Status:
Signed
HIGH SCHOOL
Tory Blaylock
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Oklahoma
Signed
Texas A&M
None
Alabama
None
Arizona
None
Arizona State
None
Arkansas
None
Auburn
None
Baylor
None
Colorado
None
Colorado State
None
Connecticut
None
Duke
None
Florida State
None
Georgia
None
Houston
None
Incarnate Word
None
Kentucky
None
Louisiana Tech
None
Miami
None
Michigan State
None
Missouri
None
Nebraska
None
Notre Dame
None
Ohio State
None
Oklahoma State
None
Ole Miss
None
Oregon
None
Penn State
None
Sam Houston
None
SMU
None
South Carolina
None
Southern
None
Stephen F Austin
None
TCU
None
Tennessee
None
Texas
None
Texas State
None
Texas Tech
None
UCF
None
UNLV
None
USC
None
UTSA
None
Vanderbilt
None
Wisconsin
None
+ 39 More
Videos
(14 Total)
12/8/2024
Highlights: North Shore defeats Atascocita in dominant fashion, 49-21
11/30/2024
Highlights: Atascocita outlasts Fulshear in high-scoring battle, 47-42
11/16/2024
Highlights: Atascocita beats Dickinson in high-scoring affair, 50-45
10/27/2024
Highlights: North Shore beats Atascocita in Friday night thriller
10/6/2024
Highlights: Atascocita beats Summer Creek in battle of Houston powers
9/7/2024
Highlights: Atascocita uses big second half to pull away from Katy
12/3/2023
Highlights: North Shore moves on to semifinals with huge win over Atascocita
10/28/2023
Highlights: North Shore runs past Atascocita in a huge 6A showdown
10/22/2023
Highlights: Atascocita outlasts C.E. King in overtime thriller, 28-21
9/29/2023
Highlights: Atascocita blanks West Brook in district matchup, 71-0
9/13/2023
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
10/28/2022
Highlights: North Shore uses late rally to get by Atascocita, 16-13
12/30/1969
Sophomore Season
12/30/1969
Jr. Year
Updates
14 days ago by
TexAgs Recruiting
TexAgs' TXHSFB Recap: Reviewing our coverage from the quarterfinal round
3:21
16 days ago by
Cade Draughon
Highlights: North Shore defeats Atascocita in dominant fashion, 49-21
23 days ago by
TexAgs Recruiting
TexAgs' TXHSFB Recap: Reviewing our coverage from the regional round
Photos
(34 Total)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×