kidney and lung failure.

Biopsy of 9 organs/tissues known to be severely impacted by COVID are sampled and found to have the virus in 7 of 9. Corresponding immune response (IgG serum) was high, while IgM was low, altogether implying early stage infection.

The authors conclude that the first of the two dose mRNA vaccines produce immunogenicity (activation of immune system) but not sterilizing immunity (neutralizing of virus).

One way to interpret is this is just more confirmation to get both rounds of the vaccines as just one shot doesn't get you all the way to sterilizing immunity. Another interpretation may be the gap in time between the first and second vaccine doses can be moderately more risky for some if Covid is contracted given the immune system has already been primed for a response, though I do feel obligated to say that's me editorializing and not stated in the paper. Probably worth reiterating the gentleman had myriad comorbidities and the collective strain plus fighting Covid ultimately was too much to handle.

Infowars - all intelligence ends when that's mentioned; like when I see cnn or nytimes or wapo

Quote:

---

I don't know how people go through life with blinders on, compartmentalizing the messenger and never looking at the message.

---

I agree to some extent but you have to have some standards. That website is insane. Here is how they describe themselves.

Quote:

---

Ideology

To make things clear, we DO endorse communism in its original Soviet Union form, we disavow Antifa as not real communists but as a bunch of Satanist schizophrenics who should all be sent to the Siberian gulags. We also support nationalism! We are both socialists and nationalists. Had the Axis and the USSR got along back in the 40s like they should have, the world would have been a totally different place now (for the good).

---

Windy City Ag said:

---

Quote:

---

I don't know how people go through life with blinders on, compartmentalizing the messenger and never looking at the message.

---

I agree to some extent but you have to have some standards. That website is insane. Here is how they describe themselves.

Quote:

---

Ideology

To make things clear, we DO endorse communism in its original Soviet Union form, we disavow Antifa as not real communists but as a bunch of Satanist schizophrenics who should all be sent to the Siberian gulags. We also support nationalism! We are both socialists and nationalists. Had the Axis and the USSR got along back in the 40s like they should have, the world would have been a totally different place now (for the good).

---

---

Windy City Ag said:

---

Quote:

---

I don't know how people go through life with blinders on, compartmentalizing the messenger and never looking at the message.

---

I agree to some extent but you have to have some standards. That website is insane. Here is how they describe themselves.

Quote:

---

Ideology

To make things clear, we DO endorse communism in its original Soviet Union form, we disavow Antifa as not real communists but as a bunch of Satanist schizophrenics who should all be sent to the Siberian gulags. We also support nationalism! We are both socialists and nationalists. Had the Axis and the USSR got along back in the 40s like they should have, the world would have been a totally different place now (for the good).

---

---

Sooooo.... National Socialism?

Let's go ahead and give that a quick Google....

Quote:

---

National Socialism most often refers to Nazism, the ideology of the Nazi Party, which ruled Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. The term "national socialism" was used by a number of unrelated groups before the Nazis, but since their rise to prominence it has become associated almost exclusively with their ideas.

---

Yeah..... I know calling people "Nazis" has gotten way too commonplace recently, but this site appears to be advocating real-deal literal Nazism. Not gonna put a whole lot of stock in anything they have to say.

I've noticed that every few days, someone not heard of here often before posts a scare story. I'm wondering what their end goal is.

Another dose of "Public Service" from Texags

It's fun to watch people try to interpret what they believe is science, when in reality they are reading about someone's unfounded opinion.

In4TheHuddle said:

---

Is this more paltable to your sensetivities?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/

That is a link from the article itself if you had bothered to even read it! But let me guess, the NIH is racist too!


I don't know how people go through life with blinders on, compartmentalizing the messenger and never looking at the message. Regardless of what you think of the site it is a significant scientific finding.

---

That article does not support the point you are trying to make.

This patient died from sepsis due to bacterial pneumonia complicated by ischemic colitis and renal failure. The point of publishing this paper was to be the first to characterize autopsy findings after COVID vaccination, not to imply that the vaccine was the cause of death.