default image
Status:
Committed
HIGH SCHOOL

Waden Charles

Athlete
6′3″ / 185 lbs
Boynton Beach, FL
Somerset Academy Canyons
Class of 2025
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 89.7
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
UCF
Committed
7/3/2024
Texas A&M
None
Akron
None
Arkansas State
None
Florida
None
Florida A&M
None
Florida Atlantic
None
Florida State
None
Illinois
None
Indiana
None
Louisville
None
LSU
None
Miami
None
South Florida
None
Toledo
None
+ 10 More

Videos

(1 Total)
Chosen One

Updates

Jason Howell
1 yr ago by Jason Howell
March 31-April 1 Weekend Visitor List
There are quite a few top talents planning to visit this weekend and here is what we have so far. As always expect some names to be added and some to be taken away as we continue to gather information.March 31Official visitRB David Bailey, Boston College/Colorado State grad transfer2024WR Zy'Marion Lang, Palmetto (FL)DL TJ Lindsey, Bryant (AR)LB Jordan Lockhart, Bellflower (CA) St. John BoscoS Zaquan Patterson, Hollywood (FL) Chaminade-Madonna2025WR Kamare Williams, Hollywood (FL) Chaminade-MadonnaATH Waden Charles, Boynton Beach (FL) Somerset Academy Canyons2026WR Denairius Gray, Boynton Beach (FL) Somerset Academy CanyonsApril 1CommitsOL Ashton Funk, Katy (TX) TompkinsTransferOL Derek Farraro, Rice/Richmond grad transfer2024WR Karson Maynard, Melissa (TX)OL Ory Williams, San Marcos (TX)DL Colin Simmons, Duncanville (TX)DL Nigel Smith II, Melissa (TX)LB Xavier Atkins, Humble (TX) Summer Creek - LSULB Dylan Williams, Long Beach (CA) PolyS Myles Davis, Converse (TX) JudsonS Brandon Jacob, Orlando (FL) EvansS Josh Lair, Missouri City (TX) Fort Bend MarshallLS Trent Baker, Friendswood (TX)K Clayton Amaya, Spring Branch (TX) Smithson Valley2025DL Dilan Battle, Mansfield (TX) TimberviewDL Xavier Ukponu, Denton (TX) GuyerATH Jonah Williams, Galveston (TX) Ball2026LB Tank King, Port Arthur Memorial
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.